home / skills / yanko-belov / code-craft / api-versioning
This skill helps you design and evolve APIs safely by enforcing versioning, deprecation, and non-breaking changes across clients.
npx playbooks add skill yanko-belov/code-craft --skill api-versioningReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: api-versioning
description: Use when designing or modifying APIs. Use when adding breaking changes. Use when clients depend on API stability.
---
# API Versioning
## Overview
**Version your APIs from day one. Never break existing clients.**
Breaking changes without versioning destroy client trust. Version APIs explicitly, support multiple versions gracefully, and deprecate with ample warning.
## When to Use
- Designing new API endpoints
- Adding or modifying existing endpoints
- Making changes that could break clients
- Planning API evolution strategy
- Reviewing API design decisions
## The Iron Rule
```
NEVER make breaking changes to a released API version.
```
**No exceptions:**
- Not for "it's a bug fix"
- Not for "nobody uses that field"
- Not for "we'll notify clients"
- Not for "it's just internal"
- Not for "the old way was wrong"
**Breaking changes require a new version. Always.**
## Detection: What's a Breaking Change?
| Change | Breaking? | Safe Alternative |
|--------|-----------|------------------|
| Removing a field | YES | Deprecate, keep returning |
| Renaming a field | YES | Add new, keep old |
| Changing field type | YES | Add new field |
| Changing response structure | YES | New version |
| Adding required parameter | YES | Make optional with default |
| Removing endpoint | YES | Deprecate, maintain |
| Changing error codes | YES | Add new codes, keep old |
| Adding optional field | NO | Safe to add |
| Adding new endpoint | NO | Safe to add |
| Adding optional parameter | NO | Safe to add |
## Versioning Strategies
### 1. URL Path Versioning (Recommended)
```typescript
// ✅ CORRECT: Version in URL path
// /api/v1/users
// /api/v2/users
app.get('/api/v1/users', handleUsersV1);
app.get('/api/v2/users', handleUsersV2);
```
**Pros:** Explicit, cacheable, easy to route
**Cons:** URL proliferation
### 2. Header Versioning
```typescript
// ✅ CORRECT: Version in Accept header
// Accept: application/vnd.api+json; version=1
app.get('/api/users', (req, res) => {
const version = parseVersion(req.headers.accept);
if (version === 1) return handleUsersV1(req, res);
if (version === 2) return handleUsersV2(req, res);
return res.status(406).json({ error: 'Unsupported version' });
});
```
**Pros:** Clean URLs
**Cons:** Hidden, harder to test, caching complexity
### 3. Query Parameter Versioning
```typescript
// ✅ ACCEPTABLE: Version as query param
// /api/users?version=1
app.get('/api/users', (req, res) => {
const version = parseInt(req.query.version) || LATEST_VERSION;
// ...
});
```
**Pros:** Simple
**Cons:** Optional parameter often forgotten
## Correct Version Evolution Pattern
```typescript
// Version 1: Original API
interface UserV1 {
id: string;
name: string; // Full name
email: string;
}
// Version 2: Split name into parts (BREAKING!)
interface UserV2 {
id: string;
firstName: string; // New field
lastName: string; // New field
email: string;
}
// ✅ CORRECT: Support both versions
class UserController {
async getUserV1(id: string): Promise<UserV1> {
const user = await this.userService.getUser(id);
return {
id: user.id,
name: `${user.firstName} ${user.lastName}`, // Compute for v1 clients
email: user.email,
};
}
async getUserV2(id: string): Promise<UserV2> {
const user = await this.userService.getUser(id);
return {
id: user.id,
firstName: user.firstName,
lastName: user.lastName,
email: user.email,
};
}
}
// ❌ WRONG: Silently change v1 response
// ❌ WRONG: Force all clients to update simultaneously
// ❌ WRONG: Remove v1 without deprecation period
```
## Deprecation Protocol
Never surprise clients. Follow this:
```typescript
// 1. Announce deprecation (headers + docs)
res.setHeader('Deprecation', 'true');
res.setHeader('Sunset', 'Sat, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT');
res.setHeader('Link', '</api/v2/users>; rel="successor-version"');
// 2. Log usage to track migration
logger.info('Deprecated v1 endpoint called', {
endpoint: '/api/v1/users',
clientId: req.clientId,
});
// 3. Maintain for deprecation period (minimum 6 months for external APIs)
// 4. Return 410 Gone after sunset date
if (isPastSunset('/api/v1/users')) {
return res.status(410).json({
error: 'This API version has been retired',
migration: 'https://docs.api.com/migration-v1-to-v2',
successor: '/api/v2/users',
});
}
```
## Pressure Resistance Protocol
### 1. "Just Ship It, We'll Version Later"
**Pressure:** "We need to launch, versioning can wait"
**Response:** Adding versioning to an existing API is 10x harder than starting with it. Clients already depend on the unversioned endpoints.
