home / skills / georgekhananaev / claude-skills-vault / uiux-toolkit

uiux-toolkit skill

/.claude/skills/uiux-toolkit

This skill performs a comprehensive UX/UI evaluation across visual, accessibility, usability, and design system domains to improve interfaces and user flows.

npx playbooks add skill georgekhananaev/claude-skills-vault --skill uiux-toolkit

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (15)
SKILL.md
5.9 KB
---
name: uiux-toolkit
description: Comprehensive UX/UI evaluation meta-skill combining design theory and UX methodology. Use when conducting UI/UX audits, visual design reviews, accessibility compliance (WCAG 2.2), user flow analysis, responsive testing, interaction design evaluation, or design system audits. Evaluates using Nielsen's heuristics, Gestalt principles, typography theory, color theory, and modern methodologies (OOUX, JTBD, Cognitive Walkthrough).
---

# UI/UX Toolkit

Professional UX/UI evaluation across 9 domains. Combines design theory w/ UX methodology. Framework-agnostic for web, mobile & desktop.

## Audit Type Selection

| Need | Load |
|------|------|
| Full UX Audit | ALL references |
| Visual Design | visual-design.md + interaction-review.md |
| Accessibility | accessibility-inspector.md |
| Usability | heuristic-audit.md + user-flow-analysis.md |
| Responsive/Mobile | responsive-behavior.md |
| Design System | design-system-audit.md |
| Content | content-ux-audit.md |
| AI Interface | ai-ux-patterns.md |
| Privacy/Ethics | privacy-ethics-audit.md |

## Sub-Workflows

| Domain | Reference | Purpose |
|--------|-----------|---------|
| Visual | `references/visual-design.md` | Hierarchy, typography, color, Gestalt, spacing |
| Heuristic | `references/heuristic-audit.md` | Nielsen's 10 + modern methods |
| A11Y | `references/accessibility-inspector.md` | WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA, keyboard, screen readers |
| Flow | `references/user-flow-analysis.md` | Task paths, friction, cognitive load |
| Responsive | `references/responsive-behavior.md` | Breakpoints, touch, RTL/LTR, PWA |
| Interactions | `references/interaction-review.md` | Micro-interactions, animations, feedback |
| Design System | `references/design-system-audit.md` | Token consistency, component audit |
| Content | `references/content-ux-audit.md` | UX writing, readability, voice & tone |
| AI/ML | `references/ai-ux-patterns.md` | Explainability, trust, error handling |
| Privacy | `references/privacy-ethics-audit.md` | Dark patterns, consent, GDPR/DSA |

## Quick Start

### 1. Define Scope

```
Audit Scope:
├── Screens: [target screens]
├── Flows: [primary tasks, conversion paths]
├── Platform: [Web/iOS/Android/Desktop/All]
├── WCAG: [A/AA/AAA]
└── Focus: [Visual/A11Y/Usability/Perf]
```

### 2. Select Type

| Type | Refs | Coverage |
|------|------|----------|
| Quick Visual | visual-design.md | Design theory |
| Quick A11Y | accessibility-inspector.md | Automated + keyboard |
| Heuristic | heuristic-audit.md | Nielsen's 10 |
| Full | All 9 refs | Complete eval |
| Focused | 2-3 refs | Targeted review |

### 3. Execute

Each ref contains checklists w/ pass/fail criteria, severity & remediation.

## Severity

| Level | Impact | Action |
|-------|--------|--------|
| 🔴 Critical | Blocks task/access | Fix immediately |
| 🟠 Major | >50% users affected | Fix before release |
| 🟡 Minor | <50% users affected | Next sprint |
| 🟢 Enhancement | Polish/delight | Backlog |

### Priority Matrix

```
         HIGH FREQ
            │
    ┌───────┼───────┐
    │ MAJOR │ CRIT  │
    │ (P1)  │ (P0)  │
LOW ├───────┼───────┤ HIGH
IMP │ ENH   │ MINOR │ IMP
    │ (P3)  │ (P2)  │
    └───────┼───────┘
         LOW FREQ
```

### Effort

| Level | Examples |
|-------|----------|
| Low | CSS fix, alt text, label |
| Med | Component refactor, validation |
| High | Nav restructure, focus mgmt |

## Quick Checklist

```
□ Hierarchy    → Importance clear? (Squint test)
□ Typography   → Readable, scale, max 2-3 fonts?
□ Color        → Contrast, semantic, 60-30-10?
□ Spacing      → 8pt grid, consistent rhythm?
□ Gestalt      → Items grouped logically?
□ Usability    → Actions discoverable, feedback clear?
□ A11Y         → WCAG AA, keyboard, screen reader?
□ Consistency  → Design system followed?
□ Content      → Clear, scannable, actionable?
□ Responsive   → All breakpoints, touch-friendly?
```

