home / skills / lerianstudio / ring / pricing-strategy

This skill analyzes pricing strategy data to generate models, competitive pricing insights, and actionable recommendations for product pricing.

npx playbooks add skill lerianstudio/ring --skill pricing-strategy

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (1)
SKILL.md
9.2 KB
---
name: pricing-strategy
description: |
  Pricing analysis skill for developing pricing models, competitive pricing analysis,
  and pricing recommendations for products and features.

trigger: |
  - New product pricing needed
  - Pricing optimization required
  - User requests "pricing strategy" or "pricing analysis"

skip_when: |
  - Market analysis not done → complete market-analysis first
  - Pure competitive analysis → use competitive-intelligence
  - Already have validated pricing → proceed to GTM
---

# Pricing Strategy

Comprehensive pricing analysis including pricing models, competitive analysis, and recommendations.

## Purpose

Pricing strategy determines how you capture value:
- Pricing model aligns with customer value perception
- Competitive pricing informs positioning
- Willingness to pay determines price ceiling
- Cost structure determines price floor

**HARD GATE:** Market analysis SHOULD be completed before pricing strategy for context.

## Process

### Phase 1: Pricing Context

Understand the pricing landscape:

```markdown
## Pricing Context

### Product/Feature Overview
**Product:** [Name]
**Value Proposition:** [Primary value prop]
**Target Segment:** [From market analysis]
**Competitive Category:** [From positioning]

### Current State (if applicable)
**Current Pricing:** [Existing pricing if updating]
**Current Revenue:** [Baseline]
**Current Conversion:** [Rate]
**Known Issues:** [Pain points with current pricing]

### Pricing Objectives
| Objective | Priority | Target |
|-----------|----------|--------|
| Revenue maximization | HIGH/MED/LOW | [Target] |
| Market penetration | HIGH/MED/LOW | [Target] |
| Competitive positioning | HIGH/MED/LOW | [Target] |
| Customer acquisition | HIGH/MED/LOW | [Target] |
| Margin optimization | HIGH/MED/LOW | [Target] |
```

### Phase 2: Pricing Model Analysis

Evaluate pricing model options:

```markdown
## Pricing Model Analysis

### Model Evaluation
| Model | Fit | Pros | Cons | Recommendation |
|-------|-----|------|------|----------------|
| Flat Rate | HIGH/MED/LOW | [List] | [List] | CONSIDER/REJECT |
| Tiered | HIGH/MED/LOW | [List] | [List] | CONSIDER/REJECT |
| Usage-Based | HIGH/MED/LOW | [List] | [List] | CONSIDER/REJECT |
| Per-Seat | HIGH/MED/LOW | [List] | [List] | CONSIDER/REJECT |
| Freemium | HIGH/MED/LOW | [List] | [List] | CONSIDER/REJECT |
| Hybrid | HIGH/MED/LOW | [List] | [List] | CONSIDER/REJECT |

### Recommended Model
**Model:** [Selected model]
**Rationale:**
1. [Reason 1]
2. [Reason 2]
3. [Reason 3]

### Model Structure
**Base:** [What's included in base]
**Variable:** [What scales with usage/seats]
**Add-ons:** [Optional extras]

### Packaging
| Tier | Features | Target Segment |
|------|----------|----------------|
| Free/Entry | [Feature list] | [Who it's for] |
| Standard | [Feature list] | [Who it's for] |
| Premium | [Feature list] | [Who it's for] |
| Enterprise | [Feature list] | [Who it's for] |
```