**Action:** Add `/v1/` prefix now. Takes 5 minutes.
### 2. "It's Internal, We Control All Clients"
**Pressure:** "We can just update all our services"
**Response:** Internal APIs become external. Services can't update simultaneously. Deployments fail mid-rollout.
**Action:** Version internal APIs too. Your future self will thank you.
### 3. "It's a Bug Fix, Not a Breaking Change"
**Pressure:** "The old behavior was wrong"
**Response:** Clients may depend on the "wrong" behavior. A fix can break them.
**Action:** Fix in new version. Document the fix. Let clients opt-in.
### 4. "Nobody Uses That Field"
**Pressure:** "Analytics show it's unused"
**Response:** Analytics might be wrong. One client relying on it = breaking change.
**Action:** Deprecate with warning, keep returning the field, sunset after migration period.
### 5. "We'll Just Notify Clients"
**Pressure:** "We'll email everyone before the change"
**Response:** Emails get missed. Clients need deploy time. Surprise breaks cause outages.
**Action:** Deprecation headers + sunset period + new version.
## Red Flags - STOP and Reconsider
If you notice ANY of these, you're about to break clients:
- Removing or renaming fields without new version
- Changing response structure "to improve it"
- "Nobody will notice this change"
- No version in API path or headers
- Only one version supported
- Deprecating without sunset date
- Changing semantics (same field, different meaning)
**All of these mean: Create a new API version.**
## Version Lifecycle Management
```
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ ┌───────┐
│ Alpha │ ──► │ Released │ ──► │ Deprecated │ ──► │ Sunset│
└─────────┘ └─────────────┘ └────────────┘ └───────┘
Breaking OK No breaking Warn clients 410 Gone
Support 2-3 ver 6+ months Remove code
```
| Phase | Breaking Changes | Client Action |
|-------|------------------|---------------|
| Alpha (v0.x) | Allowed with notice | Expect instability |
| Released (v1+) | Never | Rely on stability |
| Deprecated | None | Migrate to successor |
| Sunset | N/A | Endpoint returns 410 |
## Common Rationalizations (All Invalid)
| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "We'll add versioning later" | Later = breaking existing clients. |
| "It's internal only" | Internal becomes external. Version anyway. |
| "Small change, won't break anything" | Small changes break clients constantly. |
| "We'll coordinate the update" | Coordination fails. Services deploy independently. |
| "It's just a rename" | Renames break clients that parse responses. |
| "The docs explain the change" | Clients don't re-read docs. Code breaks. |
| "Analytics show no usage" | One client matters. Analytics miss things. |
## Quick Reference
| Scenario | Action |
|----------|--------|
| New API | Start with `/v1/` immediately |
| Adding field | Add to current version (non-breaking) |
| Removing field | New version + deprecate old |
| Renaming field | Add new name, keep old, deprecate old |
| Changing structure | New version |
| Bug that changes behavior | Fix in new version |
| Deprecating version | Announce + 6mo minimum + sunset date |
## The Bottom Line
**Version from day one. Never break released versions. Deprecate gracefully.**
When pressured to "just change it" or "version later": add versioning now, create new version for breaking changes, give clients time to migrate. API stability is a contract—don't break it.
This skill guides designing and evolving APIs with explicit versioning and strict rules to avoid breaking clients. It emphasizes starting with versioning from day one, supporting multiple versions concurrently, and using clear deprecation and sunset procedures. Followable patterns and protocols reduce risk and preserve client trust.
The skill inspects API change plans and flags any breaking changes that require a new version. It recommends concrete versioning strategies (URL path, header, query param), outlines migration patterns for evolving data shapes, and prescribes a deprecation protocol including headers, logging, and sunset behavior. It also provides pressure-resistance responses for common stakeholder objections.
When is a change considered breaking?
Any change that removes/renames fields, changes types or response structure, removes endpoints, or adds a required parameter is breaking and needs a new version.
Which versioning strategy is best?
URL path versioning is recommended for clarity and cacheability; header or query versioning are acceptable depending on preferences and tooling.
How long should I keep deprecated versions?
Provide a clear deprecation period—minimum six months for public APIs—announce with Deprecation and Sunset headers, and log usage for migration tracking.