home / skills / snarktank / amp-skills / ralph
/ralph
This skill orchestrates Ralph feature planning and task execution by guiding mode selection, breaking work into tasks, and tracking dependencies.
npx playbooks add skill snarktank/amp-skills --skill ralphReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: ralph
description: "Autonomous feature development - setup and execution. Triggers on: ralph, set up ralph, run ralph, run the loop, implement tasks. Two phases: (1) Setup - chat through feature, create tasks with dependencies (2) Loop - pick ready tasks, implement, commit, repeat until done."
---
# Ralph Feature Setup
Interactive feature planning that creates ralph-ready tasks with dependencies.
---
## The Job
**Two modes:**
### Mode 1: New Feature
1. Chat through the feature - Ask clarifying questions
2. Break into small tasks - Each completable in one iteration
3. Create task_list tasks - Parent + subtasks with `dependsOn`
4. Set up ralph files - Save parent ID, reset progress.txt
### Mode 2: Existing Tasks
1. Find existing parent task - Search or let user specify
2. Verify structure - Check subtasks have proper `dependsOn`
3. Set up ralph files - Save parent ID to parent-task-id.txt
4. Show status - Which tasks are ready, completed, blocked
**Ask the user which mode they need:**
```
Are you:
1. Starting a new feature (I'll help you plan and create tasks)
2. Using existing tasks (I'll set up Ralph to run them)
```
---
## Step 1: Understand the Feature
Start by asking the user about their feature. Don't assume - ASK:
```
What feature are you building?
```
Then ask clarifying questions:
- What's the user-facing goal?
- What parts of the codebase will this touch? (database, UI, API, etc.)
- Are there any existing patterns to follow?
- What should it look like when done?
**Keep asking until you have enough detail to break it into tasks.**
---
## Step 2: Break Into Tasks
**Each task must be completable in ONE Ralph iteration (~one context window).**
Ralph spawns a fresh Amp instance per iteration with no memory of previous work. If a task is too big, the LLM runs out of context before finishing.
### Right-sized tasks:
- Add a database column + migration
- Create a single UI component
- Implement one server action
- Add a filter to an existing list
- Write tests for one module
### Too big (split these):
- "Build the entire dashboard" → Split into: schema, queries, components, filters
- "Add authentication" → Split into: schema, middleware, login UI, session handling
- "Refactor the API" → Split into one task per endpoint
**Rule of thumb:** If you can't describe the change in 2-3 sentences, it's too big.
---
## Step 3: Order by Dependencies
Tasks execute based on `dependsOn`. Earlier tasks must complete before dependent ones start.
**Typical order:**
1. Schema/database changes (migrations)
2. Server actions / backend logic
3. UI components that use the backend
4. Integration / E2E tests
Use `dependsOn` to express this:
```
Task 1: Schema (no dependencies)
Task 2: Server action (dependsOn: [task-1])
Task 3: UI component (dependsOn: [task-2])
Task 4: Tests (dependsOn: [task-3])
```
Parallel tasks that don't depend on each other can share the same dependency.
---
## Step 4: Create Tasks
### First, create the parent task:
```
task_list create
title: "[Feature Name]"
description: "[One-line description of the feature]"
repoURL: "https://github.com/snarktank/untangle"
```
**Save the returned task ID** - you'll need it for subtasks.
### Then, create subtasks with parentID and dependsOn:
```
task_list create
title: "[Task title - action-oriented]"
description: "[Detailed description with:
- What to implement
- Files to create/modify
- Acceptance criteria
- How to verify (typecheck, tests, browser)]"
parentID: "<parent-task-id>"
dependsOn: ["<previous-task-id>"] // omit for first task
repoURL: "https://github.com/snarktank/untangle"
```
### Task description format:
Write descriptions that a future Ralph iteration can pick up without context:
```
Implement category name to ID mapping for expenses.
