home / skills / hexbee / hello-skills / multi-agent-systems
This skill helps you design and orchestrate multi-agent LLM architectures to improve task decomposition, parallelization, and verification.
npx playbooks add skill hexbee/hello-skills --skill multi-agent-systemsReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: multi-agent-systems
description: "Design and implement multi-agent LLM architectures using the orchestrator-subagent pattern. Use when: (1) Deciding whether to use multi-agent vs single-agent systems, (2) Implementing context isolation for high-volume operations, (3) Parallelizing independent research tasks, (4) Creating specialized agents with focused tool sets, (5) Building verification subagents for quality assurance, or (6) Analyzing context-centric decomposition boundaries."
---
# Multi-Agent Systems
## When to Use Multi-Agent Architectures
Multi-agent systems introduce overhead. Every additional agent represents another potential point of failure, another set of prompts to maintain, and another source of unexpected behavior.
**Multi-agent systems use 3-10x more tokens than single-agent approaches** due to:
- Duplicating context across agents
- Coordination messages between agents
- Summarizing results for handoffs
### Start with a Single Agent
A well-designed single agent with appropriate tools can accomplish far more than expected. Use single agent when:
- Tasks are sequential and context-dependent
- Tool count is under 15-20
- No clear benefit from parallelization
### Three Cases Where Multi-Agent Excels
1. **Context pollution** - Subtasks generate >1000 tokens but most info is irrelevant to main task
2. **Parallelization** - Tasks can run independently and explore larger search space
3. **Specialization** - Different tasks need different tools, prompts, or domain expertise
## Decision Framework
### Context Protection Pattern
Use when subtasks generate large context but only summary is needed for main task.
**Example: Customer Support**
```python
class OrderLookupAgent:
def lookup_order(self, order_id: str) -> dict:
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": f"Get essential details for order {order_id}"}]
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5", max_tokens=1024,
messages=messages, tools=[get_order_details_tool]
)
return extract_summary(response) # Returns 50-100 tokens, not 2000+
class SupportAgent:
def handle_issue(self, user_message: str):
if needs_order_info(user_message):
order_id = extract_order_id(user_message)
order_summary = OrderLookupAgent().lookup_order(order_id)
context = f"Order {order_id}: {order_summary['status']}, purchased {order_summary['date']}"
# Main agent gets clean context
```
**Best when:**
- Subtask generates >1000 tokens, most irrelevant
- Subtast is well-defined with clear extraction criteria
- Lookup/retrieval operations need filtering before use
### Parallelization Pattern
Use when exploring larger search space or independent research facets.
```python
import asyncio
from anthropic import AsyncAnthropic
client = AsyncAnthropic()
async def research_topic(query: str) -> dict:
facets = await lead_agent.decompose_query(query)
tasks = [research_subagent(facet) for facet in facets]
results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
return await lead_agent.synthesize(results)
async def research_subagent(facet: str) -> dict:
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": f"Research: {facet}"}]
response = await client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5", max_tokens=4096,
messages=messages, tools=[web_search, read_document]
)
return extract_findings(response)
```
**Benefit:** Thoroughness, not speed. Covers more ground at higher token cost.
### Specialization Patterns
#### Tool Set Specialization
Split by domain when agent has 20+ tools, shows domain confusion, or degraded performance.
**Signs you need specialization:**
1. Quantity: 20+ tools
2. Domain confusion: Tools span unrelated domains
3. Degraded performance: New tools hurt existing tasks
#### System Prompt Specialization
Different tasks require conflicting behavioral modes:
- Customer support: empathetic, patient
- Code review: precise, critical
- Compliance: rigid rule-following
- Brainstorming: creative flexibility
#### Domain Expertise Specialization
Deep domain context that would overwhelm a generalist:
- Legal analysis: case law, regulatory frameworks
- Medical research: clinical trial methodology
### Multi-Platform Integration Example
```python
class CRMAgent:
system_prompt = """You are a CRM specialist. You manage contacts,
opportunities, and account records. Always verify record ownership
before updates and maintain data integrity across related records."""
