home / skills / lofcz / llmtornado / deep-researcher

This skill performs comprehensive multi-source research with structured analysis and synthesis to deliver a clear, evidence-based report.

npx playbooks add skill lofcz/llmtornado --skill deep-researcher

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (2)
SKILL.md
7.2 KB
---
name: deep-researcher
description: Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources.
---

## Deep Research Workflow

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

```
Deep Research Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define research scope and objectives
- [ ] Step 2: Conduct initial exploratory research
- [ ] Step 3: Deep dive into key areas
- [ ] Step 4: Cross-reference and validate findings
- [ ] Step 5: Synthesize and analyze information
- [ ] Step 6: Generate structured research report
```

## **Step 1: Define research scope and objectives**

Clearly establish the research parameters:
- **Main research question**: What is the primary question or topic to investigate?
- **Scope boundaries**: What aspects should be included or excluded?
- **Depth requirements**: How detailed should the research be?
- **Expected deliverables**: What format and structure for the final output?
- **Key areas of focus**: What specific subtopics or angles to explore?

Document these parameters before proceeding to ensure focused and efficient research.

## **Step 2: Conduct initial exploratory research**

Begin with broad reconnaissance to map the landscape:
- **Search for overview information**: Use search tools to find general information, definitions, and context
- **Identify key sources**: Look for authoritative sources, recent publications, and expert opinions
- **Note initial findings**: Create a preliminary list of important concepts, terms, and themes
- **Discover related topics**: Identify adjacent areas that may be relevant
- **Assess information gaps**: Note what information is readily available vs. what needs deeper investigation

Create an initial research map with main themes and subtopics identified.

## **Step 3: Deep dive into key areas**

For each identified key area, conduct detailed investigation:
- **Targeted searches**: Use specific queries for each subtopic
- **Multiple perspectives**: Seek diverse viewpoints and approaches
- **Technical details**: Gather specific data, statistics, methodologies, or technical specifications
- **Historical context**: Understand the evolution and background
- **Current state**: Identify latest developments and trends
- **Future outlook**: Look for predictions, projections, or emerging patterns

Document findings systematically, noting sources and credibility indicators.

## **Step 4: Cross-reference and validate findings**

Ensure accuracy and reliability:
- **Verify key facts**: Cross-check important information across multiple sources
- **Identify contradictions**: Note where sources disagree and investigate why
- **Assess source credibility**: Evaluate the authority and reliability of information sources
- **Check recency**: Ensure information is current and relevant
- **Look for consensus**: Identify where experts or multiple sources agree
- **Flag uncertainties**: Mark areas where information is unclear or disputed

Create a validated knowledge base with confidence levels for different findings.

## **Step 5: Synthesize and analyze information**

Transform collected data into insights:
- **Identify patterns**: Look for common themes, trends, or relationships
- **Draw connections**: Link concepts across different sources and subtopics
- **Generate insights**: Develop original observations based on the research
- **Compare and contrast**: Analyze similarities and differences between approaches or perspectives
- **Evaluate implications**: Consider the significance and consequences of findings
- **Address the research question**: Directly answer the original question with evidence

Build a coherent narrative that goes beyond mere compilation of facts.

## **Step 6: Generate structured research report**

Create a comprehensive, well-organized final report:

### Report Structure:
1. **Executive Summary**
   - Brief overview of research question
   - Key findings (3-5 main points)
   - Main conclusions

2. **Introduction**
   - Research scope and objectives
   - Methodology overview
   - Key areas explored

3. **Main Body** (organized by themes/topics)
   - Detailed findings for each key area
   - Supporting evidence and examples
   - Multiple perspectives where relevant
   - Data and statistics

4. **Analysis & Synthesis**
   - Patterns and connections identified
   - Cross-cutting themes
   - Insights and interpretations
   - Implications of findings

5. **Conclusions**
   - Direct answers to research questions
   - Summary of most significant findings
   - Limitations of the research

6. **Sources & References**
   - List of key sources consulted
   - Credibility assessment where relevant

