home / skills / sickn33 / antigravity-awesome-skills / design-orchestration

design-orchestration skill

/skills/design-orchestration

This skill orchestrates design workflows by routing brainstorming, reviews, and execution readiness to prevent premature implementation and ensure validated

This is most likely a fork of the design-orchestration skill from xfstudio
npx playbooks add skill sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill design-orchestration

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (1)
SKILL.md
3.4 KB
---
name: design-orchestration
description: >
  Orchestrates design workflows by routing work through
  brainstorming, multi-agent review, and execution readiness
  in the correct order. Prevents premature implementation,
  skipped validation, and unreviewed high-risk designs.
---

# Design Orchestration (Meta-Skill)

## Purpose

Ensure that **ideas become designs**, **designs are reviewed**, and
**only validated designs reach implementation**.

This skill does not generate designs.
It **controls the flow between other skills**.

---

## Operating Model

This is a **routing and enforcement skill**, not a creative one.

It decides:
- which skill must run next
- whether escalation is required
- whether execution is permitted

---

## Controlled Skills

This meta-skill coordinates the following:

- `brainstorming` — design generation
- `multi-agent-brainstorming` — design validation
- downstream implementation or planning skills

---

## Entry Conditions

Invoke this skill when:
- a user proposes a new feature, system, or change
- a design decision carries meaningful risk
- correctness matters more than speed

---

## Routing Logic

### Step 1 — Brainstorming (Mandatory)

If no validated design exists:

- Invoke `brainstorming`
- Require:
  - Understanding Lock
  - Initial Design
  - Decision Log started

You may NOT proceed without these artifacts.

---

### Step 2 — Risk Assessment

After brainstorming completes, classify the design as:

- **Low risk**
- **Moderate risk**
- **High risk**

Use factors such as:
- user impact
- irreversibility
- operational cost
- complexity
- uncertainty
- novelty

---

### Step 3 — Conditional Escalation

- **Low risk**  
  → Proceed to implementation planning

- **Moderate risk**  
  → Recommend `multi-agent-brainstorming`

- **High risk**  
  → REQUIRE `multi-agent-brainstorming`

Skipping escalation when required is prohibited.

---

### Step 4 — Multi-Agent Review (If Invoked)

If `multi-agent-brainstorming` is run:

Require:
- completed Understanding Lock
- current Design
- Decision Log

Do NOT allow:
- new ideation
- scope expansion
- reopening problem definition

Only critique, revision, and decision resolution are allowed.

---

### Step 5 — Execution Readiness Check

Before allowing implementation:

Confirm:
- design is approved (single-agent or multi-agent)
- Decision Log is complete
- major assumptions are documented
- known risks are acknowledged

If any condition fails:
- block execution
- return to the appropriate skill

---

## Enforcement Rules

- Do NOT allow implementation without a validated design
- Do NOT allow skipping required review
- Do NOT allow silent escalation or de-escalation
- Do NOT merge design and implementation phases

---

## Exit Conditions

This meta-skill exits ONLY when:
- the next step is explicitly identified, AND
- all required prior steps are complete

Possible exits:
- “Proceed to implementation planning”
- “Run multi-agent-brainstorming”
- “Return to brainstorming for clarification”
- "If a reviewed design reports a final disposition of APPROVED, REVISE, or REJECT, you MUST route the workflow accordingly and state the chosen next step explicitly."
---

## Design Philosophy

This skill exists to:
- slow down the right decisions
- speed up the right execution
- prevent costly mistakes

Good systems fail early.
Bad systems fail in production.

This meta-skill exists to enforce the former.

Overview

This skill orchestrates design workflows by routing work through brainstorming, multi-agent review, and execution-readiness checks in the correct order. It enforces required artifacts and reviews so only validated, risk-appropriate designs proceed to implementation. The skill prevents premature implementation, skipped validation, and unreviewed high-risk changes.

How this skill works

This is a routing and enforcement meta-skill that decides which skill runs next, whether escalation is required, and whether execution is permitted. It mandates an initial brainstorming phase, performs a risk classification, conditionally invokes multi-agent review, and blocks implementation until execution-readiness criteria are met. The skill only permits critique, revision, and decision resolution during reviews and never mixes ideation with implementation.

When to use it

  • When a user proposes a new feature, system, or significant change
  • When a design decision carries meaningful risk or uncertainty
  • When correctness, safety, or reversibility matter more than speed
  • Before approving work that will affect production or critical systems
  • When you need to enforce traceable decision logs and documented assumptions

Best practices

  • Always start with a clear Understanding Lock, Initial Design, and Decision Log before proceeding
  • Classify risk using user impact, irreversibility, operational cost, complexity, uncertainty, and novelty
  • Invoke multi-agent review for moderate risk and require it for high risk; never skip required escalation
  • During multi-agent review, prohibit new ideation or scope expansion—allow only critique, revision, and decisions
  • Block implementation until approval, completed Decision Log, documented assumptions, and acknowledged risks are present

Example use cases

  • Routing a proposed API design through single-agent brainstorming, risk assessment, and conditional multi-agent review
  • Enforcing review requirements for a migration that could be irreversible or cause downtime
  • Preventing a team from merging a high-risk change without a completed decision log and explicit approval
  • Running a final execution-readiness check before handoff to implementation or release planning
  • Handling disposition outcomes (APPROVED, REVISE, REJECT) and routing the workflow to the next explicit step

FAQ

What artifacts are mandatory to start the flow?

Understanding Lock, an Initial Design, and a started Decision Log are required to proceed beyond brainstorming.

When is multi-agent review required versus recommended?

Moderate risk triggers a recommendation for multi-agent review; high risk requires it. Low risk can proceed to implementation planning if all artifacts and approvals exist.