### Phase 3: Competitive Pricing Analysis

Analyze competitor pricing:

```markdown
## Competitive Pricing Analysis

### Competitor Pricing Matrix
| Competitor | Model | Entry Price | Mid Price | Enterprise | Notes |
|------------|-------|-------------|-----------|------------|-------|
| [Comp 1] | [Model] | $X/mo | $X/mo | Custom | [Key difference] |
| [Comp 2] | [Model] | $X/mo | $X/mo | Custom | [Key difference] |
| [Comp 3] | [Model] | $X/mo | $X/mo | Custom | [Key difference] |

### Price Positioning
**Market Range:** $X - $Y
**Average Price:** $X
**Premium Tier:** $X+
**Budget Tier:** <$X

### Positioning Decision
| Strategy | Price Point | Rationale |
|----------|-------------|-----------|
| Premium | Above market | [When appropriate] |
| Value | At market | [When appropriate] |
| Penetration | Below market | [When appropriate] |

**RECOMMENDATION:** [Strategy with rationale]

### Feature-Value Comparison
| Feature | Our Price | Comp A | Comp B | Value Gap |
|---------|-----------|--------|--------|-----------|
| [Feature 1] | $X | $Y | $Z | [Over/Under] |
| [Feature 2] | $X | $Y | $Z | [Over/Under] |
```

### Phase 4: Value-Based Pricing

Determine willingness to pay:

```markdown
## Value-Based Pricing

### Value Drivers
| Value Driver | Customer Impact | Quantification |
|--------------|-----------------|----------------|
| [Time saved] | [Hours/week] | [$X value] |
| [Cost reduced] | [% reduction] | [$X value] |
| [Revenue enabled] | [% increase] | [$X value] |

### Total Value Delivered
**Quantified Value:** $X per [time period]
**Value Capture Ratio:** X% (price / value delivered)
**Price Justification:** [How price relates to value]

### Willingness to Pay Research
**Method:** [Survey, interviews, conjoint analysis, Van Westendorp]
**Sample Size:** N
**Key Findings:**
- Price too cheap: $X
- Acceptable range: $X - $Y
- Price too expensive: $Y
- Maximum willingness: $Z

### Segment Pricing Sensitivity
| Segment | Price Sensitivity | Recommended Price |
|---------|-------------------|-------------------|
| [Segment 1] | HIGH/MED/LOW | $X |
| [Segment 2] | HIGH/MED/LOW | $X |
| [Segment 3] | HIGH/MED/LOW | $X |
```

### Phase 5: Pricing Recommendation

Synthesize into recommendation:

```markdown
## Pricing Recommendation

### Recommended Pricing
| Tier | Price | Billing | Features | Target |
|------|-------|---------|----------|--------|
| Free | $0 | N/A | [List] | [Segment] |
| Starter | $X/mo | Monthly/Annual | [List] | [Segment] |
| Pro | $X/mo | Monthly/Annual | [List] | [Segment] |
| Enterprise | Custom | Annual | [List] | [Segment] |

### Annual Discount
**Discount:** X%
**Rationale:** [Why this discount]

### Price Anchoring
**Anchor Price:** $X (Highest visible tier)
**Target Tier:** [Most recommended tier]
**Value Demonstration:** [How to show value]

### Revenue Projection
| Scenario | Assumptions | Year 1 Revenue |
|----------|-------------|----------------|
| Conservative | [Assumptions] | $X |
| Base | [Assumptions] | $X |
| Optimistic | [Assumptions] | $X |

### Implementation Plan
| Phase | Action | Timeline |
|-------|--------|----------|
| 1 | [Action] | [When] |
| 2 | [Action] | [When] |
| 3 | [Action] | [When] |

### Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|------------|--------|------------|
| Price too high | HIGH/MED/LOW | HIGH/MED/LOW | [Plan] |
| Price too low | HIGH/MED/LOW | HIGH/MED/LOW | [Plan] |
| Competitor response | HIGH/MED/LOW | HIGH/MED/LOW | [Plan] |
```

## Output Format

```markdown
# Pricing Strategy: [Product/Feature]

## Executive Summary
- **Recommended Model:** [Model type]
- **Price Range:** $X - $Y
- **Primary Tier:** $X/mo
- **Confidence Level:** HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW

## Pricing Context
[Phase 1 output]

## Model Analysis
[Phase 2 output]

## Competitive Analysis
[Phase 3 output]

## Value-Based Pricing
[Phase 4 output]

## Recommendation
[Phase 5 output]

## Next Steps
1. **Validation:** [Recommended validation approach]
2. **Stakeholder Approval:** [Who needs to approve]
3. **Implementation:** [Timeline and steps]

## Dependencies
- Market Analysis: [Link to market-analysis.md]
- Competitive Intel: [Link to competitive-intel.md]
- Positioning: [Link to positioning.md]
```

## Blocker Criteria

| Blocker | Action |
|---------|--------|
| No competitive pricing data | STOP. Research required. |
| Conflicting pricing objectives | STOP. Align stakeholders on priorities. |
| No willingness to pay data | STOP. Recommend research approach. |
| Cost structure unknown | STOP. Cannot set floor without costs. |

## Anti-Rationalization Table

See [shared-patterns/anti-rationalization.md](../shared-patterns/anti-rationalization.md) for universal anti-rationalizations.

