home / skills / sickn33 / antigravity-awesome-skills / writing-plans

writing-plans skill

/skills/writing-plans

This skill generates comprehensive implementation plans for complex tasks, detailing files, tests, steps, and commits to guide engineers from zero context.

This is most likely a fork of the writing-plans skill from obra
npx playbooks add skill sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill writing-plans

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (1)
SKILL.md
3.2 KB
---
name: writing-plans
description: Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
---

# Writing Plans

## Overview

Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.

Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.

**Announce at start:** "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."

**Context:** This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).

**Save plans to:** `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md`

## Bite-Sized Task Granularity

**Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):**
- "Write the failing test" - step
- "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
- "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
- "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
- "Commit" - step

## Plan Document Header

**Every plan MUST start with this header:**

```markdown
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan

> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.

**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]

**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]

**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]

---
```

## Task Structure

```markdown
### Task N: [Component Name]

**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`

**Step 1: Write the failing test**

```python
def test_specific_behavior():
    result = function(input)
    assert result == expected
```

**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"

**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**

```python
def function(input):
    return expected
```

**Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: PASS

**Step 5: Commit**

```bash
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
```
```

## Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
- Exact commands with expected output
- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits

## Execution Handoff

After saving the plan, offer execution choice:

**"Plan complete and saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:**

**1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration

**2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints

**Which approach?"**

**If Subagent-Driven chosen:**
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
- Stay in this session
- Fresh subagent per task + code review

**If Parallel Session chosen:**
- Guide them to open new session in worktree
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans

Overview

This skill produces detailed, test-first implementation plans for multi-step engineering tasks before any code is written. It assumes the executor is a competent developer with no prior knowledge of the codebase or good test design. Plans are saved as dated markdown files with clear headers, exact file paths, full code snippets, and atomic 2–5 minute steps to follow.

How this skill works

The skill inspects a specification or requirements and breaks the work into bite-sized TDD tasks. Each task lists exact files to create or modify, the failing test to write, the minimal implementation required, commands to run with expected output, and commit instructions. It enforces YAGNI, DRY, frequent commits, and places the plan in docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md.

When to use it

  • Before touching code for a new feature or refactor that involves multiple coordinated changes
  • When you need a hand-off-ready plan for distributed execution or subagent workflows
  • To ensure TDD-first development and unambiguous test cases
  • When contributors have zero context about the codebase or the toolchain

Best practices

  • Start the plan with the required announcement: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
  • Use a dedicated worktree for execution and save the plan under docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
  • Keep each step 2–5 minutes long: failing test, run, minimal code, run, commit
  • Always include exact file paths, full code snippets, exact commands, and expected outputs
  • Prefer DRY and YAGNI: implement only what tests require, no speculative features

Example use cases

  • Add a new API endpoint that touches backend, database migration, and frontend UI with coordinated tests
  • Refactor a module into smaller pieces while preserving behavior through explicit tests
  • Implement feature flags with tests proving both on/off behavior and rollout steps
  • Create a new plugin integration where reviewers need step-by-step reproducible changes

FAQ

Where is the plan saved?

Save plans to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md using the documented header and structure.

How granular should steps be?

Each step should be a single action that takes about 2–5 minutes: write a test, run it, implement the minimum, run tests, commit.

What execution options do I offer after saving?

Offer a subagent-driven option that runs tasks in-session with per-task reviews, or a parallel session option that executes the plan in a new session/worktree.