**What to do:**
- Create function mapExpenseCategoryNameToId(name, isChildExpense)
- Query item_category table with category_type filter
- Add alias mapping for common synonyms (rent → Rent or Mortgage)
**Files:**
- workflows/tools/upsert-expense.ts
**Acceptance criteria:**
- Function returns category ID for valid names
- Returns null for unknown categories
- npm run typecheck passes
**Notes:**
- Follow pattern from upsert-income.ts
- EXPENSE type for family, CHILD_EXPENSE for child
```
---
## Step 5: Set Up Ralph Files
After creating all tasks, **run the shared setup steps from "Final Setup (Required for Both Modes)" section.**
This ensures:
- Parent task ID is saved to `scripts/ralph/parent-task-id.txt`
- Previous progress.txt is archived if it has content
- Fresh progress.txt is created with Codebase Patterns preserved
---
## Step 6: Confirm Setup
Show the user what was created:
```
✅ Ralph is ready!
**Parent task:** [title] (ID: [id])
**Subtasks:**
1. [Task 1 title] - no dependencies
2. [Task 2 title] - depends on #1
3. [Task 3 title] - depends on #2
...
**To start Ralph:** Say "run ralph" or "start the loop" - I'll use handoff to execute the first ready task, and each task will hand off to the next until complete.
---
## Mode 2: Setting Up Existing Tasks
If the user already has tasks created, help them set up Ralph to run them.
### Find the parent task:
**First, check if a parent task is already saved:**
```bash
cat scripts/ralph/parent-task-id.txt
```
If this file exists and contains a task ID, use it! Verify it's valid by fetching the task:
```
task_list action: "get", taskID: "<id-from-file>"
```
**Only if no saved parent task exists**, ask the user:
```
What's the parent task? You can give me:
- The task ID directly
- A search term and I'll find it
- Or say "list recent" to see recent tasks
```
To search for tasks (always use limit to avoid context overflow):
```
task_list list
repoURL: "https://github.com/snarktank/untangle"
limit: 10
```
### Verify subtasks exist:
Once you have the parent ID, check for subtasks (always use limit):
```
task_list list
parentID: "<parent-task-id>"
limit: 10
```
If no subtasks found, the parent task might BE the work (not a container). Ask:
```
This task has no subtasks. Is this:
1. A parent task with subtasks I should find differently?
2. The actual work task (I should create it as a parent with this as the first subtask)?
```
### Check dependencies:
Review the subtasks and verify:
- Do they have `dependsOn` set correctly?
- Are there any circular dependencies?
- Is the first task(s) dependency-free so Ralph can start?
If dependencies are missing, offer to fix:
```
These tasks don't have dependencies set. Should I:
1. Add dependencies based on their order?
2. Leave them parallel (Ralph picks any ready task)?
```
### Set up ralph files:
**Run the shared setup steps from "Final Setup (Required for Both Modes)" section below.**
### Show status:
```
✅ Ralph is ready to use existing tasks!
