home / skills / zeeshan080 / ai-native-robotics / student-language-guide
This skill helps you tailor student-facing language by simplifying terms, adding analogies, and avoiding internal labels in educational content.
npx playbooks add skill zeeshan080/ai-native-robotics --skill student-language-guideReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: student-language-guide
description: Provide student-facing language rules for educational content. Use when writing lessons, checking language appropriateness, or validating content for students.
allowed-tools: Read
---
# Student Language Guide
## Instructions
When writing student-facing content:
1. Use clear, accessible language
2. Avoid internal jargon and labels
3. Include analogies for complex concepts
4. Match language complexity to layer
## Golden Rules
1. **Never expose internal labels** (L1, L2, etc. to students)
2. **Avoid jargon** without explanation
3. **Use active voice** for instructions
4. **Include analogies** for abstract concepts
5. **Be encouraging** but not condescending
## Language Dos and Don'ts
| DO | DON'T |
|----|-------|
| "In this lesson, you'll learn..." | "This L2 content covers..." |
| "Think of a robot like a..." | "The robot abstraction..." |
| "Try this exercise" | "Execute the following procedure" |
| "You've learned a lot!" | "Basic concepts completed" |
## Reference
See [examples.md](examples.md) for good/bad examples.
This skill provides student-facing language rules and concrete phrasing guidance for educational content. It helps writers convert technical curriculum and developer-facing notes into clear, age-appropriate lessons that respect learners and avoid internal jargon. Use it to shape tone, phrasing, and examples so materials are accessible and encouraging.
The skill inspects lesson text and flags internal labels, jargon, passive constructions, and phrasing that may sound condescending or too technical. It suggests alternatives, offers analogy prompts for abstract concepts, and recommends complexity adjustments to match the learner layer. Outputs are short, actionable rewrites and rule-based checks.
Can this skill rewrite entire lessons automatically?
It provides suggested rewrites and specific phrasing alternatives; authors should review and adapt them to preserve pedagogy and technical accuracy.
How does it decide the appropriate complexity level?
You specify the learner layer or target audience; the skill uses that input to simplify vocabulary, shorten sentences, and suggest analogies suited to that level.