home / skills / martinffx / claude-code-atelier / testing
/plugins/atelier-spec/skills/testing
This skill helps you design and execute stub-driven tests across layers, ensuring clear boundaries and rapid feedback from core to edge.
npx playbooks add skill martinffx/claude-code-atelier --skill testingReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: testing
description: Stub-Driven TDD and layer boundary testing. Use when writing tests, deciding what to test, or testing at component boundaries.
user-invocable: false
---
# Testing Skill
Stub-Driven Test-Driven Development and layer boundary testing for functional core and effectful edge architecture.
## Core Principle: Stub-Driven TDD
Test-Driven Development workflow for the functional core / effectful edge pattern:
```
1. Stub → Create minimal interface/function signatures
2. Test → Write tests against stubs
3. Implement → Make tests pass with real implementation
4. Refactor → Improve code while keeping tests green
```
**Key insight:** Write interface signatures first, test against those, then implement—not the other way around.
See [references/stub-driven-tdd.md] for complete workflow examples.
## Layer Boundary Testing
Test at the boundaries between functional core and effectful edge, not internal implementation.
```
Test here ──────▼──────────────────▼────── Test here
Effectful Edge │ Functional Core
(stub) │ (unit test)
```
### Where to Test Each Layer
| Layer | Test Type | What to Stub | What to Assert |
|-------|-----------|--------------|-----------------|
| **Entity** | Unit | Nothing (pure) | Validation, rules, transforms |
| **Service** | Unit | Repositories | Orchestration logic, error handling |
| **Router** | Integration | Service | Status codes, response format |
| **Repository** | Integration | DB connection | CRUD operations, queries |
| **Consumer** | Integration | Service | Event parsing, service calls |
See [references/boundaries.md] for detailed testing patterns by layer.
## Functional Core Testing
### Entity Tests (Pure Functions)
Focus: Validation, business rules, data transformations
```typescript
describe('Order entity', () => {
describe('validation', () => {
it('rejects empty items', () => {
const order = new Order('1', 'C1', [], 'pending', 0);
expect(order.validate().ok).toBe(false);
});
});
describe('business rules', () => {
it('prevents cancelling shipped order', () => {
const order = new Order('1', 'C1', [], 'shipped', 0);
expect(order.canCancel()).toBe(false);
});
});
describe('transformations', () => {
it('converts request to entity with calculated total', () => {
const order = Order.fromRequest({
customerId: 'C1',
items: [
{ productId: 'P1', quantity: 2, price: 10 },
{ productId: 'P2', quantity: 1, price: 15 }
]
});
expect(order.total).toBe(35);
});
});
});
```
### Service Tests (Stubbed Dependencies)
Focus: Orchestration logic with stubbed repositories
```typescript
describe('OrderService.createOrder', () => {
let service: OrderService;
let mockRepo: OrderRepository;
beforeEach(() => {
mockRepo = {
save: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ id: '123' }),
findById: vi.fn()
};
service = new OrderService(mockRepo);
});
it('creates order with valid data', async () => {
const result = await service.createOrder({
customerId: 'C1',
items: [{ productId: 'P1', quantity: 2 }]
});
expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
expect(mockRepo.save).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it('does not save when validation fails', async () => {
const result = await service.createOrder({
customerId: 'C1',
items: [] // Invalid
});
expect(result.ok).toBe(false);
expect(mockRepo.save).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
```
See [references/core-testing.md] for comprehensive Entity and Service examples.
## Effectful Edge Testing
### Router, Repository, Consumer Integration Tests
Focus: Real HTTP/database/events with stubbed core
```typescript
// Router: real HTTP, stub service
describe('POST /orders', () => {
it('returns 201 for valid request', async () => {
const mockService = {
createOrder: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(Ok({ id: '123' }))
};
const app = createApp(mockService);
const response = await request(app)
.post('/orders')
.send({ customerId: 'C1', items: [{ productId: 'P1', quantity: 2 }] });
expect(response.status).toBe(201);
});
});
// Repository: real test database
describe('OrderRepository.save', () => {
it('persists order to database', async () => {
const repo = new OrderRepository(testDb);
const saved = await repo.save({
id: '123',
customer_id: 'C1',
items: '[]',
status: 'pending',
total: 0
});
const found = await testDb.orders.findOne({ id: '123' });
expect(found).toBeDefined();
});
});
// Consumer: real events, stub service
describe('OrderConsumer', () => {
it('handles OrderPlaced event', async () => {
const mockService = {
processOrder: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(Ok({}))
};
const consumer = new OrderConsumer(mockService);
await consumer.handle({
type: 'OrderPlaced',
data: { orderId: '123' }
});
expect(mockService.processOrder).toHaveBeenCalledWith('123');
});
});
```
See [references/edge-testing.md] for Router, Repository, Consumer, Producer, and Client patterns.
## Test Coverage Guidelines
Aim for strategic coverage, not 100%:
**High Coverage (Critical):**
- Entity validation and business rules
- Service orchestration logic
- Critical user journeys (integration tests)
- Data transformations with logic
**Medium Coverage (Important):**
- Error handling paths
- Edge cases in business logic
- API contract validation
**Low Coverage (Optional):**
- Simple getters/setters
- Framework boilerplate
- Trivial mappings
- Internal utilities
## What NOT to Test
Avoid testing implementation details, framework behavior, and trivial code:
- Don't test private methods (test through public API)
- Don't test simple getters/setters (no logic = no test value)
- Don't test framework behavior (Express, database driver already tested)
- Don't test third-party library behavior (lodash, validation libraries)
- Don't test trivial mappings without logic
See [references/anti-patterns.md] for anti-patterns with examples and fixes.
## Testing → Implementation Flow
Follow this dependency order:
```
1. Entity tests (pure functions, fast)
2. Service tests (stubbed dependencies, fast)
3. Integration tests (real IO, slower)
```
This enables TDD: write tests first at lower layers, then implement, then build upward.
## Quick Reference
**For Entity Testing:** See [references/core-testing.md]
**For Service Testing:** See [references/core-testing.md]
**For Router/Repo/Consumer:** See [references/edge-testing.md]
**For Workflow Examples:** See [references/stub-driven-tdd.md]
**For What NOT to Do:** See [references/anti-patterns.md]
This skill teaches stub-driven TDD and layer-boundary testing for a functional core / effectful edge architecture. It focuses on writing minimal interfaces first, testing against stubs, and testing at boundaries between pure business logic and effectful systems. The approach helps keep unit tests fast and integration tests focused on contracts and IO.
Start by creating minimal stubs or interface signatures, write tests against those stubs, implement the real behavior, then refactor while keeping tests green. Test pure entities with unit tests and no stubbing, test services with stubbed repositories or dependencies, and run integration tests for routers, repositories, and consumers using real IO while stubbing the core. Coverage targets are strategic: high for critical logic, medium for error paths, and low for trivial code.
Why stub before implementing?
Stubbing interfaces first lets you define clear contracts, drive design with tests, and keep feedback fast while building up the implementation.
What layers should be unit tested vs integrated?
Unit-test pure entities and service orchestration with stubbed dependencies. Integration-test routers, repositories, and consumers with real IO but a stubbed core.