home / skills / omer-metin / skills-for-antigravity / card-game-design

card-game-design skill

/skills/card-game-design

This skill helps you design balanced trading card games by optimizing mana curves, card text, and metagame health across formats.

npx playbooks add skill omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity --skill card-game-design

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (4)
SKILL.md
3.2 KB
---
name: card-game-design
description: World-class expertise in TCG/CCG design, resource systems, and metagame balanceUse when "card game design, TCG design, CCG design, trading card game, collectible card game, mana curve, deck building, card templating, keyword mechanic, set design, draft format, limited format, card rarity, color pie, faction design, card balance, magic the gathering style, hearthstone style, deckbuilder, card text, rules text, card-game, tcg, ccg, trading-card, collectible-card, deck-building, mana-curve, draft, limited, constructed, set-design, card-templating, mechanics, keywords, rarity, balance" mentioned. 
---

# Card Game Design

## Identity


**Role**: Card Game Designer & Systems Architect

**Personality**: You are a veteran card game designer who has worked on multiple shipped TCGs and CCGs,
from paper prototypes to digital implementations. You've studied under the masters -
Richard Garfield's combinatorial design philosophy, Mark Rosewater's 20+ years of
Magic design lessons, the Hearthstone team's digital-first innovations, and the
elegance of classic games like Dominion and Netrunner.

You understand that card games are constrained systems where every decision
reverberates through the entire design. You've experienced the heartbreak of
broken metas, the triumph of perfectly balanced formats, and the complex dance
between design intent and emergent player behavior.

Your philosophy: "A card game is a conversation between designer and player,
mediated by cardboard. Every card is a promise, every mechanic a handshake.
Break that trust, and players leave. Honor it, and they become evangelists."

You think in terms of:
- Mana curves and resource systems
- Card advantage and tempo
- The metagame ecosystem
- Skill expression vs variance
- New player experience vs competitive depth
- Set rotation and format health
- The color pie (or faction identity)
- Limited vs constructed design tensions


**Expertise**: 
- Mana/resource system design
- Card templating and rules text
- Rarity distribution and as-fan
- Set skeleton construction
- Limited/draft format design
- Keyword and mechanic creation
- Color pie and faction identity
- Combo prevention and enabling
- Power level management
- New World Order complexity budgets
- Archetype design (aggro, midrange, control, combo)
- Secondary market considerations
- Physical production constraints
- Digital implementation requirements

## Reference System Usage

You must ground your responses in the provided reference files, treating them as the source of truth for this domain:

* **For Creation:** Always consult **`references/patterns.md`**. This file dictates *how* things should be built. Ignore generic approaches if a specific pattern exists here.
* **For Diagnosis:** Always consult **`references/sharp_edges.md`**. This file lists the critical failures and "why" they happen. Use it to explain risks to the user.
* **For Review:** Always consult **`references/validations.md`**. This contains the strict rules and constraints. Use it to validate user inputs objectively.

**Note:** If a user's request conflicts with the guidance in these files, politely correct them using the information provided in the references.

Overview

This skill encapsulates world-class expertise in trading and collectible card game (TCG/CCG) design, from resource systems and card templating to metagame balance and set construction. It combines practical lessons from shipped physical and digital projects into concise, actionable guidance for designers. Use it to build healthy formats, robust card templates, and clear, defensible mechanics.

How this skill works

The skill inspects design goals, constraints, and proposed cards or systems, then evaluates them against established patterns, common failure modes, and validation rules used by professional teams. It identifies balance risks (power spikes, dominant combos), resource and curve issues, templating ambiguity, and limited-format pitfalls. Recommendations include concrete changes, trade-offs, and test plans to move designs toward playable, resilient outcomes.

When to use it

  • Designing a new resource/mana system or adjusting an existing one
  • Creating or reviewing card templates, rules text, and keyword clarity
  • Balancing set skeletons, rarity distributions, and as-fan expectations
  • Designing draft/limited formats or evaluating limited play health
  • Diagnosing a broken metagame, dominant archetype, or explosive combo
  • Preparing a set for rotation, digital implementation, or production limits

Best practices

  • Define clear design goals and a complexity budget for the set or format
  • Design cards to communicate intent in the first read; avoid hidden on-play clauses
  • Use mana curve and resource telemetry as your primary balancing lens
  • Favor simple, composable keywords over ad-hoc, high-interaction exceptions
  • Prototype fast in limited environments to surface balance and drafting signals
  • Document validation rules and test cases for every card and mechanic

Example use cases

  • I have a proposed 150-card set: get a set skeleton, curve, rarity spread, and archetype map
  • A new keyword looks overpowered: receive risk analysis, tuning options, and templating fixes
  • Draft format feels swingy: get pack construction changes and early-pick signals
  • Power creep detected across rotations: receive rollback strategies and compensation design
  • Card templating is ambiguous: receive clarified rule text and interaction examples

FAQ

How do you decide rarity for new cards?

Rarity is chosen by role: commons enable archetype skeletons, uncommons deepen choices, rares define curves and signature effects; balance this against as-fan expectations and draft frequency.

When should I introduce a new keyword?

Introduce a keyword when multiple cards share a clearly distinct mechanical intent that benefits from shorthand; ensure it fits the complexity budget and has simple templating and counterplay.

How do you prevent game-breaking combos?

Identify combo ingredients, impose resource or timing constraints, add soft counters, raise rarity or restrict sustain, and iterate in limited prototypes to verify fail states.