### Gate-Specific Anti-Rationalizations

| Rationalization | Why It's WRONG | Required Action |
|-----------------|----------------|-----------------|
| "Match competitor pricing" | Competitor pricing serves their strategy, not yours | **Develop independent pricing based on your value** |
| "Lower price wins" | Race to bottom destroys value. Differentiate instead. | **Price based on value, not fear** |
| "We'll figure it out later" | Wrong pricing at launch damages brand and revenue | **Validate before launch** |
| "Pricing is just numbers" | Pricing communicates value. It's strategic. | **Treat as strategic decision** |

## Pressure Resistance

See [shared-patterns/pressure-resistance.md](../shared-patterns/pressure-resistance.md) for universal pressure scenarios.

### Gate-Specific Pressures

| Pressure Type | Request | Agent Response |
|---------------|---------|----------------|
| "Just undercut competitors" | "Price 20% below market" | "Undercutting signals low value. Pricing based on differentiation." |
| "Make it free to grow" | "Free tier will drive adoption" | "Free can work but requires strategy. Analyzing freemium viability." |
| "Don't worry about margins" | "Growth first, margins later" | "Unsustainable pricing kills companies. Ensuring viable margins." |

## Execution Report

Base metrics per [shared-patterns/execution-report.md](../shared-patterns/execution-report.md):

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Duration | Xm Ys |
| Iterations | N |
| Result | PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL |

### Gate-Specific Details
- models_evaluated: N
- competitors_analyzed: N
- willingness_to_pay_assessed: YES/NO
- recommendation_confidence: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW
- validation_status: PENDING/VALIDATED

Overview

This skill provides end-to-end pricing analysis to develop pricing models, run competitive pricing comparisons, and deliver actionable pricing recommendations for products and features. It focuses on aligning price with customer value, competitive positioning, and business objectives. The output is a structured recommendation with implementation steps and risks.

How this skill works

The skill inspects product context, current pricing state, market and competitive data, cost structure, and willingness-to-pay research. It evaluates candidate pricing models, benchmarks against competitors, quantifies value drivers, and synthesizes tiered pricing with revenue projections and an implementation plan. Hard gates enforce required market, cost, and competitive inputs before final recommendations.

When to use it

  • Designing initial pricing for a new product or feature launch
  • Revising pricing after changes in product positioning or costs
  • Benchmarking pricing versus competitors for strategic decisions
  • Validating price points with customer willingness-to-pay data
  • Preparing executive pricing proposals or go-to-market plans

Best practices

  • Complete market and competitive analysis before developing prices
  • Quantify customer value drivers to justify pricing (time saved, cost avoided, revenue enabled)
  • Test price sensitivity with surveys or conjoint analysis before rollout
  • Use tiering and anchoring to guide buyer choice and increase conversion
  • Set clear decision gates: cost floor, willingness-to-pay ceiling, and competitor map

Example use cases

  • Recommend a tiered subscription model with feature mapping for SMB and enterprise segments
  • Analyze competitor pricing to decide between premium or value positioning
  • Translate product metrics (time saved, transactions) into value-based price recommendations
  • Define trial, freemium, or usage-based structures and their revenue impact
  • Produce a phased implementation plan with validation experiments and projected revenue scenarios

FAQ

What inputs are required to produce a recommendation?

Required inputs are market analysis, competitor pricing data, cost structure, pricing objectives, and any existing pricing performance metrics.

What research methods support willingness-to-pay estimates?

Recommended methods include surveys, interviews, conjoint analysis, and Van Westendorp; sample size and segmentation should align with target customer groups.