tools = [crm_get_contacts, crm_create_opportunity] # 8-10 CRM tools
class MarketingAgent:
system_prompt = """You are a marketing automation specialist. You
manage campaigns, lead scoring, and email sequences."""
tools = [marketing_get_campaigns, marketing_create_lead] # 8-10 tools
class OrchestratorAgent:
def execute(self, user_request: str):
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5", max_tokens=1024,
system="""Route to appropriate specialist:
- CRM: Contacts, opportunities, accounts, sales pipeline
- Marketing: Campaigns, lead nurturing, email sequences""",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": user_request}],
tools=[delegate_to_crm, delegate_to_marketing]
)
return response
```
## Context-Centric Decomposition
**Problem-centric (counterproductive):** Split by work type (writer, tester, reviewer) - creates coordination overhead, context loss at handoffs.
**Context-centric (effective):** Agent handling a feature also handles its tests - already has necessary context.
### Effective Boundaries
- Independent research paths
- Separate components with clean API contracts
- Blackbox verification
### Problematic Boundaries
- Sequential phases of same work
- Tightly coupled components
- Work requiring shared state
## Verification Subagent Pattern
Dedicated agent for testing/validating main agent's work. Succeeds because verification requires minimal context transfer.
```python
class CodingAgent:
def implement_feature(self, requirements: str) -> dict:
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5", max_tokens=4096,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": f"Implement: {requirements}"}],
tools=[read_file, write_file, list_directory]
)
return {"code": response.content, "files_changed": extract_files(response)}
class VerificationAgent:
def verify_implementation(self, requirements: str, files_changed: list) -> dict:
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": f"""
Requirements: {requirements}
Files changed: {files_changed}
Run the complete test suite and verify:
1. All existing tests pass
2. New functionality works as specified
3. No obvious errors or security issues
You MUST run: pytest --verbose
Only mark as PASSED if ALL tests pass with no failures.
"""}]
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5", max_tokens=4096,
messages=messages, tools=[run_tests, execute_code, read_file]
)
return {"passed": extract_pass_fail(response), "issues": extract_issues(response)}
```
### Mitigate "Early Victory Problem"
Verifier marks passing without thorough testing. Prevention:
- **Concrete criteria:** "Run full test suite" not "make sure it works"
- **Comprehensive checks:** Test multiple scenarios and edge cases
- **Negative tests:** Confirm inputs that should fail do fail
- **Explicit instructions:** "You MUST run the complete test suite"
## Moving Forward Checklist
Before adding multi-agent complexity:
1. [ ] Genuine constraints exist (context limits, parallelization, specialization need)
2. [ ] Decomposition follows context, not problem type
3. [ ] Clear verification points where subagents can validate
**Start with simplest approach that works. Add complexity only when evidence supports it.**
## References
- [Building multi-agent systems: when and how to use them](https://claude.com/blog/building-multi-agent-systems-when-and-how-to-use-them)
- [Building effective agents](https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/building-effective-agents)
- [Effective context engineering for AI agents](https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/effective-context-engineering-for-ai-agents)
- [Writing effective tools for agents](https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/writing-tools-for-agents)
This skill helps design and implement multi-agent LLM architectures using an orchestrator-subagent pattern. It guides when to choose multi-agent vs single-agent approaches, how to isolate context, parallelize research, specialize tool sets, and build verification subagents. The focus is practical patterns, trade-offs, and concrete boundaries for effective decomposition.
The skill provides patterns and code sketches for orchestrator-led workflows where a lead agent decomposes tasks and delegates to specialized subagents. Subagents run isolated contexts, return concise summaries, and the orchestrator synthesizes results. It covers context-protection, parallel research, tool specialization, and verification subagents with explicit instruction templates to reduce context pollution and coordination overhead.
How many agents should I use?
Use as few as possible. Typical deployments use 3–5 agents: an orchestrator, 1–3 specialists, and a verifier. Add more only with clear benefits.
Do multi-agent systems cost more?
Yes. Expect 3–10x token usage due to duplicated context and coordination messages; weigh gains in modularity, parallelism, or safety.