**Parent task:** [title] (ID: [id])
**Status:**
- ✅ Completed: 3 tasks
- 🔄 Ready to work: 2 tasks
- ⏳ Blocked: 5 tasks (waiting on dependencies)
**Next task Ralph will pick:**
[Task title] - [brief description]
**To start Ralph:** Say "run ralph" or "start the loop"
---
## Final Setup (Required for Both Modes)
**ALWAYS run these steps after creating tasks OR setting up existing tasks:**
### 1. Save parent task ID:
```bash
echo "<parent-task-id>" > scripts/ralph/parent-task-id.txt
```
Verify it was saved:
```bash
cat scripts/ralph/parent-task-id.txt
```
### 2. Check if progress.txt needs archiving:
Read the current progress.txt:
```bash
cat scripts/ralph/progress.txt
```
**Archive if:**
- It has content beyond the header (learnings from a previous feature)
- The previous feature is different from the current one
**Archive command:**
```bash
DATE=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
FEATURE="previous-feature-name-here"
mkdir -p scripts/ralph/archive/$DATE-$FEATURE
cp scripts/ralph/progress.txt scripts/ralph/archive/$DATE-$FEATURE/
echo "Archived to scripts/ralph/archive/$DATE-$FEATURE/"
```
### 3. Reset progress.txt:
**Preserve useful Codebase Patterns** from the previous run, then reset:
```bash
cat > scripts/ralph/progress.txt << 'EOF'
# Ralph Progress Log
Started: [current date]
## Codebase Patterns
[Copy any patterns from previous run that are still relevant]
---
EOF
```
### 4. Verify setup is complete:
```bash
# Confirm parent ID is saved
cat scripts/ralph/parent-task-id.txt
# Confirm progress.txt is reset
head -10 scripts/ralph/progress.txt
# List subtasks to confirm they exist
# (use task_list list with parentID)
```
**Only after completing all 4 steps is Ralph ready to run.**
---
## Acceptance Criteria for Each Task
Each task description MUST include verifiable acceptance criteria:
### Good criteria (verifiable):
- "Add `investorType` column to investor table with default 'cold'"
- "Filter dropdown has options: All, Cold, Friend"
- "npm run typecheck passes"
- "npm test -- path/to/test.ts passes"
### Bad criteria (vague):
- ❌ "Works correctly"
- ❌ "Good UX"
- ❌ "Handles edge cases"
### Always include:
```
npm run typecheck passes
```
### For tasks with testable logic:
```
npm test passes
```
### For UI/browser tasks:
**For functional testing** (checking behavior, not appearance):
```
Use Chrome DevTools MCP with take_snapshot to read page content (NOT screenshots)
```
- `take_snapshot` returns the a11y tree as text that Ralph can read and verify
- `take_screenshot` returns images which Ralph cannot interpret for functional checks
- Only use screenshots when testing visual appearance/look and feel
**For visual testing** (checking appearance):
```
Use take_screenshot to capture and verify visual appearance
```
---
## Example Conversation
**User:** set up ralph for adding expense tracking to the legal agent
**Assistant:** What feature are you building?
**User:** I want Grace (our legal chat agent) to be able to create, update, and delete expenses when users mention them in conversation.
**Assistant:** Got it - an expense upsert tool for the legal agent. A few questions:
1. Are there existing tools in the legal agent I should follow as a pattern?
2. Do expenses have different types (family vs child)?
3. Should it also list expenses or just CRUD?
4. Any task completion logic needed?
**User:** Follow upsert-income.ts. Yes family and child expenses (different tables). Yes list too. Mark APP_EXPENSES_ENTERED task complete.
**Assistant:** Perfect. Here's my proposed breakdown:
1. **Create tool skeleton** - Zod schema, basic structure
2. **Category mapping** - Map names like "rent" to category IDs
3. **Amount parsing** - Handle currency formats, allow $0
4. **Duplicate detection** - Check before creating
5. **Create family expenses** - Insert into expense table
6. **Create child expenses** - Insert into child_expense table
7. **Update action** - Modify existing expenses
8. **Delete action** - Remove expenses
9. **List action** - Show all expenses with totals
10. **Task completion** - Mark APP_EXPENSES_ENTERED done
11. **Register tool** - Add to legal chat workflow
12. **UI progress indicator** - Show progress during tool use
13. **Unit tests** - Test helper functions
14. **E2E tests** - Test via chat interface
Does this look right? Any tasks to add or remove?
**User:** Looks good, create the tasks
**Assistant:** [Creates parent task, then subtasks with dependencies, saves parent-task-id.txt]
✅ Ralph is ready!
**Parent task:** Legal Agent Expense Upsert Tool (ID: task-abc123)
**Subtasks:** 14 tasks created with dependencies
**To start:** Say "run ralph" or "start the loop"
---
## How Ralph Completes
When all subtasks are completed:
1. Ralph marks the **parent task** as `completed`
2. Reports "✅ Build complete - all tasks finished!"
3. Summarizes what was accomplished
**Important:** Ralph uses `limit: 5` when querying tasks to avoid context overflow. If you have many subtasks, they'll be processed over multiple iterations.
