playbooks

home / skills / softaworks / agent-toolkit / c4-architecture

c4-architecture skill

/skills/c4-architecture

This skill generates C4 architecture diagrams and documentation in Mermaid syntax to visualize software structure and communication.

npx playbooks add skill softaworks/agent-toolkit --skill c4-architecture

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (5)
SKILL.md
10.3 KB
---
name: c4-architecture
description: Generate architecture documentation using C4 model Mermaid diagrams. Use when asked to create architecture diagrams, document system architecture, visualize software structure, create C4 diagrams, or generate context/container/component/deployment diagrams. Triggers include "architecture diagram", "C4 diagram", "system context", "container diagram", "component diagram", "deployment diagram", "document architecture", "visualize architecture".
---

# C4 Architecture Documentation

Generate software architecture documentation using C4 model diagrams in Mermaid syntax.

## Workflow

1. **Understand scope** - Determine which C4 level(s) are needed based on audience
2. **Analyze codebase** - Explore the system to identify components, containers, and relationships
3. **Generate diagrams** - Create Mermaid C4 diagrams at appropriate abstraction levels
4. **Document** - Write diagrams to markdown files with explanatory context

## C4 Diagram Levels

Select the appropriate level based on the documentation need:

| Level | Diagram Type | Audience | Shows | When to Create |
|-------|-------------|----------|-------|----------------|
| 1 | **C4Context** | Everyone | System + external actors | Always (required) |
| 2 | **C4Container** | Technical | Apps, databases, services | Always (required) |
| 3 | **C4Component** | Developers | Internal components | Only if adds value |
| 4 | **C4Deployment** | DevOps | Infrastructure nodes | For production systems |
| - | **C4Dynamic** | Technical | Request flows (numbered) | For complex workflows |

**Key Insight:** "Context + Container diagrams are sufficient for most software development teams." Only create Component/Code diagrams when they genuinely add value.

## Quick Start Examples

### System Context (Level 1)
```mermaid
C4Context
  title System Context - Workout Tracker

  Person(user, "User", "Tracks workouts and exercises")
  System(app, "Workout Tracker", "Vue PWA for tracking strength and CrossFit workouts")
  System_Ext(browser, "Web Browser", "Stores data in IndexedDB")

  Rel(user, app, "Uses")
  Rel(app, browser, "Persists data to", "IndexedDB")
```

### Container Diagram (Level 2)
```mermaid
C4Container
  title Container Diagram - Workout Tracker

  Person(user, "User", "Tracks workouts")

  Container_Boundary(app, "Workout Tracker PWA") {
    Container(spa, "SPA", "Vue 3, TypeScript", "Single-page application")
    Container(pinia, "State Management", "Pinia", "Manages application state")
    ContainerDb(indexeddb, "IndexedDB", "Dexie", "Local workout storage")
  }

  Rel(user, spa, "Uses")
  Rel(spa, pinia, "Reads/writes state")
  Rel(pinia, indexeddb, "Persists", "Dexie ORM")
```

### Component Diagram (Level 3)
```mermaid
C4Component
  title Component Diagram - Workout Feature

  Container(views, "Views", "Vue Router pages")

  Container_Boundary(workout, "Workout Feature") {
    Component(useWorkout, "useWorkout", "Composable", "Workout execution state")
    Component(useTimer, "useTimer", "Composable", "Timer state machine")
    Component(workoutRepo, "WorkoutRepository", "Dexie", "Workout persistence")
  }

  Rel(views, useWorkout, "Uses")
  Rel(useWorkout, useTimer, "Controls")
  Rel(useWorkout, workoutRepo, "Saves to")
```

### Dynamic Diagram (Request Flow)
```mermaid
C4Dynamic
  title Dynamic Diagram - User Sign In Flow

  ContainerDb(db, "Database", "PostgreSQL", "User credentials")
  Container(spa, "Single-Page App", "React", "Banking UI")

  Container_Boundary(api, "API Application") {
    Component(signIn, "Sign In Controller", "Express", "Auth endpoint")
    Component(security, "Security Service", "JWT", "Validates credentials")
  }

  Rel(spa, signIn, "1. Submit credentials", "JSON/HTTPS")
  Rel(signIn, security, "2. Validate")
  Rel(security, db, "3. Query user", "SQL")

  UpdateRelStyle(spa, signIn, $textColor="blue", $offsetY="-30")
```