## Scoring

| Grade | Criteria |
|-------|----------|
| A | Professional, polished, accessible, delightful |
| B | Solid fundamentals, minor refinements |
| C | Functional w/ notable issues |
| D | Usable w/ significant problems |
| F | Major usability/a11y failures |

## Output Format

```markdown
## UX Eval: [Component/Page]

### Scope
- Platform: [Web/iOS/Android]
- WCAG: [AA/AAA]
- Domains: [List]

### Assessment
[1-2 sentence summary + grade A-F]

### Critical (P0)
- **[Issue]**: [Desc]
  - *Principle*: [violated]
  - *Fix*: [rec]
  - *Effort*: [L/M/H]

### Major (P1) / Minor (P2) / Enhancements (P3)
[Same format]

### Strengths
- [What works]

### Priority Actions
1. [Top fix]
2. [Second]
3. [Third]
```

## Anti-Patterns

| Pattern | Category | Sev |
|---------|----------|-----|
| Confirm-shaming | Dark | 🔴 |
| Hidden costs | Dark | 🔴 |
| Keyboard traps | A11Y | 🔴 |
| No loading feedback | Visibility | 🟠 |
| Color-only indicators | A11Y | 🟠 |
| Auto-play video+sound | Attention | 🟠 |
| Infinite scroll w/o footer | Nav | 🟡 |

## Methodologies

| Method | Focus | Use |
|--------|-------|-----|
| Cognitive Walkthrough | Task completion | Complex flows |
| OOUX | Object-noun consistency | IA |
| JTBD | Job stories | Feature validation |
| Gestalt | Visual grouping | Layout |
| Baymard | E-commerce | Shopping flows |

## Platform Testing

| Platform | Auto | Manual |
|----------|------|--------|
| Web | axe-core, Lighthouse | DevTools, keyboard |
| iOS | Accessibility Inspector | VoiceOver |
| Android | Accessibility Scanner | TalkBack |
| Design | Stark, Contrast plugins | Review |

---

Load `references/*.md` for detailed checklists & criteria.

Overview

This skill is a comprehensive UX/UI evaluation meta-skill that combines design theory and practical UX methodologies to produce repeatable, actionable audits. It covers visual design, usability heuristics, accessibility (WCAG 2.2), responsive behavior, interaction review, and design system consistency for web, mobile, and desktop. Use it to generate prioritized findings, severity-based remediation, and clear next steps for teams.

How this skill works

Select an audit scope (screens, flows, platform, WCAG level, focus areas) and one of the audit types (quick visual, quick A11Y, heuristic, full, or focused). The skill runs checklists mapped to nine domains—visual, heuristic, accessibility, flow, responsive, interactions, design system, content, and privacy—and outputs graded assessments with P0–P3 priorities, severity, effort estimates, and fixes. Deliverables follow a structured report format with strengths, critical items, and priority actions.

When to use it

  • Before a release to catch usability and accessibility regressions
  • During design reviews to validate hierarchy, typography, spacing, and Gestalt principles
  • When auditing accessibility to meet WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA requirements
  • To evaluate responsive behavior and touch/keyboard interactions across breakpoints
  • When assessing or maturing a design system for token and component consistency

Best practices

  • Define scope clearly: screens, key flows, platform, and WCAG target before starting
  • Combine automated tools (axe, Lighthouse) with manual keyboard and screen reader checks
  • Prioritize fixes by impact and frequency using the provided priority matrix
  • Reference concrete pass/fail checklist items and estimate effort (Low/Med/High)
  • Include short, actionable remediation with the violated principle and recommended pattern

Example use cases

  • Full UX audit for a web app pre-launch with WCAG AA acceptance criteria
  • Quick visual review of a marketing landing page to improve conversion and hierarchy
  • Heuristic audit using Nielsen’s principles for a complex admin dashboard
  • Accessibility triage to fix critical keyboard traps and color-contrast failures
  • Design system audit to align tokens, component variants, and documentation

FAQ

What outputs does the skill produce?

A structured UX evaluation: scope, 1–2 sentence summary with grade (A–F), Critical/Major/Minor/Enhancement lists, strengths, and a prioritized action list with effort estimates.

How are severities and priorities determined?

Severity is based on user impact (Critical, Major, Minor, Enhancement). Priority combines severity and frequency using a 2x2 priority matrix to assign P0–P3.