---
## Checklist Before Creating Tasks
- [ ] Chatted through feature to understand scope
- [ ] Each task completable in one iteration (small enough)
- [ ] Tasks ordered by dependency (schema → backend → UI → tests)
- [ ] Every task has "npm run typecheck passes" in description
- [ ] UI tasks have browser verification in description
- [ ] Descriptions have enough detail for Ralph to implement without context
- [ ] Parent task ID saved to scripts/ralph/parent-task-id.txt
- [ ] Previous run archived if progress.txt had content
---
# Phase 2: The Execution Loop
Once setup is complete, Ralph runs the autonomous loop to implement tasks one by one.
---
## Loop Workflow
### 0. Get the parent task ID
First, read the parent task ID that scopes this feature:
```bash
cat scripts/ralph/parent-task-id.txt
```
If this file doesn't exist, ask the user which parent task to work on.
**Check if this is a new feature:** Compare the parent task ID to the one in `scripts/ralph/progress.txt` header. If they differ (or progress.txt doesn't exist), this is a NEW feature - reset progress.txt:
```markdown
# Build Progress Log
Started: [today's date]
Feature: [parent task title]
## Codebase Patterns
(Patterns discovered during this feature build)
---
```
This ensures each feature starts with a clean slate. Progress.txt is SHORT-TERM memory for the current feature only.
### 1. Check for ready tasks (with nested hierarchy support)
The task hierarchy may have multiple levels (parent → container → leaf tasks). Use this approach to find all descendant tasks:
**Step 1: Get all tasks for the repo**
```
task_list action: "list", repoURL: "<repo-url>", ready: true, status: "open", limit: 10
```
**Important:** Always use `limit` (5-10) to avoid context overflow with many tasks.
**Step 2: Build the descendant set**
Starting from the parent task ID, collect all tasks that are descendants:
1. Find tasks where `parentID` equals the parent task ID (direct children)
2. For each child found, recursively find their children
3. Continue until no more descendants are found
**Step 3: Filter to workable tasks**
From the descendant set, select tasks that are:
- `ready: true` (all dependencies satisfied)
- `status: "open"`
- Leaf tasks (no children of their own) - these are the actual work items
**CRITICAL:** Skip container tasks that exist only to group other tasks. A container task has other tasks with its ID as their `parentID`.
### 2. If no ready tasks
Check if all descendant tasks are completed:
- Query `task_list list` with `repoURL: "<repo-url>"` (no ready filter)
- Build the full descendant set (same recursive approach as step 1)
- If all leaf tasks in the descendant set are `completed`:
1. Archive progress.txt:
```bash
DATE=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
FEATURE="feature-name-here"
mkdir -p scripts/ralph/archive/$DATE-$FEATURE
mv scripts/ralph/progress.txt scripts/ralph/archive/$DATE-$FEATURE/
```
2. Create fresh progress.txt with empty template
3. Clear parent-task-id.txt: `echo "" > scripts/ralph/parent-task-id.txt`
4. Commit: `git add scripts/ralph && git commit -m "chore: archive progress for [feature-name]"`
5. Mark the parent task as `completed`
6. Stop and report "✅ Build complete - all tasks finished!"
- If some are blocked: Report which tasks are blocked and why
### 3. If ready tasks exist
**Pick the next task:**
- Prefer tasks related to what was just completed (same module/area, dependent work)
- If no prior context, pick the first ready task
**Execute the task:**
Use the `handoff` tool with this goal:
```
Implement and verify task [task-id]: [task-title].
[task-description]
FIRST: Read scripts/ralph/progress.txt - check the "Codebase Patterns" section for important context from previous iterations.
