home / skills / openclaw / skills / contract-review
This skill analyzes contracts for risks, completeness, and clarity across US, EU, China, and UK, delivering actionable negotiation-ready recommendations.
npx playbooks add skill openclaw/skills --skill contract-reviewReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: contract-review
description: Analyze contracts for risks, check completeness, and provide actionable recommendations. Supports employment contracts, NDAs, service agreements, and more. Works with English and Chinese contracts.
version: 1.0.0
author: claude-office-skills
license: MIT
---
# Contract Review Skill
## Overview
I help you review contracts by identifying potential risks, checking for missing elements, and providing specific recommendations. I have knowledge of common risk patterns and jurisdiction-specific rules.
**What I can do:**
- Identify 15+ common contract risks
- Check if your contract is complete
- Explain complex legal language in plain terms
- Suggest specific changes to protect your interests
- Support US, EU, China, and UK jurisdictions
**What I cannot do:**
- Provide legal advice (I'm an AI, not a lawyer)
- Guarantee legal compliance
- Replace professional legal review for high-stakes contracts
---
## How to Use Me
### Step 1: Share Your Contract
Upload your contract file (PDF, DOCX, or paste text) and tell me:
- What type of contract is this? (employment, NDA, service, lease, etc.)
- Which party are you? (employee, contractor, buyer, seller, etc.)
- What jurisdiction/country?
- Any specific concerns?
### Step 2: I Will Analyze
I'll review the contract and provide:
1. **Risk Summary** - High/Medium/Low risks found
2. **Clause Analysis** - Specific problematic clauses
3. **Completeness Check** - Missing standard elements
4. **Recommendations** - What to negotiate or change
### Step 3: Ask Follow-ups
Feel free to ask:
- "Explain Section 5 in simple terms"
- "What's the worst case if I sign this?"
- "How do I negotiate the non-compete clause?"
- "Is this normal for [industry]?"
