home / skills / sickn33 / antigravity-awesome-skills / performance-testing-review-multi-agent-review

performance-testing-review-multi-agent-review skill

/skills/performance-testing-review-multi-agent-review

This skill coordinates multi-agent performance reviews, routing specialized analysts to assess code, architecture, and testing for a unified, actionable

This is most likely a fork of the performance-testing-review-multi-agent-review skill from xfstudio
npx playbooks add skill sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill performance-testing-review-multi-agent-review

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (1)
SKILL.md
6.6 KB
---
name: performance-testing-review-multi-agent-review
description: "Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review"
---

# Multi-Agent Code Review Orchestration Tool

## Use this skill when

- Working on multi-agent code review orchestration tool tasks or workflows
- Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for multi-agent code review orchestration tool

## Do not use this skill when

- The task is unrelated to multi-agent code review orchestration tool
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope

## Instructions

- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open `resources/implementation-playbook.md`.

## Role: Expert Multi-Agent Review Orchestration Specialist

A sophisticated AI-powered code review system designed to provide comprehensive, multi-perspective analysis of software artifacts through intelligent agent coordination and specialized domain expertise.

## Context and Purpose

The Multi-Agent Review Tool leverages a distributed, specialized agent network to perform holistic code assessments that transcend traditional single-perspective review approaches. By coordinating agents with distinct expertise, we generate a comprehensive evaluation that captures nuanced insights across multiple critical dimensions:

- **Depth**: Specialized agents dive deep into specific domains
- **Breadth**: Parallel processing enables comprehensive coverage
- **Intelligence**: Context-aware routing and intelligent synthesis
- **Adaptability**: Dynamic agent selection based on code characteristics

## Tool Arguments and Configuration

### Input Parameters
- `$ARGUMENTS`: Target code/project for review
  - Supports: File paths, Git repositories, code snippets
  - Handles multiple input formats
  - Enables context extraction and agent routing

### Agent Types
1. Code Quality Reviewers
2. Security Auditors
3. Architecture Specialists
4. Performance Analysts
5. Compliance Validators
6. Best Practices Experts

## Multi-Agent Coordination Strategy

### 1. Agent Selection and Routing Logic
- **Dynamic Agent Matching**:
  - Analyze input characteristics
  - Select most appropriate agent types
  - Configure specialized sub-agents dynamically
- **Expertise Routing**:
  ```python
  def route_agents(code_context):
      agents = []
      if is_web_application(code_context):
          agents.extend([
              "security-auditor",
              "web-architecture-reviewer"
          ])
      if is_performance_critical(code_context):
          agents.append("performance-analyst")
      return agents
  ```

### 2. Context Management and State Passing
- **Contextual Intelligence**:
  - Maintain shared context across agent interactions
  - Pass refined insights between agents
  - Support incremental review refinement
- **Context Propagation Model**:
  ```python
  class ReviewContext:
      def __init__(self, target, metadata):
          self.target = target
          self.metadata = metadata
          self.agent_insights = {}

      def update_insights(self, agent_type, insights):
          self.agent_insights[agent_type] = insights
  ```

### 3. Parallel vs Sequential Execution
- **Hybrid Execution Strategy**:
  - Parallel execution for independent reviews
  - Sequential processing for dependent insights
  - Intelligent timeout and fallback mechanisms
- **Execution Flow**:
  ```python
  def execute_review(review_context):
      # Parallel independent agents
      parallel_agents = [
          "code-quality-reviewer",
          "security-auditor"
      ]

      # Sequential dependent agents
      sequential_agents = [
          "architecture-reviewer",
          "performance-optimizer"
      ]
  ```

### 4. Result Aggregation and Synthesis
- **Intelligent Consolidation**:
  - Merge insights from multiple agents
  - Resolve conflicting recommendations
  - Generate unified, prioritized report
- **Synthesis Algorithm**:
  ```python
  def synthesize_review_insights(agent_results):
      consolidated_report = {
          "critical_issues": [],
          "important_issues": [],
          "improvement_suggestions": []
      }
      # Intelligent merging logic
      return consolidated_report
  ```

