home / skills / sickn33 / antigravity-awesome-skills / clean-code
This skill applies Clean Code principles to writing, reviewing, and refactoring Python code for readability and maintainability.
npx playbooks add skill sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill clean-codeReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: clean-code
description: "Applies principles from Robert C. Martin's 'Clean Code'. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to ensure high quality, readability, and maintainability. Covers naming, functions, comments, error handling, and class design."
user-invocable: true
risk: safe
source: "ClawForge (https://github.com/jackjin1997/ClawForge)"
---
# Clean Code Skill
This skill embodies the principles of "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob). Use it to transform "code that works" into "code that is clean."
## đź§ Core Philosophy
> "Code is clean if it can be read, and enhanced by a developer other than its original author." — Grady Booch
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- **Writing new code**: To ensure high quality from the start.
- **Reviewing Pull Requests**: To provide constructive, principle-based feedback.
- **Refactoring legacy code**: To identify and remove code smells.
- **Improving team standards**: To align on industry-standard best practices.
## 1. Meaningful Names
- **Use Intention-Revealing Names**: `elapsedTimeInDays` instead of `d`.
- **Avoid Disinformation**: Don't use `accountList` if it's actually a `Map`.
- **Make Meaningful Distinctions**: Avoid `ProductData` vs `ProductInfo`.
- **Use Pronounceable/Searchable Names**: Avoid `genymdhms`.
- **Class Names**: Use nouns (`Customer`, `WikiPage`). Avoid `Manager`, `Data`.
- **Method Names**: Use verbs (`postPayment`, `deletePage`).
## 2. Functions
- **Small!**: Functions should be shorter than you think.
- **Do One Thing**: A function should do only one thing, and do it well.
- **One Level of Abstraction**: Don't mix high-level business logic with low-level details (like regex).
- **Descriptive Names**: `isPasswordValid` is better than `check`.
- **Arguments**: 0 is ideal, 1-2 is okay, 3+ requires a very strong justification.
- **No Side Effects**: Functions shouldn't secretly change global state.
## 3. Comments
- **Don't Comment Bad Code—Rewrite It**: Most comments are a sign of failure to express ourselves in code.
- **Explain Yourself in Code**:
```python
# Check if employee is eligible for full benefits
if employee.flags & HOURLY and employee.age > 65:
```
vs
```python
if employee.isEligibleForFullBenefits():
```
- **Good Comments**: Legal, Informative (regex intent), Clarification (external libraries), TODOs.
- **Bad Comments**: Mumbling, Redundant, Misleading, Mandated, Noise, Position Markers.
## 4. Formatting
- **The Newspaper Metaphor**: High-level concepts at the top, details at the bottom.
- **Vertical Density**: Related lines should be close to each other.
- **Distance**: Variables should be declared near their usage.
- **Indentation**: Essential for structural readability.
## 5. Objects and Data Structures
- **Data Abstraction**: Hide the implementation behind interfaces.
- **The Law of Demeter**: A module should not know about the innards of the objects it manipulates. Avoid `a.getB().getC().doSomething()`.
- **Data Transfer Objects (DTO)**: Classes with public variables and no functions.
## 6. Error Handling
- **Use Exceptions instead of Return Codes**: Keeps logic clean.
- **Write Try-Catch-Finally First**: Defines the scope of the operation.
- **Don't Return Null**: It forces the caller to check for null every time.
- **Don't Pass Null**: Leads to `NullPointerException`.
## 7. Unit Tests
- **The Three Laws of TDD**:
1. Don't write production code until you have a failing unit test.
2. Don't write more of a unit test than is sufficient to fail.
3. Don't write more production code than is sufficient to pass the failing test.
- **F.I.R.S.T. Principles**: Fast, Independent, Repeatable, Self-Validating, Timely.
## 8. Classes
- **Small!**: Classes should have a single responsibility (SRP).
- **The Stepdown Rule**: We want the code to read like a top-down narrative.
## 9. Smells and Heuristics
- **Rigidity**: Hard to change.
- **Fragility**: Breaks in many places.
- **Immobility**: Hard to reuse.
- **Viscosity**: Hard to do the right thing.
- **Needless Complexity/Repetition**.
## 🛠️ Implementation Checklist
- [ ] Is this function smaller than 20 lines?
- [ ] Does this function do exactly one thing?
- [ ] Are all names searchable and intention-revealing?
- [ ] Have I avoided comments by making the code clearer?
- [ ] Am I passing too many arguments?
- [ ] Is there a failing test for this change?
This skill applies the core principles from Robert C. Martin's Clean Code to help you write, review, and refactor code for greater readability, maintainability, and correctness. It focuses on naming, small functions and classes, comments, error handling, and unit testing to turn "code that works" into code other developers can confidently change.
The skill inspects code and recommends concrete changes: better names, smaller functions and classes, removal or replacement of misleading comments, clearer control flow, safer error handling, and appropriate tests. It also provides a short checklist and targeted heuristics for common code smells (rigidity, fragility, needless complexity) and prescribes corrective patterns like single-responsibility extraction, DTOs, and Law of Demeter fixes.
Does this skill enforce a specific style guide?
No. It recommends clean-code principles (names, small units, tests) that complement any style guide; it focuses on intent and maintainability rather than formatting rules.
When should I keep a comment instead of rewriting code?
Keep comments that document legal constraints, explain non-obvious algorithmic intent (e.g., regex intent), or clarify external library quirks. Otherwise prefer expressive names and small functions.