home / skills / makfly / superpowers-symfony / config-env-parameters
This skill helps refine Symfony config env parameters workflows with controlled checkpoints and auditable decisions to minimize risk.
npx playbooks add skill makfly/superpowers-symfony --skill config-env-parametersReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: symfony:config-env-parameters
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Edit
- Bash
- Glob
- Grep
description: Apply production-grade Symfony architecture and execution workflows with controlled scope and clear checkpoints. Use for config env parameters tasks.
---
# Config Env Parameters (Symfony)
## Use when
- Refining architecture/workflows/context handling in Symfony projects.
- Planning and executing medium/complex changes safely.
## Default workflow
1. Establish current boundaries, constraints, and coupling points.
2. Propose smallest coherent architectural adjustment.
2. Execute in checkpoints with validation at each stage.
2. Summarize tradeoffs and follow-up backlog.
## Guardrails
- Use existing project patterns by default.
- Avoid broad refactors without explicit need.
- Keep decision log clear and auditable.
## Progressive disclosure
- Use this file for execution posture and risk controls.
- Open references when deep implementation details are needed.
## Output contract
- Architecture/workflow changes.
- Checkpoint validation outcomes.
- Residual risks and next steps.
## References
- `reference.md`
- `docs/complexity-tiers.md`
This skill applies production-grade Symfony architecture and execution workflows focused on configuration environment parameters. It guides small, controlled architecture adjustments and staged execution with clear checkpoints and validation. The goal is safe, auditable changes that minimize risk and preserve existing project patterns.
The skill inspects current boundaries, coupling points, and environment parameter usage across Symfony services and configuration files. It proposes the smallest coherent change set, sequences work into checkpoints, and validates each stage against functional and deployment expectations. After execution it summarizes tradeoffs, residual risks, and recommended follow-up tasks.
How large should a checkpoint be?
Keep checkpoints minimal and testable: one logical change that can be validated with tests and a quick deployment smoke test.
What validation should be included for each checkpoint?
Include unit and integration tests, configuration linting, CI pipeline checks, and a short deployment smoke test in an isolated environment.