When complete:
1. Run quality checks: `npm run typecheck` and `npm test`
- If either fails, FIX THE ISSUES and re-run until both pass
- Do NOT proceed until quality checks pass
2. Update AGENTS.md files if you learned something important:
- Check for AGENTS.md in directories where you edited files
- Add learnings that future developers/agents should know (patterns, gotchas, dependencies)
- This is LONG-TERM memory - things anyone editing this code should know
- Do NOT add task-specific details or temporary notes
3. Update progress.txt (APPEND, never replace) - this is SHORT-TERM memory for the current feature:
```
## [Date] - [Task Title]
Thread: [current thread URL]
Task ID: [task-id]
- What was implemented
- Files changed
- **Learnings for future iterations:**
- Patterns discovered
- Gotchas encountered
- Useful context
---
```
4. If you discovered a reusable pattern for THIS FEATURE, add it to the `## Codebase Patterns` section at the TOP of progress.txt
5. Commit all changes with message: `feat: [Task Title]`
6. Mark task as completed: `task_list action: "update", taskID: "[task-id]", status: "completed"`
7. Invoke the ralph skill to continue the loop
```
---
## Progress File Format
```markdown
# Build Progress Log
Started: [date]
Feature: [feature name]
Parent Task: [parent-task-id]
## Codebase Patterns
(Patterns discovered during this feature build)
---
## [Date] - [Task Title]
Thread: https://ampcode.com/threads/[thread-id]
Task ID: [id]
- What was implemented
- Files changed
- **Learnings for future iterations:**
- Patterns discovered
- Gotchas encountered
---
```
**Note:** When a new feature starts with a different parent task ID, reset progress.txt completely. Long-term learnings belong in AGENTS.md files, not progress.txt.
---
## Task Discovery
While working, **liberally create new tasks** when you discover:
- Failing tests or test gaps
- Code that needs refactoring
- Missing error handling
- Documentation gaps
- TODOs or FIXMEs in the code
- Build/lint warnings
- Performance issues
Use `task_list action: "create"` immediately. Set appropriate `dependsOn` relationships.
---
## Browser Verification
For UI tasks, specify the right verification method:
**Functional testing** (checking behavior, not appearance):
```
Use agent-browser with snapshot -i to read page content
```
- `agent-browser snapshot -i` returns interactive elements with refs that can be verified
- Use for: button exists, text appears, form works
- Example: `agent-browser snapshot -i | grep "Submit"` to verify button exists
**Visual testing** (checking appearance):
```
Use agent-browser screenshot to capture and verify visual appearance
```
- `agent-browser screenshot tmp/result.png` saves a screenshot
- Use for: layout, colors, styling, animations
---
## Quality Requirements
Before marking any task complete:
- `npm run typecheck` must pass
- `npm test` must pass
- Changes must be committed
- Progress must be logged
---
## Stop Condition
When no ready tasks remain AND all tasks are completed:
1. Output: "✅ Build complete - all tasks finished!"
2. Summarize what was accomplished
---
## Important Notes
- Always use `ready: true` when listing tasks to only get tasks with satisfied dependencies
- Always use `limit: 5-10` when listing tasks to avoid context overflow
- Each handoff runs in a fresh thread with clean context
- Progress.txt is the memory between iterations - keep it updated
- Prefer tasks in the same area as just-completed work for better context continuity
- The handoff goal MUST include instructions to update progress.txt, commit, and re-invoke this skill
This skill automates feature planning and autonomous execution in two phases: setup and loop. It guides you through creating small, ralph-ready tasks with clear dependencies, saves the parent task context, and then runs a repeatable loop that picks ready tasks, implements them, commits, and moves to the next until the feature is complete.
In Setup mode the assistant asks clarifying questions, breaks the feature into right-sized tasks, creates a parent task and subtasks with dependsOn, and writes the parent-task-id and a fresh progress.txt to scripts/ralph. In Loop mode the agent reads the saved parent-task-id, finds ready leaf tasks (respecting dependsOn), runs each task in a fresh Amp instance, verifies acceptance criteria, commits changes, updates progress, and repeats until all tasks complete.
How does Ralph decide which task to run next?
Ralph lists descendant tasks of the saved parent, filters for open, ready leaf tasks (no children) and picks one that has all dependencies satisfied.
What must each task description include?
A clear what-to-do section, files to modify, acceptance criteria (including npm run typecheck), verification steps, and any patterns to follow.