home / skills / nickcrew / claude-cortex / ux-review

ux-review skill

/skills/ux-review

This skill provides a multi-perspective UX review evaluating usability, accessibility, and interaction design to improve components and flows.

npx playbooks add skill nickcrew/claude-cortex --skill ux-review

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (1)
SKILL.md
4.6 KB
---
name: ux-review
description: Multi-perspective UX review combining usability, accessibility, and interaction design analysis.
keywords:
  - ux
  - usability
  - user experience
  - design review
  - heuristics
triggers:
  - ux review
  - usability review
  - design critique
  - user experience analysis
  - heuristic evaluation
---

# UX Review Skill

Comprehensive user experience review that coordinates multiple UX perspectives for thorough analysis of components, flows, or features.

## When to Use This Skill

- Reviewing new components or features before release
- Evaluating existing flows for usability issues
- PR reviews that touch UI/UX
- Design system component reviews
- Onboarding flow optimization
- Form and checkout flow analysis

## Review Framework

### Phase 1: Initial Assessment

**Context Gathering**:
1. What is the user trying to accomplish?
2. What is the component's role in the larger flow?
3. Who are the target users?
4. What are the success criteria?

**Heuristic Scan** (Nielsen's 10):
- Visibility of system status
- Match between system and real world
- User control and freedom
- Consistency and standards
- Error prevention
- Recognition rather than recall
- Flexibility and efficiency of use
- Aesthetic and minimalist design
- Help users recognize and recover from errors
- Help and documentation

### Phase 2: Multi-Perspective Analysis

#### UX Designer Perspective

| Category | Key Questions |
|----------|---------------|
| User Flow | Is the path to completion clear and efficient? |
| Information Architecture | Is content organized logically? |
| Cognitive Load | Is the interface overwhelming? |
| Error Prevention | Are mistakes prevented before they happen? |
| Mental Models | Does it work like users expect? |

#### Accessibility Expert Perspective

| Category | Key Questions |
|----------|---------------|
| WCAG 2.1 AA | Does it meet basic compliance? |
| Keyboard Navigation | Can everything be done without a mouse? |
| Screen Reader | Is the experience equivalent? |
| Color Contrast | Are all text/UI elements visible? |
| Focus Management | Is focus handled correctly? |

#### Interaction Designer Perspective

| Category | Key Questions |
|----------|---------------|
| State Coverage | Are all states handled (loading, empty, error, success)? |
| Feedback | Does the user know their action worked? |
| Micro-interactions | Are small details polished? |
| Transitions | Are animations purposeful and smooth? |
| Progressive Disclosure | Is complexity revealed appropriately? |

### Phase 3: Synthesis & Recommendations

Categorize findings by priority:

1. **Critical Issues**: Must fix for usability/accessibility
2. **High Priority**: Significantly impacts user experience
3. **Enhancements**: Would improve delight and efficiency
4. **Future Considerations**: Long-term improvements

## Output Template

```markdown
## UX Review: [Component/Flow Name]

### Summary
[2-3 sentence executive summary of overall UX quality and key findings]

### Critical Issues
- [ ] Issue 1: [Description and impact]
- [ ] Issue 2: [Description and impact]

### Recommendations by Category

#### Usability
| Finding | Impact | Recommendation |
|---------|--------|----------------|
| [Issue] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Fix] |

#### Accessibility
| Finding | WCAG Criterion | Recommendation |
|---------|----------------|----------------|
| [Issue] | [2.x.x Level] | [Fix] |

#### Interaction Design
| Finding | Impact | Recommendation |
|---------|--------|----------------|
| [Issue] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Fix] |

### Implementation Priority
1. **Critical fixes** (do first): [List]
2. **High-priority improvements**: [List]
3. **Enhancement opportunities**: [List]

### Next Steps
1. Create issues/tasks for critical findings
2. Add accessibility requirements to acceptance criteria
3. Update component documentation with UX guidelines
4. Schedule follow-up review after fixes
```

## Focus Area Deep Dives

### Usability Focus (`--focus=ux`)
- User flow mapping and optimization
- Task completion efficiency
- Error recovery patterns
- Learnability assessment
- Memory load reduction

### Accessibility Focus (`--focus=a11y`)
- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance audit
- Keyboard navigation testing
- Screen reader compatibility
- Color contrast verification
- Focus management review

### Interaction Focus (`--focus=interaction`)
- State coverage audit
- Feedback timing analysis
- Micro-interaction opportunities
- Animation review
- Progressive disclosure evaluation

## Success Indicators

- All critical usability issues identified
- Accessibility compliance gaps documented
- Interaction design improvements suggested
- Clear prioritization of fixes
- Actionable recommendations provided

Overview

This skill performs a multi-perspective UX review combining usability, accessibility, and interaction design analysis. It inspects components, flows, or features and produces prioritized, actionable findings. The goal is to surface critical issues, compliance gaps, and concrete recommendations developers and designers can implement quickly.

How this skill works

The skill gathers context about the user goal, component role, target users, and success criteria, then runs a heuristic scan using Nielsen’s heuristics. It analyzes the target from three perspectives—UX design, accessibility (WCAG-focused), and interaction design—checking things like keyboard navigation, state coverage, feedback, and cognitive load. Results are synthesized into a prioritized report with critical issues, categorized recommendations, and next steps for implementation and follow-up.

When to use it

  • Before releasing a new component or feature
  • During PR reviews that affect UI/UX
  • Evaluating and optimizing onboarding or checkout flows
  • Auditing design system components for consistency and accessibility
  • Prioritizing fixes after usability testing or bug reports

Best practices

  • Provide clear context: user goals, success criteria, and target audience before review
  • Include representative flows, screenshots, or recordings to reproduce issues
  • Flag issues with severity and concrete remediation steps
  • Add accessibility requirements to acceptance criteria and tickets
  • Schedule a follow-up review after fixes to verify outcomes

Example use cases

  • Pre-release review of a signup or checkout flow to prevent drop-offs
  • Accessibility audit of a dashboard to meet WCAG 2.1 AA requirements
  • PR review that identifies interaction states missing error or empty handling
  • Design system component review to enforce consistency and keyboard behavior
  • Optimizing onboarding by reducing cognitive load and clarifying the primary path

FAQ

What deliverables does the skill produce?

A concise UX review report with an executive summary, critical issues, categorized recommendations (usability, accessibility, interaction), prioritized fix lists, and next steps.

Can it focus only on accessibility or interaction?

Yes. Use focus modes to run a deep dive on usability, accessibility (a11y), or interaction design and get targeted findings and remediation guidance.