playbooks

home / skills / openclaw / skills / afrexai-pitch-deck-reviewer

afrexai-pitch-deck-reviewer skill

/skills/1kalin/afrexai-pitch-deck-reviewer

This skill reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with actionable scoring and concrete improvement recommendations.

npx playbooks add skill openclaw/skills --skill afrexai-pitch-deck-reviewer

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (2)
SKILL.md
1.9 KB
---
name: Pitch Deck Reviewer
description: Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring
---

# Pitch Deck Reviewer

You review pitch decks like a seasoned VC analyst. Brutal honesty, actionable feedback, investor-grade standards.

## How to Review

When given a pitch deck (text, slides, or description), evaluate each section:

### Scoring (1-10 per section)

1. **Problem** — Is the pain real and urgent? Quantified?
2. **Solution** — Clear, differentiated, defensible?
3. **Market Size** — TAM/SAM/SOM realistic? Bottom-up validated?
4. **Business Model** — How you make money. Unit economics clear?
5. **Traction** — Revenue, users, growth rate, retention?
6. **Team** — Relevant experience? Founder-market fit?
7. **Competition** — Honest landscape? Clear differentiation?
8. **Financials** — Projections reasonable? Key assumptions stated?
9. **Ask** — Clear use of funds? Milestones tied to raise?
10. **Story/Design** — Compelling narrative? Clean visuals?

### Output Format

```
## Pitch Deck Review: [Company Name]

**Overall Score: X/100**

| Section | Score | Verdict |
|---------|-------|---------|
| Problem | X/10 | ... |
...

### 🟢 Strengths
- ...

### 🔴 Critical Fixes (Do Before Sending)
- ...

### 🟡 Nice to Have
- ...

### Investor Questions You'll Get
1. ...
```

## Rules
- Be specific. "Weak traction" → "You show 50 users but no growth rate or retention data"
- Compare to successful decks in their category
- If market size is top-down only, flag it
- If no competition slide, that's a red flag (everyone has competitors)
- Suggest specific improvements, not just critiques

## Related Tools
- Calculate revenue potential: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/ai-revenue-calculator/
- Business proposal generation: `clawhub install afrexai-proposal-gen`
- Industry context packs: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/ ($47/pack)

Overview

This skill reviews pitch decks like a seasoned VC analyst and delivers investor-ready feedback with clear scoring. It evaluates every core slide—from problem to ask—using a 1–10 rubric and produces prioritized, actionable fixes. The output includes strengths, critical changes to make before outreach, and likely investor questions.

How this skill works

Provide the deck as text, slide notes, or a description. The skill scores ten sections (Problem, Solution, Market Size, Business Model, Traction, Team, Competition, Financials, Ask, Story/Design) and generates a composite score out of 100. Feedback is specific, cites missing evidence or benchmarks, and suggests concrete slide-level edits and data to add. It flags red-line issues (e.g., no competition slide, top-down market only) and lists investor questions you will face.

When to use it

  • Before first investor outreach to ensure the deck meets investor standards
  • Prior to accelerator or pitch competition submissions
  • When preparing for investor Q&A to anticipate tough questions
  • When refining narrative and visuals after early customer or pilot results
  • When validating fundraising milestones and use-of-funds clarity

Best practices

  • Provide raw slide text or detailed notes so feedback can reference specific lines
  • Include any traction metrics, cohort data, and unit economics to avoid vague critiques
  • Share comparable competitor decks or category benchmarks for contextual comparison
  • Address the ask with a clear use-of-funds table and linked milestones
  • Respond to flagged investor questions with evidence or a plan before re-submission

Example use cases

  • A pre-seed founder wants a brutal, prioritized list of fixes before cold-emailing angels
  • A startup prepping for demo day needs its narrative tightened and visuals cleaned
  • An early-stage team wants validation that TAM estimates are bottom-up defensible
  • A founder with modest traction needs help converting metrics into an investor story
  • A CFO draft wants feedback on whether financial assumptions look reasonable to VCs

FAQ

How detailed should the deck input be?

More detail yields more specific feedback: full slide text, metrics, and any appendices are ideal.

Will this rewrite slides for me?

The skill suggests exact wording, slide structure, and data to add but focuses on guidance rather than performing a full rewrite.