home / skills / shipshitdev / library / cofounder-evaluator
This skill helps you evaluate potential co-founders and equity arrangements using a structured compatibility framework for founder alignment.
npx playbooks add skill shipshitdev/library --skill cofounder-evaluatorReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: cofounder-evaluator
description: Use this skill when users need to evaluate potential co-founders, assess founder compatibility, design equity splits, or navigate co-founder relationships. Activates for "should I work with this person," "co-founder fit," "equity split," or founding team questions.
version: 1.0.0
tags:
- business
- hexa
- cofounder
- team
- equity
- partnership
- founding
auto_activate: true
---
# Co-Founder Evaluator - Founding Team Assessment
## Overview
Help founders make the critical decision of choosing (or validating) a co-founder using Hexa's methodology. Execute rigorous compatibility assessment through skills analysis, values alignment, and equity frameworks.
**Hexa Principle:** "Co-founder matching is one of the biggest predictors of startup success."
## When This Activates
- "Should I work with this person"
- Finding a co-founder
- Co-founder fit/compatibility
- Equity splits
- "Do I need a co-founder"
- Co-founder conflict/concerns
- Solo vs. partnering
## Evaluation Stack (Bottom Up)
1. **Skills Complement** - What each brings
2. **Vision Alignment** - Where you want to go
3. **Values Alignment** - What you believe matters
4. **Working Style** - How you collaborate daily
## Solo vs. Co-founder
| Favors Solo | Favors Co-founder |
|-------------|-------------------|
| 80%+ skills covered | Major skill gaps |
| Move fast alone | Need parallel execution |
| Prefer autonomy | Value debate/input |
| Strong network | Need complementary network |
| Bootstrapping | Raising (investors like teams) |
**5+ either way:** Follow that direction
## Skills Matrix
Rate 1-5 for: Technical, Sales, Marketing, Finance/Ops, Leadership, Domain, Fundraising, Recruiting
**Ideal:** No overlaps >4, no gaps <2
## Founder Archetypes
| Type | Best Paired With |
|------|------------------|
| Builder | Seller or Operator |
| Seller | Builder or Operator |
| Operator | Builder or Seller |
| Visionary | Executor |
## Vision Alignment Questions
- 5-year vision?
- Company size goal?
- Exit preference ($10M vs $1B)?
- Time commitment?
**Red Flag:** Different answers = discuss before proceeding
## Trial Period (8-12 weeks)
1. Coffee chats (2-4 weeks)
2. Mini project (2-4 weeks)
3. Full immersion (4-8 weeks)
4. Decision
**Must pass:** Delivered commitments, proactive communication, resolved disagreement, excited to continue
## Equity Split Rules
- When in doubt: 50/50
- Always vest (4yr/1yr cliff)
- Get it in writing
| Situation | Split |
|-----------|-------|
| Equal contribution | 50/50 |
| Idea + domain vs. execution | 55/45 - 60/40 |
| Full-time vs. part-time | 60/40 - 70/30 |
## Red Flags (Stop)
- History of co-founder disputes
- Different commitment levels
- Can't resolve disagreements
- Reference concerns
- Gut says no
- Unwilling to vest
## The 7-10 Year Question
> "Would I want to work closely with this person, through extreme stress, for 7-10 years?"
If not enthusiastic yes, keep looking.
## Integration
- `early-hiring-advisor` - Build team after founding
- `idea-validator` - Validate idea together
- `execution-accelerator` - Make the decision
---
**For complete assessment matrices, reference questions, agreement checklist, output templates, and common mistakes, see:** `references/full-guide.md`
This skill helps founders decide whether to work with a potential co-founder by running a structured compatibility and equity assessment. It uses a practical stack—skills, vision, values, and working style—plus trial periods and equity rules to produce clear recommendations. The outcome is a defensible go/no-go decision and actionable next steps for equity and agreements.
The evaluator inspects complementary skills, alignment on long-term vision, shared values, and daily working styles. It guides a staged trial (coffee chats, mini project, full immersion) to validate real-world collaboration. Finally, it recommends equity splits, vesting terms, and red-flag checks to protect founders and friendships.
What if skills overlap heavily?
Aim to avoid overlaps >4 on the skills matrix; if overlap is high, clarify roles or add a complementary hire instead of duplicating co-founder roles.
How strict should I be about vesting?
Very strict—always vest with a 4-year schedule and a 1-year cliff. Vesting protects both parties and preserves incentives.