### Deployment Diagram
```mermaid
C4Deployment
  title Deployment Diagram - Production

  Deployment_Node(browser, "Customer Browser", "Chrome/Firefox") {
    Container(spa, "SPA", "React", "Web application")
  }

  Deployment_Node(aws, "AWS Cloud", "us-east-1") {
    Deployment_Node(ecs, "ECS Cluster", "Fargate") {
      Container(api, "API Service", "Node.js", "REST API")
    }
    Deployment_Node(rds, "RDS", "db.r5.large") {
      ContainerDb(db, "Database", "PostgreSQL", "Application data")
    }
  }

  Rel(spa, api, "API calls", "HTTPS")
  Rel(api, db, "Reads/writes", "JDBC")
```

## Element Syntax

### People and Systems
```
Person(alias, "Label", "Description")
Person_Ext(alias, "Label", "Description")       # External person
System(alias, "Label", "Description")
System_Ext(alias, "Label", "Description")       # External system
SystemDb(alias, "Label", "Description")         # Database system
SystemQueue(alias, "Label", "Description")      # Queue system
```

### Containers
```
Container(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Container_Ext(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ContainerDb(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ContainerQueue(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
```

### Components
```
Component(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Component_Ext(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ComponentDb(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
```

### Boundaries
```
Enterprise_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
System_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
Container_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
Boundary(alias, "Label", "type") { ... }
```

### Relationships
```
Rel(from, to, "Label")
Rel(from, to, "Label", "Technology")
BiRel(from, to, "Label")                        # Bidirectional
Rel_U(from, to, "Label")                        # Upward
Rel_D(from, to, "Label")                        # Downward
Rel_L(from, to, "Label")                        # Leftward
Rel_R(from, to, "Label")                        # Rightward
```

### Deployment Nodes
```
Deployment_Node(alias, "Label", "Type", "Description") { ... }
Node(alias, "Label", "Type", "Description") { ... }  # Shorthand
```

## Styling and Layout

### Layout Configuration
```
UpdateLayoutConfig($c4ShapeInRow="3", $c4BoundaryInRow="1")
```
- `$c4ShapeInRow` - Number of shapes per row (default: 4)
- `$c4BoundaryInRow` - Number of boundaries per row (default: 2)

### Element Styling
```
UpdateElementStyle(alias, $fontColor="red", $bgColor="grey", $borderColor="red")
```

### Relationship Styling
```
UpdateRelStyle(from, to, $textColor="blue", $lineColor="blue", $offsetX="5", $offsetY="-10")
```
Use `$offsetX` and `$offsetY` to fix overlapping relationship labels.

## Best Practices

### Essential Rules

1. **Every element must have**: Name, Type, Technology (where applicable), and Description
2. **Use unidirectional arrows only** - Bidirectional arrows create ambiguity
3. **Label arrows with action verbs** - "Sends email using", "Reads from", not just "uses"
4. **Include technology labels** - "JSON/HTTPS", "JDBC", "gRPC"
5. **Stay under 20 elements per diagram** - Split complex systems into multiple diagrams

### Clarity Guidelines

1. **Start at Level 1** - Context diagrams help frame the system scope
2. **One diagram per file** - Keep diagrams focused on a single abstraction level
3. **Meaningful aliases** - Use descriptive aliases (e.g., `orderService` not `s1`)
4. **Concise descriptions** - Keep descriptions under 50 characters when possible
5. **Always include a title** - "System Context diagram for [System Name]"

### What to Avoid

See [references/common-mistakes.md](references/common-mistakes.md) for detailed anti-patterns:
- Confusing containers (deployable) vs components (non-deployable)
- Modeling shared libraries as containers
- Showing message brokers as single containers instead of individual topics
- Adding undefined abstraction levels like "subcomponents"
- Removing type labels to "simplify" diagrams

## Microservices Guidelines

### Single Team Ownership
Model each microservice as a **container** (or container group):
```mermaid
C4Container
  title Microservices - Single Team

  System_Boundary(platform, "E-commerce Platform") {
    Container(orderApi, "Order Service", "Spring Boot", "Order processing")
    ContainerDb(orderDb, "Order DB", "PostgreSQL", "Order data")
    Container(inventoryApi, "Inventory Service", "Node.js", "Stock management")
    ContainerDb(inventoryDb, "Inventory DB", "MongoDB", "Stock data")
  }
```

