home / skills / sandraschi / advanced-memory-mcp / discrete-mathematics-expert

discrete-mathematics-expert skill

/skills/mathematics/discrete-mathematics-expert

This skill helps you analyze and optimize discrete mathematics concepts for algorithms and data structures in computer science.

npx playbooks add skill sandraschi/advanced-memory-mcp --skill discrete-mathematics-expert

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (6)
SKILL.md
1.2 KB
---
name: discrete-mathematics-expert
description: Expert in combinatorics, graph theory, discrete probability, and algorithms with applications to computer science
license: Proprietary
---

# Discrete Mathematics Expert
> **Status**: ⚠️ Legacy template awaiting research upgrade
> **Last validated**: 2025-11-08
> **Confidence**: 🔴 Low — Legacy template awaiting research upgrade

## How to use this skill
1. Start with [modules/research-checklist.md](modules/research-checklist.md) and capture up-to-date sources.
2. Review [modules/known-gaps.md](modules/known-gaps.md) and resolve outstanding items.
3. Load topic-specific modules from [_toc.md](_toc.md) only after verification.
4. Update metadata when confidence improves.

## Module overview
- [Core guidance](modules/core-guidance.md) — legacy instructions preserved for review
- [Known gaps](modules/known-gaps.md) — validation tasks and open questions
- [Research checklist](modules/research-checklist.md) — mandatory workflow for freshness

## Research status
- Fresh web research pending (conversion captured on 2025-11-08).
- Document all new sources inside `the Source Log` and the research checklist.
- Do not rely on this skill until confidence is upgraded to `medium` or `high`.

Overview

This skill is an expert assistant for discrete mathematics focused on combinatorics, graph theory, discrete probability, and algorithmic techniques used in computer science. It codifies core guidance and validation tasks but currently exists as a legacy template that requires fresh research and verification. Treat outputs as provisional until the skill's confidence level is upgraded through documented source updates.

How this skill works

The skill inspects problem statements and provides structured methods: counting arguments, bijections, recurrence relations, probabilistic methods, graph modeling, and algorithmic reductions. It flags open validation items and lists known gaps that must be resolved with current literature. Users are expected to supply or validate up-to-date references before relying on critical results.

When to use it

  • When you need step-by-step combinatorial proofs or counting strategies.
  • For modeling problems as graphs and extracting algorithmic properties.
  • To design or analyze randomized algorithms and discrete probabilistic bounds.
  • When preparing lecture notes, problem sets, or technical explanations in CS contexts.
  • If you want a checklist for validating discrete-math claims against current research.

Best practices

  • Provide precise problem statements and constraints to avoid ambiguous combinatorial cases.
  • Cross-check important theorems with recent sources before using in production or publication.
  • Request worked examples to verify method applicability to edge cases.
  • Use graph models with clear node/edge semantics and specify whether graphs are directed, weighted, or labeled.
  • Document any external references you add so confidence can be upgraded later.

Example use cases

  • Derive closed-form counts for combinatorial objects (permutations with restrictions, partitions).
  • Prove properties of graph connectivity, matchings, coloring, and shortest-path variants.
  • Estimate tail bounds for sums of discrete random variables in algorithm analysis.
  • Convert a CS problem into a discrete-math formulation to guide algorithm design.
  • Create a validation checklist for classroom or research problem sets.

FAQ

Is this skill authoritative for publication-level claims?

No. The skill is a legacy template and should not be the sole authority for publication-level claims until its source log and confidence are updated.

What should I do if I need high-confidence results now?

Supply up-to-date references or ask for the specific theorems and I will indicate where fresh literature checks are required before you rely on them.