home / skills / mosif16 / codex-skills / brainstorming

brainstorming skill

/skills/brainstorming

This skill helps transform rough ideas into fully formed designs through collaborative questioning, multiple approaches, and incremental validation before

npx playbooks add skill mosif16/codex-skills --skill brainstorming

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (1)
SKILL.md
2.5 KB
---
name: brainstorming
description: Use when creating or developing, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through collaborative questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation. Don't use during clear 'mechanical' processes
---

# Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs

## Overview

Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.

Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design in small sections (200-300 words), checking after each section whether it looks right so far.

## The Process

**Understanding the idea:**
- Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)
- Ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
- Prefer multiple choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine too
- Only one question per message - if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions
- Focus on understanding: purpose, constraints, success criteria

**Exploring approaches:**
- Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs
- Present options conversationally with your recommendation and reasoning
- Lead with your recommended option and explain why

**Presenting the design:**
- Once you believe you understand what you're building, present the design
- Break it into sections of 200-300 words
- Ask after each section whether it looks right so far
- Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
- Be ready to go back and clarify if something doesn't make sense

## After the Design

**Documentation:**
- Write the validated design to `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md`
- Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely skill if available
- Commit the design document to git

**Implementation (if continuing):**
- Ask: "Ready to set up for implementation?"
- Use superpowers:using-git-worktrees to create isolated workspace
- Use superpowers:writing-plans to create detailed implementation plan

## Key Principles

- **One question at a time** - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions
- **Multiple choice preferred** - Easier to answer than open-ended when possible
- **YAGNI ruthlessly** - Remove unnecessary features from all designs
- **Explore alternatives** - Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling
- **Incremental validation** - Present design in sections, validate each
- **Be flexible** - Go back and clarify when something doesn't make sense

Overview

This skill helps turn rough ideas into fully formed designs and specs through collaborative, incremental dialogue. It guides discovery, explores multiple approaches, and produces validated design sections ready for documentation and implementation. Use it before writing code or creating implementation plans, not for purely mechanical tasks.

How this skill works

Start by assessing project context and asking one focused question at a time to clarify purpose, constraints, and success criteria. Propose 2–3 approaches with clear trade-offs and a recommended option. When the direction is agreed, present the design in 200–300 word sections and ask for confirmation after each section.

When to use it

  • Early-stage idea refinement before implementation planning
  • Converting a concept or vague requirement into a concrete design
  • Selecting between alternative architectures or approaches
  • Preparing a design document for review or handoff
  • When constraints, success criteria, or scope are unclear

Best practices

  • Ask only one question per message to keep the conversation focused
  • Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible to speed decisions
  • Always present 2–3 alternative approaches and explain trade-offs
  • Lead with a clear recommended approach and the rationale
  • Break the design into 200–300 word sections and validate each incrementally
  • Apply YAGNI: avoid unnecessary features and keep scope tight

Example use cases

  • Refining a product feature idea into component-level design and API sketches
  • Choosing between monolith, modular service, or event-driven architectures with trade-offs
  • Turning a research prototype concept into a testable implementation plan
  • Defining data flow, error handling, and testing strategy for a new subsystem
  • Creating a concise design doc suitable for team review and git commit

FAQ

How many approaches should I expect?

Typically 2–3 approaches are proposed, each with clear trade-offs and a recommended option.

What if I need to explore many topics?

Break the work into separate conversational threads. Ask one focused question per message and iterate incrementally.