playbooks

home / skills / sandraschi / advanced-memory-mcp / analytic-philosophy-expert

analytic-philosophy-expert skill

/skills/philosophy/analytic-philosophy-expert

This skill helps analyze analytic philosophy topics and curate up-to-date sources, gaps, and metadata for rigorous research workflows.

npx playbooks add skill sandraschi/advanced-memory-mcp --skill analytic-philosophy-expert

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (6)
SKILL.md
1.2 KB
---
name: analytic-philosophy-expert
description: Expert in Anglo-American analytic tradition covering logic, language, mind, and epistemology from Frege to contemporary philosophy
license: Proprietary
---

# Analytic Philosophy Expert
> **Status**: ⚠️ Legacy template awaiting research upgrade
> **Last validated**: 2025-11-08
> **Confidence**: 🔴 Low — Legacy template awaiting research upgrade

## How to use this skill
1. Start with [modules/research-checklist.md](modules/research-checklist.md) and capture up-to-date sources.
2. Review [modules/known-gaps.md](modules/known-gaps.md) and resolve outstanding items.
3. Load topic-specific modules from [_toc.md](_toc.md) only after verification.
4. Update metadata when confidence improves.

## Module overview
- [Core guidance](modules/core-guidance.md) — legacy instructions preserved for review
- [Known gaps](modules/known-gaps.md) — validation tasks and open questions
- [Research checklist](modules/research-checklist.md) — mandatory workflow for freshness

## Research status
- Fresh web research pending (conversion captured on 2025-11-08).
- Document all new sources inside `the Source Log` and the research checklist.
- Do not rely on this skill until confidence is upgraded to `medium` or `high`.

Overview

This skill is an expert agent for the Anglo-American analytic tradition, covering logic, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, and epistemology from Frege to contemporary figures. It helps map arguments, identify conceptual distinctions, and assemble up-to-date reading and research tasks. Use it to get precise, citation-focused guidance when working on analytic-philosophy projects.

How this skill works

The skill inspects texts, arguments, and bibliographies to extract premises, inferential moves, and conceptual roles. It highlights gaps in evidence or genealogy, proposes primary and secondary sources, and generates concise summaries or argument maps. When configured for research, it produces checklists and provenance notes to support verification and updates.

When to use it

  • Preparing literature reviews or reading lists in logic, language, mind, or epistemology
  • Drafting clear reconstructions of arguments and spotting hidden premises
  • Designing syllabi, lecture notes, or study guides for analytic topics
  • Checking philosophical claims against primary sources and canonical debates
  • Organizing research tasks and provenance tracking for ongoing projects

Best practices

  • Validate suggested sources against primary texts and recent scholarship before citing
  • Keep a running source log with dates and retrieval metadata for reproducibility
  • Resolve flagged knowledge gaps by assigning focused verification tasks
  • Prefer precise quotations and page references when reconstructing arguments
  • Annotate argument maps with counterarguments and plausibility ratings

Example use cases

  • Generate a targeted reading list on Frege’s theory of sense and reference with primary and secondary sources
  • Produce a step-by-step reconstruction of a classic epistemology argument, noting assumptions and rebuttals
  • Create a lecture outline comparing Davidsonian and contemporary views on language and thought
  • Map contemporary debates about consciousness into positions, key objections, and representative papers
  • Compile a research checklist to upgrade confidence level from legacy status to fully verified

FAQ

How reliable are the skill’s recommendations?

Recommendations are research-informed but require verification against primary sources and recent literature; treat them as structured starting points, not final authority.

How do I improve the skill’s confidence for my project?

Systematically add and log verified sources, resolve listed knowledge gaps, and rerun the research checklist to raise the confidence level.