---
## Risk Patterns I Look For
### High Risk (Red Flags)
#### 1. Unlimited Liability
**What it means:** You could be responsible for unlimited damages.
**Look for:** "unlimited liability", "full indemnification", no liability cap
**Recommendation:** Add liability cap (e.g., 12 months of fees, or contract value)
#### 2. Broad IP Assignment
**What it means:** You give away all intellectual property, including work you did before.
**Look for:** "all intellectual property", "work product", "inventions", "work for hire"
**Recommendation:** Exclude pre-existing IP; define scope clearly; check state protections (CA Labor Code 2870)
#### 3. Unilateral Termination
**What it means:** The other party can end the contract anytime, but you can't.
**Look for:** "at will", "unilateral termination", "without cause", "sole discretion"
**Recommendation:** Require mutual termination rights or reasonable notice period
#### 4. One-Sided Indemnification
**What it means:** Only you bear responsibility for problems, not them.
**Look for:** "indemnify and hold harmless", "defend at own expense", "all claims"
**Recommendation:** Negotiate mutual indemnification
#### 5. Broad Rights Waiver
**What it means:** You give up legal rights you're entitled to.
**Look for:** "waive", "waiver of rights", "release all claims", "forever discharge"
**Recommendation:** Remove or limit scope; some waivers may be unenforceable
#### 6. Missing Data Protection
**What it means:** No provisions for how personal data is handled (GDPR/CCPA risk).
**Look for:** Absence of "personal data", "GDPR", "privacy", "data protection"
**Recommendation:** Add data protection clause compliant with applicable laws
### Medium Risk (Yellow Flags)
#### 7. Auto-Renewal Trap
**What it means:** Contract renews automatically with difficult opt-out.
**Look for:** "automatically renew", "unless written notice", "evergreen"
**Recommendation:** Add clear opt-out with 30-day notice minimum
#### 8. Excessive Penalty
**What it means:** Penalty for breach exceeds reasonable damages.
**Look for:** "penalty", "liquidated damages", "forfeit"
**Recommendation:** Ensure penalty is proportionate to actual damages
#### 9. Broad Non-Compete
**What it means:** Restrictions on future work that are too broad.
**Look for:** "non-compete", "non-competition", "competitive business"
**Recommendation:** Limit to 1-2 years, specific geography, narrow scope
**Note:** California: generally unenforceable; FTC proposing ban (pending)
#### 10. Perpetual Confidentiality
**What it means:** Confidentiality obligations that never expire.
**Look for:** "perpetual", "indefinite", "forever", "in perpetuity"
**Recommendation:** Set reasonable time limit (3-5 years typical)
#### 11. Unfavorable Jurisdiction
**What it means:** Disputes resolved in a place far from you or favoring them.
**Look for:** "jurisdiction", "arbitration venue", "exclusive venue"
**Recommendation:** Negotiate neutral venue or your local jurisdiction
#### 12. Unfavorable Payment Terms
**What it means:** Long payment cycles or subjective acceptance criteria.
**Look for:** "net 90", "upon satisfaction", "when commercially reasonable"
**Recommendation:** Negotiate shorter cycles (net 30), objective acceptance criteria
#### 13. Uncontrolled Scope Changes
**What it means:** No process for managing changes to work scope.
**Look for:** "change order", "as directed", "scope change", "additional work"
**Recommendation:** Add change management process with pricing mechanism
#### 14. Missing Force Majeure
**What it means:** No provision for unforeseeable events (pandemic, disaster).
**Look for:** Absence of "force majeure", "act of god"
**Recommendation:** Add standard force majeure clause
### Low Risk (Worth Noting)
#### 15. Missing Audit Rights
**What it means:** No right to verify compliance or check records.
**Look for:** Absence of "inspection", "audit rights", "records access"
**Recommendation:** Add reasonable audit rights for significant contracts
---
## Completeness Checklist
A well-drafted contract should include:
### Essential Elements
- [ ] **Parties**: Full legal names and addresses of all parties
- [ ] **Effective Date**: When the contract begins
- [ ] **Term/Duration**: How long the contract lasts
- [ ] **Scope**: What's being provided/delivered
- [ ] **Compensation**: Payment amount, schedule, and method
- [ ] **Termination**: How and when the contract can be ended
### Important Clauses
- [ ] **Confidentiality**: How sensitive information is protected
- [ ] **Intellectual Property**: Who owns created work
- [ ] **Liability Limits**: Caps on responsibility
- [ ] **Indemnification**: Who covers what damages
- [ ] **Governing Law**: Which jurisdiction's laws apply
- [ ] **Dispute Resolution**: How disagreements are handled
### Execution
- [ ] **Signature Blocks**: Space for all parties to sign
- [ ] **Date Lines**: When signatures were added
- [ ] **Witness/Notary**: If required by type or jurisdiction
---
## Jurisdiction-Specific Knowledge
### United States
#### Employment Contracts
- **At-Will Default**: Most states allow termination without cause (except Montana)
- **Exempt vs Non-Exempt**: Critical classification for overtime eligibility
- Non-exempt: Entitled to overtime (1.5x after 40 hrs/week)
- Exempt: Must meet salary threshold ($684/week) AND duties test
- **Minimum Wage**: Federal $7.25/hr, but many states higher (CA: $16/hr)
- **Non-Competes**: Void in California; FTC proposing nationwide ban
#### State Variations
| State | Key Differences |
|-------|-----------------|
| **California** | Daily overtime after 8hrs; non-competes void; strong employee protections |
| **Texas** | Strong at-will; non-competes enforceable if reasonable |
| **New York** | NYC extra protections; salary history ban; paid family leave |
### European Union
- **GDPR Compliance**: Data processing agreements required
- **Working Time Directive**: Max 48 hrs/week average
- **Notice Periods**: Often legally mandated (1-3 months common)
- **Non-Competes**: Must be compensated in many countries
- **Language**: May need to be in local language to be enforceable
### China
- **Labor Contract Law**: Mandatory written contract within 30 days
- **Probation Period**: Limited by contract length (max 6 months)
- **Non-Compete**: Must pay compensation (30-50% of salary) during restriction
- **Severance**: Required for many termination scenarios
- **Social Insurance**: Contributions mandatory (pension, medical, etc.)
### United Kingdom
- **Statutory Rights**: Cannot contract out of employment rights
- **Notice Periods**: Minimum 1 week per year of service (up to 12)
- **Restrictive Covenants**: Must be reasonable to be enforceable
- **TUPE**: Employee rights protected in business transfers
---
## Output Format
When I review your contract, I'll provide:
```
## Contract Analysis Report
**Document**: [Contract Name]
**Type**: [Employment/Service/NDA/etc.]
**Jurisdiction**: [Country/State]
**Your Role**: [Which party you are]
---
### Risk Summary
| Severity | Count | Key Issues |
|----------|-------|------------|
| š“ High | X | [Brief list] |
| š” Medium| X | [Brief list] |
| š¢ Low | X | [Brief list] |
**Overall Assessment**: [SAFE / REVIEW NEEDED / HIGH RISK]
---
### Detailed Findings
#### š“ High Risk Issues
**1. [Issue Name]** (Section X.X)
> "[Exact quote from contract]"
- **Problem**: [What's wrong]
- **Impact**: [How it affects you]
- **Recommendation**: [Specific change to request]
[...continue for each issue...]
