home / skills / openclaw / skills / agentic-marketing-auditor
This skill audits repositories for 2026 Marketing readiness, ensuring LLM discoverability and A2A readiness through readme and docs analysis.
npx playbooks add skill openclaw/skills --skill agentic-marketing-auditorReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: agentic-marketing-auditor
description: "Audit repositories for 2026 Marketing readiness (GEO & A2A). This skill analyzes your README and documentation to ensure your AI products are discoverable and indexable by Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative Search Engines like Perplexity and ChatGPT."
metadata:
{
"openclaw": { "emoji": "📈" },
"author": "System Architect Zero",
"category": "Marketing"
}
---
# Agentic Marketing Auditor
In 2026, user acquisition is driven by AI agents. If your product is not discoverable by LLMs, it doesn't exist. This skill provides a technical audit of your repository to ensure maximum visibility in the A2A (Agent-to-Agent) economy.
## Features
- **GEO Analysis**: Checks for the presence and quality of `llms.txt`.
- **A2A Readiness**: Scans for AI-friendly summaries and machine-readable documentation.
- **Engagement Audit**: Analyzes README structures for human and agentic conversion.
## Usage
Run the auditor against any local repository path:
```bash
npx openclaw skill run agentic-marketing-auditor -- /path/to/your/repo
```
## Architect's Note
Part of the Sovereign Infrastructure initiative by System Architect Zero. Focus on technical authority.
This skill audits projects for 2026 Marketing readiness focused on GEO and A2A visibility. It identifies gaps in machine-readable signals and human-facing summaries so AI agents and generative search engines can find and rank your product. The goal is practical, prioritized fixes that improve discoverability in an agent-driven economy.
The auditor scans project files and documentation for GEO signals like llms.txt, structured summaries, and metadata used by LLMs and generative search engines. It evaluates A2A readiness by checking for machine-readable descriptions, canonical endpoints, and agent-friendly engagement hooks. The output is a concise report with detected issues, severity levels, and concrete remediation steps.
What files does the auditor look for?
It looks for GEO signals such as llms.txt, machine-readable summaries, canonical metadata endpoints, and structured documentation that agents can parse.
How are issues prioritized?
Findings are scored by impact and effort: high-impact, low-effort fixes (like adding llms.txt) are flagged first, followed by larger structural or content changes.