### Multi-Team Ownership
Promote microservices to **software systems** when owned by separate teams:
```mermaid
C4Context
  title Microservices - Multi-Team

  Person(customer, "Customer", "Places orders")
  System(orderSystem, "Order System", "Team Alpha")
  System(inventorySystem, "Inventory System", "Team Beta")
  System(paymentSystem, "Payment System", "Team Gamma")

  Rel(customer, orderSystem, "Places orders")
  Rel(orderSystem, inventorySystem, "Checks stock")
  Rel(orderSystem, paymentSystem, "Processes payment")
```

### Event-Driven Architecture
Show individual topics/queues as containers, NOT a single "Kafka" box:
```mermaid
C4Container
  title Event-Driven Architecture

  Container(orderService, "Order Service", "Java", "Creates orders")
  Container(stockService, "Stock Service", "Java", "Manages inventory")
  ContainerQueue(orderTopic, "order.created", "Kafka", "Order events")
  ContainerQueue(stockTopic, "stock.reserved", "Kafka", "Stock events")

  Rel(orderService, orderTopic, "Publishes to")
  Rel(stockService, orderTopic, "Subscribes to")
  Rel(stockService, stockTopic, "Publishes to")
  Rel(orderService, stockTopic, "Subscribes to")
```

## Output Location

Write architecture documentation to `docs/architecture/` with naming convention:
- `c4-context.md` - System context diagram
- `c4-containers.md` - Container diagram
- `c4-components-{feature}.md` - Component diagrams per feature
- `c4-deployment.md` - Deployment diagram
- `c4-dynamic-{flow}.md` - Dynamic diagrams for specific flows

## Audience-Appropriate Detail

| Audience | Recommended Diagrams |
|----------|---------------------|
| Executives | System Context only |
| Product Managers | Context + Container |
| Architects | Context + Container + key Components |
| Developers | All levels as needed |
| DevOps | Container + Deployment |

## References

- [references/c4-syntax.md](references/c4-syntax.md) - Complete Mermaid C4 syntax
- [references/common-mistakes.md](references/common-mistakes.md) - Anti-patterns to avoid
- [references/advanced-patterns.md](references/advanced-patterns.md) - Microservices, event-driven, deployment

Overview

This skill generates C4-model architecture documentation and Mermaid diagrams for software systems. It produces context, container, component, dynamic, and deployment diagrams plus Markdown files with explanatory text. Use it to standardize architecture docs and produce audience-appropriate visualizations quickly.

How this skill works

The skill inspects the requested scope and selects C4 levels appropriate for the audience (context, container, component, deployment, or dynamic). It analyzes provided system descriptions or codebase metadata to identify people, systems, containers, components, relationships, and deployment nodes. It then emits Mermaid C4 syntax and writes focused Markdown files to a docs/architecture/ layout with titles and short explanations.

When to use it

  • You need an architecture diagram for planning or reviews
  • Document system scope for stakeholders (System Context)
  • Show application boundaries and runtime pieces (Container Diagram)
  • Explain internal design to developers (Component Diagram)
  • Describe infrastructure and runtime topology (Deployment Diagram)

Best practices

  • Always start with a System Context diagram to frame scope
  • Include name, type, technology and a concise description for every element
  • Prefer unidirectional relationships labeled with action verbs
  • Keep diagrams under ~20 elements; split into multiple diagrams when complex
  • One diagram per file and include a clear title and audience note

Example use cases

  • Create a System Context diagram for product kickoff slides
  • Generate Container diagrams to hand to engineering for implementation
  • Produce Component diagrams for new feature onboarding
  • Author Deployment diagrams for production runbooks and runbook reviews
  • Model event-driven microservices with topics as containers

FAQ

Which C4 levels are mandatory?

Context and Container diagrams are recommended for most teams; Component and Deployment are created only when they add value.

How are Mermaid diagrams organized on disk?

Diagrams and explanations are written to docs/architecture/ with conventional filenames like c4-context.md, c4-containers.md, c4-components-{feature}.md, and c4-deployment.md.