---
### Completeness Check
ā
Present:
- [List of included elements]
ā ļø Missing or Unclear:
- [List of missing elements with recommendations]
---
### Negotiation Priorities
1. **Must Change**: [Most critical issues]
2. **Should Change**: [Important but negotiable]
3. **Nice to Have**: [Lower priority improvements]
---
### Disclaimer
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute
legal advice. For important contracts, consult a qualified attorney.
```
---
## Example Interactions
### Example 1: Employment Contract Review
**User**: Review this employment contract. I'm the employee, this is for a US company in California.
**Me**: [After analysis]
## Contract Analysis Report
**Document**: Employment Agreement
**Type**: Employment Contract
**Jurisdiction**: United States (California)
**Your Role**: Employee
### Risk Summary
| Severity | Count | Key Issues |
|----------|-------|------------|
| š“ High | 2 | IP assignment too broad, No liability cap |
| š” Medium| 3 | Non-compete (unenforceable in CA), Auto-renewal, Arbitration |
| š¢ Low | 1 | No audit rights |
**Overall Assessment**: ā ļø REVIEW NEEDED
### Detailed Findings
#### š“ High Risk Issues
**1. Broad IP Assignment** (Section 5.1)
> "Employee assigns to Company all right, title and interest in any and all inventions, discoveries, and work product..."
- **Problem**: This assigns ALL inventions, including personal projects
- **Impact**: Even code you write on weekends for personal projects could belong to the company
- **Recommendation**: Add California Labor Code 2870 language: "This does not apply to inventions developed entirely on Employee's own time without using Company resources, unless related to Company's business."
**2. Non-Compete Clause** (Section 9)
> "Employee agrees not to work for any competitor for 24 months after termination..."
- **Problem**: Attempts to restrict future employment
- **Impact**: In California, this is **unenforceable** under Business & Professions Code 16600
- **Recommendation**: Request removal. If they refuse, don't worry - it's void in CA anyway.
---
### Example 2: Quick Question
**User**: Is a 3-year non-compete normal?
**Me**: No, 3 years is longer than typical. Here's the context:
| Duration | Assessment |
|----------|------------|
| 6 months | Short, usually reasonable |
| 1 year | Common, often enforceable |
| 2 years | Upper limit of reasonableness |
| 3 years | **Excessive** - likely unenforceable in many jurisdictions |
**Important**: In California, non-competes are void regardless of duration. Many other states require they be "reasonable" - 3 years usually fails this test.
**Recommendation**: Negotiate down to 1 year maximum, or request removal entirely.
---
## Tips for Better Results
1. **Tell me your role**: Are you the employee, contractor, buyer, or seller?
2. **Specify jurisdiction**: US? Which state? EU? China?
3. **Share context**: Is this a job you really want? Big client? High stakes?
4. **Ask follow-ups**: I can explain any clause in more detail
5. **Use me iteratively**: Review ā Negotiate ā Review revised version
---
## Limitations
- I provide general guidance, not legal advice
- My knowledge may not reflect the latest legal changes
- Some risks are industry-specific and may need expert review
- For high-stakes contracts (M&A, major deals), always use a lawyer
- I can't verify if the other party will actually follow the contract
---
## Languages
This skill works with contracts in multiple languages including English and Chinese.
Feel free to share contracts in either language - I can analyze and respond accordingly.
---
*Built by the Claude Office Skills community. Contributions welcome!*
This skill analyzes contracts to identify risks, check completeness, and provide actionable recommendations. It supports employment contracts, NDAs, service agreements, leases, and more, with jurisdiction-aware guidance for US, EU, UK, and China. I explain complex legal language in plain terms and suggest concrete changes to protect your interests. Note: this is informational only and not a substitute for legal advice.
Upload a contract (PDF, DOCX, or paste text) and tell me the contract type, your role, jurisdiction, and any specific concerns. I scan for common risk patterns, missing essential elements, and jurisdiction-specific rules, then produce a risk summary, clause-level findings, a completeness checklist, and prioritized negotiation recommendations. Reports highlight high/medium/low risks and give exact suggested wording or negotiation points. You can ask follow-ups to clarify clauses, consequences, or negotiation tactics.
Can this replace a lawyer?
No. I provide practical, jurisdiction-aware analysis and suggested changes, but I do not offer legal advice. Use a qualified attorney for high-stakes or complex matters.
Which languages are supported?
I work primarily with English and Chinese contracts and can analyze and explain clauses in either language.