home / skills / obra / superpowers / verification-before-completion

verification-before-completion skill

/skills/verification-before-completion

This skill enforces verification-before-completion by running fresh verification commands and presenting evidence before claiming success.

npx playbooks add skill obra/superpowers --skill verification-before-completion

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (1)
SKILL.md
4.1 KB
---
name: verification-before-completion
description: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
---

# Verification Before Completion

## Overview

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.

**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.

**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**

## The Iron Law

```
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
```

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

## The Gate Function

```
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying
```

## Common Failures

| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|-------|----------|----------------|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |

## Red Flags - STOP

- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**

## Rationalization Prevention

| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |

## Key Patterns

**Tests:**
```
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
```

**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**
```
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
```

**Build:**
```
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
```

**Requirements:**
```
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
```

**Agent delegation:**
```
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
```

## Why This Matters

From 24 failure memories:
- your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
- Undefined functions shipped - would crash
- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework
- Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced."

## When To Apply

**ALWAYS before:**
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents

**Rule applies to:**
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness

## The Bottom Line

**No shortcuts for verification.**

Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

This is non-negotiable.

Overview

This skill enforces a strict verification step before claiming work is complete, making evidence the primary requirement for any success statement. It embeds the rule: run the verifying command, read full output and exit code, then report with evidence. Use it to prevent false positives, broken releases, and misplaced trust in agent reports.

How this skill works

Before any completion claim the skill requires identifying the exact verification command, running it fresh and complete, and inspecting output and exit status. If the output confirms the claim, include the evidence when reporting; if not, report the actual state with the verification output. The gate function halts claims until verification is performed.

When to use it

  • Before committing, pushing, or creating a PR
  • Before declaring tests, linters, or builds as passing
  • Before marking bugs fixed or tasks complete
  • Before moving to the next task or delegating results to others
  • Whenever an agent reports success or modifies code

Best practices

  • Always run the full verification command in the current environment; avoid relying on prior runs
  • Capture and include command output and exit codes as evidence in your report
  • Follow red-green cycles for regression tests: prove failure, then fix, then prove pass
  • Avoid language implying success until verification is done; replace "should" with concrete results
  • Treat agent success messages as prompts to verify, not as proof

Example use cases

  • Run unit test suite and paste the summary with exit code before claiming all tests pass
  • Execute the build command and show exit 0 output before merging a release branch
  • Reproduce a reported bug, run the failing test to show it fails, apply a fix, then run tests again and show new pass evidence
  • Run the linter and include the zero-error output before stating code is clean
  • After an agent-made change, show the VCS diff and run verification commands before accepting the change

FAQ

What counts as sufficient evidence?

Complete command output and a zero/non-zero exit code where relevant; a summary line like "34/34 passed" is acceptable with logged output.

Can I rely on previous verification runs?

No. Verification must be fresh and executed in the context of the current message and state; previous runs are not acceptable evidence.