### Report Quality Standards:
- **Clarity**: Use clear, precise language
- **Structure**: Logical organization with clear headings
- **Evidence-based**: Support claims with specific references
- **Balanced**: Present multiple viewpoints fairly
- **Depth**: Go beyond surface-level information
- **Actionable**: Provide insights that can inform decisions or understanding

## Best Practices

### Research Strategies:
- **Iterative approach**: Refine research questions as understanding deepens
- **Breadth before depth**: Start broad, then narrow focus to important areas
- **Follow the thread**: Let interesting findings guide additional research paths
- **Document as you go**: Keep organized notes throughout the process
- **Question assumptions**: Challenge initial hypotheses with evidence

### Information Quality:
- **Prefer primary sources**: When possible, go to original sources rather than summaries
- **Recent is better**: Prioritize current information, especially for fast-moving topics
- **Multiple sources**: Don't rely on a single source for important facts
- **Expert opinion**: Seek out recognized authorities in the field
- **Data over anecdotes**: Prefer statistical evidence to individual stories

### Analysis Techniques:
- **SWOT analysis**: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
- **Compare/Contrast**: Systematic comparison of different approaches or perspectives
- **Timeline analysis**: Understanding historical development and trends
- **Stakeholder analysis**: Identifying different perspectives and interests
- **Gap analysis**: Identifying what's missing or needs further research

## Common Pitfalls to Avoid

- **Confirmation bias**: Don't just look for information that supports initial assumptions
- **Information overload**: Know when enough research has been done
- **Outdated information**: Always check dates and currency of information
- **Single-source dependence**: Diversify sources to get complete picture
- **Analysis paralysis**: Balance thoroughness with timely completion
- **Losing focus**: Stay aligned with original research objectives

## Use Cases

This skill is ideal for:
- **Market research**: Understanding industries, competitors, or market trends
- **Technical investigation**: Deep dives into technologies, methodologies, or systems
- **Strategic planning**: Gathering intelligence for decision-making
- **Academic research**: Comprehensive literature reviews or topic exploration
- **Due diligence**: Thorough investigation before major decisions
- **Problem-solving**: Understanding complex problems before solution design
- **Trend analysis**: Identifying and understanding emerging patterns
- **Comparative analysis**: Evaluating multiple options or approaches

Overview

This skill performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic and delivers a structured, evidence-based report. It guides the process from defining scope through validation, synthesis, and final reporting to produce actionable insights. Designed for rigorous investigations, it balances depth, credibility, and clarity.

How this skill works

The skill follows a six-step workflow: define scope, conduct exploratory research, deep-dive into key areas, cross-reference and validate findings, synthesize insights, and generate a structured report. It collects and organizes source metadata, evaluates credibility and recency, highlights contradictions, and produces a report with executive summary, detailed findings, analysis, and references. Outputs include confidence levels, identified gaps, and recommended next steps.

When to use it

  • Preparing a market or competitive research brief
  • Conducting technical investigations or technology comparisons
  • Creating literature reviews or academic background research
  • Performing due diligence before strategic decisions
  • Producing trend analysis or forecasting reports

Best practices

  • Start with a clear research question, scope boundaries, and deliverable format
  • Begin broad then narrow: map high-level themes before deep-diving
  • Always cross-reference key facts across multiple authoritative sources
  • Document sources and credibility assessments as you go
  • Flag uncertainties and limit claims to supported evidence

Example use cases

  • Market research report: market size, competitors, trends, and strategic recommendations
  • Technology deep-dive: technical specs, evolution, vendor comparisons, and adoption outlook
  • Academic literature review: synthesized themes, gaps, and future research directions
  • Due diligence brief: verified facts, risk analysis, and evidence-backed conclusions
  • Product strategy research: user needs, competitive features, and prioritized recommendations

FAQ

What deliverable formats can I expect?

Reports are structured with an executive summary, methodology, detailed findings, analysis, conclusions, and sources; formats can be adapted to plain text, structured markdown, or export-ready outlines.

How is source credibility handled?

Each source is assessed for authority, recency, and relevance. Key facts are cross-checked and confidence levels are attached to major findings.

Can the research scope be changed mid-process?

Yes. The workflow is iterative: scope and questions can be refined as new evidence or gaps emerge, with changes tracked to preserve auditability.