home / skills / humanizerai / agent-skills / readability
This skill analyzes text readability using Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and SMOG, providing scores, interpretations, and practical improvement recommendations.
npx playbooks add skill humanizerai/agent-skills --skill readabilityReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: readability
description: Analyze text readability with Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, SMOG, and other metrics. Returns objective scores with interpretation and recommendations.
user-invocable: true
argument-hint: "[text to analyze]"
---
# Analyze Readability
Calculate and display readability metrics for the provided text.
## Input
The user provides text in $ARGUMENTS. If no text provided, ask for it.
## Metrics to Calculate
### Core Scores
| Metric | Formula | Interpretation |
|--------|---------|----------------|
| **Flesch Reading Ease** | 206.835 - 1.015(words/sentences) - 84.6(syllables/words) | 0-100, higher = easier |
| **Flesch-Kincaid Grade** | 0.39(words/sentences) + 11.8(syllables/words) - 15.59 | US grade level |
| **Gunning Fog Index** | 0.4[(words/sentences) + 100(complex words/words)] | Years of education |
| **SMOG Index** | 1.043 × √(complex words × 30/sentences) + 3.1291 | Grade level |
*Complex words = 3+ syllables*
### Text Statistics
- Word count
- Sentence count
- Average sentence length (words)
- Average word length (characters)
- Complex words count and %
- Passive voice sentences (estimate)
## Output Format
```
## Readability Analysis
### Scores
| Metric | Score | Meaning |
|--------|-------|---------|
| Flesch Reading Ease | [X] | [interpretation] |
| Flesch-Kincaid Grade | [X] | [grade level] |
| Gunning Fog | [X] | [years education] |
| SMOG | [X] | [grade level] |
### Statistics
- Words: [X]
- Sentences: [X]
- Avg sentence length: [X] words
- Complex words: [X] ([Y]%)
### Target Audience
[Who can easily read this based on scores]
### Recommendations
1. [Specific suggestion]
2. [Specific suggestion]
3. [Specific suggestion]
```
## Interpretation Guide
| Flesch Score | Grade | Audience |
|--------------|-------|----------|
| 90-100 | 5th | Very easy |
| 80-89 | 6th | Easy |
| 70-79 | 7th | Fairly easy |
| 60-69 | 8-9th | Standard |
| 50-59 | 10-12th | Fairly difficult |
| 30-49 | College | Difficult |
| 0-29 | Graduate | Very difficult |
## Recommendations
Based on scores, suggest:
- Sentences to shorten (if avg > 20 words)
- Complex words to simplify
- Passive voice to convert to active
- Specific examples of what to fix
This skill analyzes text readability using established formulas like Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade, Gunning Fog, and SMOG. It returns objective scores, interprets them for likely readers, and gives concrete recommendations to simplify or adjust the text. The output includes summary statistics and actionable edits to improve clarity.
You provide the text to analyze. The skill counts words, sentences, syllables and complex words (3+ syllables), estimates passive sentences, and computes core readability metrics. It maps numeric results to audience levels and produces targeted suggestions such as shortening sentences, replacing complex words, and converting passive constructions.
What does each score mean for my readers?
Flesch Reading Ease ranges 0–100 (higher = easier). Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and SMOG return approximate US grade levels or years of education required to understand the text.
How much text is needed for reliable results?
Short paragraphs work, but analysis is more reliable with several sentences (ideally 200+ words). Very short inputs can skew sentence- or syllable-based metrics.