### 5. Conflict Resolution Mechanism
- **Smart Conflict Handling**:
  - Detect contradictory agent recommendations
  - Apply weighted scoring
  - Escalate complex conflicts
- **Resolution Strategy**:
  ```python
  def resolve_conflicts(agent_insights):
      conflict_resolver = ConflictResolutionEngine()
      return conflict_resolver.process(agent_insights)
  ```

### 6. Performance Optimization
- **Efficiency Techniques**:
  - Minimal redundant processing
  - Cached intermediate results
  - Adaptive agent resource allocation
- **Optimization Approach**:
  ```python
  def optimize_review_process(review_context):
      return ReviewOptimizer.allocate_resources(review_context)
  ```

### 7. Quality Validation Framework
- **Comprehensive Validation**:
  - Cross-agent result verification
  - Statistical confidence scoring
  - Continuous learning and improvement
- **Validation Process**:
  ```python
  def validate_review_quality(review_results):
      quality_score = QualityScoreCalculator.compute(review_results)
      return quality_score > QUALITY_THRESHOLD
  ```

## Example Implementations

### 1. Parallel Code Review Scenario
```python
multi_agent_review(
    target="/path/to/project",
    agents=[
        {"type": "security-auditor", "weight": 0.3},
        {"type": "architecture-reviewer", "weight": 0.3},
        {"type": "performance-analyst", "weight": 0.2}
    ]
)
```

### 2. Sequential Workflow
```python
sequential_review_workflow = [
    {"phase": "design-review", "agent": "architect-reviewer"},
    {"phase": "implementation-review", "agent": "code-quality-reviewer"},
    {"phase": "testing-review", "agent": "test-coverage-analyst"},
    {"phase": "deployment-readiness", "agent": "devops-validator"}
]
```

### 3. Hybrid Orchestration
```python
hybrid_review_strategy = {
    "parallel_agents": ["security", "performance"],
    "sequential_agents": ["architecture", "compliance"]
}
```

## Reference Implementations

1. **Web Application Security Review**
2. **Microservices Architecture Validation**

## Best Practices and Considerations

- Maintain agent independence
- Implement robust error handling
- Use probabilistic routing
- Support incremental reviews
- Ensure privacy and security

## Extensibility

The tool is designed with a plugin-based architecture, allowing easy addition of new agent types and review strategies.

## Invocation

Target for review: $ARGUMENTS

Overview

This skill coordinates multiple specialized agents to perform comprehensive, parallelized code reviews and synthesize actionable, prioritized findings. It focuses on routing the right experts, maintaining shared context, resolving conflicting recommendations, and producing a unified report for faster, higher-confidence analysis. Use it to turn complex codebases into targeted, verifiable remediation plans.

How this skill works

The skill analyzes the target code or repository, selects a set of specialist agents (security, performance, architecture, etc.), and routes context to each agent. Independent agents can run in parallel while dependent agents execute sequentially; insights are aggregated, weighted, and reconciled into a single consolidated review. It supports caching, timeouts, and a validation step that computes quality and confidence scores.

When to use it

  • Orchestrating multi-perspective reviews of a codebase or PR
  • Validating security, performance, and architecture together
  • Scaling code review across large or heterogeneous projects
  • Automating repeatable review workflows for CI/CD pipelines
  • Producing a single prioritized remediation plan from multiple reviewers

Best practices

  • Clarify goals, inputs, and constraints before running reviews
  • Dynamically select agents based on code characteristics and risk profile
  • Use parallel execution for independent checks and sequential flow for dependent tasks
  • Cache intermediate results and set timeouts to reduce redundant work
  • Apply weighted scoring and escalation for conflicting recommendations
  • Continuously validate results and tune agent weights based on feedback

Example use cases

  • Security and architecture review for a new web application repository
  • Performance-focused audit for latency-sensitive microservices
  • Hybrid workflow: parallel security + performance, then sequential architecture and compliance
  • Automated PR gate: run multi-agent review and fail PRs that exceed risk thresholds
  • Compliance validation across multiple modules before a release

FAQ

What input formats are supported?

File paths, Git repositories, and code snippets are supported; the skill extracts context and routes agents automatically.

How are conflicts between agents resolved?

The tool applies weighted scoring, conflict detection, and an escalation mechanism; complex conflicts are flagged for human review.

Can I add custom agent types?

Yes. The plugin-style architecture lets you register new agent types and customize routing and weighting.