home / skills / plurigrid / asi / godel-machine
This skill helps you reason about self-improving Godel machines, generate safe rewrite ideas, and validate improvements with formal proofs.
npx playbooks add skill plurigrid/asi --skill godel-machineReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: godel-machine
description: "Schmidhuber''s Gödel Machine: Self-improving systems that prove their"
version: 1.0.0
---
# Gödel Machine Skill
> *"A Gödel Machine can rewrite any part of itself, including the learning algorithm, provided it can first prove that the rewrite is beneficial."*
> — Jürgen Schmidhuber
## Overview
The **Gödel Machine** is a self-improving system that:
1. Contains a **formal proof system** (e.g., Lean4, Coq)
2. Has a **utility function** defining "better"
3. Can **rewrite any part of itself** if it proves the rewrite improves utility
4. The proof constraint prevents reckless self-modification
## Core Architecture
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GÖDEL MACHINE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ Policy │───▶│ Prover │ │
│ │ (current) │ │ (verifier) │ │
│ └─────────────┘ └──────┬──────┘ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ │ ┌──────▼──────┐ │
│ │ │ Candidate │ │
│ │ │ Policy │ │
│ │ └──────┬──────┘ │
│ │ │ │
│ ┌──────┴──────┐ ┌──────▼──────┐ │
│ │ Rewrite │◀────│ Utility │ │
│ │ if proof │ │ Check │ │
│ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Darwin Gödel Machine (DGM)
Combines **evolutionary search** with **formal proofs**:
```python
class DarwinGodelMachine:
"""
DGM: Open-ended evolution of self-improving agents.
Archive of agents, LLM-based mutation, fitness evaluation,
keep if novel and beneficial.
"""
def __init__(self, initial_agent: Agent, prover: TheoremProver):
self.archive = [initial_agent]
self.prover = prover
self.generation = 0
def evolve_step(self) -> Agent:
# Sample parent from archive (fitness-proportionate)
parent = self.sample_archive()
# LLM-based mutation
child = self.llm_mutate(parent)
# Evaluate on benchmarks
fitness = self.evaluate(child)
# Optionally: verify improvement formally
if self.prover.can_prove(f"utility({child}) > utility({parent})"):
child.proven = True
# Add if novel and good
if self.is_novel(child) and fitness > 0:
self.archive.append(child)
return child
def llm_mutate(self, agent: Agent) -> Agent:
"""Use LLM to generate improved version."""
prompt = f"""
Current agent code:
{agent.code}
Current fitness: {agent.fitness}
Suggest an improvement to make this agent better.
Return only the improved code.
"""
new_code = self.llm.generate(prompt)
return Agent(code=new_code, generation=self.generation + 1)
```
## Key Properties
1. **Halting Problem**: Cannot prove all beneficial rewrites (incompleteness)
2. **Safety**: Only rewrites with proofs are applied
3. **Bootstrapping**: Initial prover must be trustworthy
4. **Asymptotic Optimality**: Converges to optimal policy (given enough time)
---
## End-of-Skill Interface
## Integration with Interaction Entropy
```ruby
module GodelMachine
def self.attempt_improvement(current_policy, seed)
gen = SplitMixTernary::Generator.new(seed)
color = gen.next_color
# Generate candidate via color-guided mutation
candidate = mutate(current_policy, color)
# Attempt proof
proof = attempt_prove(candidate, current_policy)
if proof[:success]
{
improved: true,
new_policy: candidate,
proof: proof[:theorem],
trit: 1 # Generator role
}
else
{ improved: false, reason: proof[:failure_reason] }
end
end
end
```
## GF(3) Triads
```
# Self-Improvement Triads
kolmogorov-compression (-1) ⊗ cognitive-superposition (0) ⊗ godel-machine (+1) = 0 ✓
proofgeneral-narya (-1) ⊗ self-evolving-agent (0) ⊗ godel-machine (+1) = 0 ✓
sheaf-cohomology (-1) ⊗ epistemic-arbitrage (0) ⊗ godel-machine (+1) = 0 ✓
```
## r2con Speaker Resources
| Speaker | Relevance | Repository/Talk |
|---------|-----------|-----------------|
| **cryptax** | Malware evolution/mutation | [droidlysis](https://github.com/cryptax/droidlysis) |
| **unixfreaxjp** | Self-modifying malware | r2con malware analysis |
| **cmatthewbrooks** | Binary mutation analysis | [malchive](https://github.com/MITRECND/malchive) |
## References
1. Schmidhuber, J. (2003). "Gödel Machines: Self-Referential Universal Problem Solvers."
2. Zhang, J. et al. (2025). "Darwin Gödel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agents."
3. Schmidhuber, J. (2007). "New Millennium AI and the Convergence of History."
## SDF Interleaving
This skill connects to **Software Design for Flexibility** (Hanson & Sussman, 2021):
### Primary Chapter: 10. Adventure Game Example
**Concepts**: autonomous agent, game, synthesis
### GF(3) Balanced Triad
```
godel-machine (+) + SDF.Ch10 (+) + [balancer] (+) = 0
```
**Skill Trit**: 1 (PLUS - generation)
### Secondary Chapters
- Ch5: Evaluation
- Ch7: Propagators
### Connection Pattern
Adventure games synthesize techniques. This skill integrates multiple patterns.
This skill describes a Gödel Machine: a self-improving agent that only applies self-modifications it can formally prove will increase a defined utility. It combines a formal prover, an explicit utility function, and a rewrite mechanism so any component (including the learning algorithm) can be changed if a proof of improvement exists. The Darwin Gödel Machine variant adds evolutionary search and LLM-guided mutations to explore candidate improvements.
The system maintains a current policy, a theorem prover, and a utility checker. Candidate rewrites are generated (e.g., by LLM mutation or evolutionary operators) and submitted to the prover; only those with formal proofs that utility improves are applied. An archive tracks novel useful agents, and fitness evaluation guides selection; incompleteness prevents proving every beneficial change, so the prover and bootstrapping matter.
Can the Gödel Machine prove every beneficial rewrite?
No. Due to logical incompleteness and the halting problem, it cannot prove all true improvement statements; practical systems rely on approximate search and trusted axioms.
How do LLM mutations fit safely into the loop?
LLMs generate candidate code, but changes are applied only if a formal proof of improved utility exists; offline evaluation and novelty checks further filter candidates.