issue-progress-tracking skill

---
name: issue-progress-tracking
license: MIT
compatibility: "Claude Code 2.1.34+."
description: "Auto-updates GitHub issues with commit progress. Use when starting work on an issue, tracking progress during implementation, or completing work with a PR."
context: inherit
version: 1.0.0
author: OrchestKit
tags: [git, github, issues, tracking, workflow]
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: [Bash]
complexity: low
metadata:
  category: workflow-automation
---

# Issue Progress Tracking

Ceremony guide for tracking GitHub issue progress via `gh` CLI. Ensures issues stay updated as work progresses from start to PR.

## Quick Start

```bash
/issue-progress-tracking 123
```

---

## Phase 1: Start Work

Label the issue and create a feature branch:

```bash
# Move issue to in-progress
gh issue edit $ARGUMENTS --add-label "status:in-progress" --remove-label "status:todo"
gh issue comment $ARGUMENTS --body "Starting work on this issue."

# Create feature branch
git checkout -b issue/$ARGUMENTS-brief-description
```

**Rules:**
- Always branch from the default branch (main/dev)
- Branch name format: `issue/<number>-<brief-description>`
- Never work directly on main/dev

---

## Phase 2: During Work — Small Commits

Commit after each logical step, not at the end. Every commit references the issue:

```bash
# Each commit references the issue number
git commit -m "feat(#$ARGUMENTS): add user model

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>"
```

**Rules:**
- One logical change per commit (atomic)
- Reference issue in every commit: `type(#N): description`
- Commit early and often — don't accumulate a massive diff

---

## Phase 3: Report Progress (Long Implementations)

For multi-step work, post progress updates:

```bash
gh issue comment $ARGUMENTS --body "Progress update:
- Completed: database schema, API endpoints
- In progress: frontend components
- Remaining: tests, documentation"
```

**When to post updates:**
- After completing a major milestone
- When blocked or changing approach
- Before stepping away from a long task

---

## Phase 4: Complete Work

Create the PR and update labels:

```bash
# Create PR that closes the issue
gh pr create \
  --title "feat(#$ARGUMENTS): brief description" \
  --body "Closes #$ARGUMENTS

## Changes
- Change 1
- Change 2

## Test Plan
- [ ] Unit tests pass
- [ ] Manual verification"

# Update issue status
gh issue edit $ARGUMENTS --add-label "status:in-review" --remove-label "status:in-progress"
```

---

## Rules Quick Reference

| Rule | Impact | What It Covers |
|------|--------|----------------|
| [Start Work Ceremony](rules/start-work-ceremony.md) | HIGH | Branch creation, label updates, initial comment |
| [Small Commits](rules/small-commits.md) | HIGH | Atomic commits referencing issues |

**Total: 2 rules across 2 categories**

---

## Key Decisions

| Decision | Choice | Rationale |
|----------|--------|-----------|
| Label prefix | `status:` | Consistent with GitHub conventions |
| Branch format | `issue/<N>-desc` | Links branch to issue automatically |
| Commit reference | `type(#N):` | Conventional commits + issue linking |
| Progress comments | Manual | Keeps humans in the loop |

---

## Common Mistakes

1. **Starting work without labeling** — team loses visibility into who is working on what
2. **Giant commits at the end** — makes review harder and history useless for bisect
3. **Forgetting to link PR to issue** — issue stays open after merge
4. **Not updating labels on PR creation** — issue shows "in-progress" during review

---

## Related Skills

- `commit` — Commit with conventional format
- `fix-issue` — Full issue resolution workflow
- `implement` — Feature implementation with parallel agents
- `create-pr` — Create pull requests