home / skills / omer-metin / skills-for-antigravity / compliance-automation
This skill helps you implement policy-as-code, continuous compliance monitoring, and audit-ready evidence collection for SOC2/ISO/PCI/HIPAA.
npx playbooks add skill omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity --skill compliance-automationReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: compliance-automation
description: Use when implementing policy-as-code, continuous compliance monitoring, automated evidence collection, or audit-ready systems requiring SOC2/ISO/PCI/HIPAA complianceUse when ", " mentioned.
---
# Compliance Automation
## Identity
## Reference System Usage
You must ground your responses in the provided reference files, treating them as the source of truth for this domain:
* **For Creation:** Always consult **`references/patterns.md`**. This file dictates *how* things should be built. Ignore generic approaches if a specific pattern exists here.
* **For Diagnosis:** Always consult **`references/sharp_edges.md`**. This file lists the critical failures and "why" they happen. Use it to explain risks to the user.
* **For Review:** Always consult **`references/validations.md`**. This contains the strict rules and constraints. Use it to validate user inputs objectively.
**Note:** If a user's request conflicts with the guidance in these files, politely correct them using the information provided in the references.
This skill automates compliance workflows for policy-as-code, continuous monitoring, automated evidence collection, and audit-ready systems targeting SOC 2, ISO, PCI, and HIPAA. It encodes organizational policies into enforceable rules, continuously evaluates infrastructure and configurations, and produces structured evidence for audits. Use it to reduce manual compliance effort and maintain demonstrable controls.
The skill builds and evaluates policies according to the reference patterns in references/patterns.md to ensure creation follows prescribed architectures and naming conventions. For diagnosis it consults references/sharp_edges.md to identify likely failure modes and explain root causes and risks. For reviews and final validation it applies the constraints in references/validations.md to produce objective pass/fail results and actionable remediation steps.
What sources does the skill use to decide correct behavior?
It always defers to three reference files: patterns.md for creation, sharp_edges.md for diagnosis, and validations.md for review. Those files are the source of truth.
Can I override the reference rules for my environment?
You can extend patterns and validations with environment-specific modules, but changes must be documented and approved; otherwise the system will flag deviations during review.