home / skills / fusengine / agents / research
This skill conducts rigorous research using sequential thinking, Context7, and Exa to produce documented insights with sourced recommendations.
npx playbooks add skill fusengine/agents --skill researchReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: research
description: Technical research methodology using Context7, Exa, and Sequential Thinking for documentation, best practices, and complex investigations.
argument-hint: "[topic] [--deep]"
context: fork
agent: fuse-ai-pilot:research-expert
user-invocable: false
---
**Session:** ${CLAUDE_SESSION_ID}
**Research Topic:** $ARGUMENTS
# Research Skill
## Research Workflows
### Standard Query
```
1. THINK → Sequential Thinking decomposition
2. RESOLVE → Context7 resolve-library-id
3. DOCUMENT → Context7 query-docs (5000-10000 tokens)
4. SUPPLEMENT → Exa code context search
5. SYNTHESIZE → Structured answer with sources
```
### Complex Investigation
```
1. DEEP THINK → Multi-hypothesis Sequential Thinking
2. DEEP RESEARCH → Exa deep researcher (45s-2min)
3. MONITOR → Check status until completed
4. VALIDATE → Cross-check Context7 official sources
5. REPORT → Comprehensive solution
```
### Technology Trends
```
1. WEB SCAN → Exa search latest developments
2. CODE PATTERNS → Exa code context for practices
3. ECOSYSTEM → Company research for key players
4. ANALYSIS → Sequential Thinking for implications
5. RECOMMENDATIONS → Actionable insights
```
## Context7 Usage
```typescript
// Step 1: Resolve library ID
mcp__context7__resolve-library-id({
libraryName: "next.js",
query: "App Router server actions"
})
// Step 2: Query docs
mcp__context7__query-docs({
libraryId: "/vercel/next.js",
query: "server actions authentication"
})
```
**Best Practices**:
- Always `resolve-library-id` BEFORE `query-docs`
- Specify `topic` parameter to focus retrieval
- Start with 5000 tokens, increase to 10000 if needed
- Handle variations: "nextjs" vs "/vercel/next.js"
## Exa Search Types
| Type | Use Case | Time | numResults |
|------|----------|------|------------|
| `fast` | Quick lookups | <5s | 3-5 |
| `auto` | Balanced | 5-15s | 5-8 |
| `deep` | Comprehensive | 15-45s | 8+ |
```typescript
// Code context search
mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa({
query: "Next.js 16 server actions authentication",
tokensNum: 5000
})
// Web search
mcp__exa__web_search_exa({
query: "React 2025 best practices",
type: "auto",
numResults: 5
})
```
## Exa Deep Research
**Reserve for** investigations requiring >30min manual effort.
```typescript
// Start research
const { taskId } = await mcp__exa__deep_researcher_start({
instructions: "Compare authentication solutions for Node.js",
model: "exa-research-pro" // or "exa-research" for faster
})
// Poll until complete
mcp__exa__deep_researcher_check({ taskId })
```
**Models**:
- `exa-research`: Standard depth (15-45s)
- `exa-research-pro`: Complex topics (45s-2min)
## Sequential Thinking
```typescript
mcp__sequential-thinking__sequentialthinking({
thought: "Analyzing authentication approaches",
thoughtNumber: 1,
totalThoughts: 5,
nextThoughtNeeded: true,
// Optional for revisions:
isRevision: false,
revisesThought: null,
branchId: null,
branchFromThought: null,
needsMoreThoughts: false
})
```
**Best Practices**:
- Start with realistic `totalThoughts`, adjust dynamically
- Use `isRevision: true` to reconsider hypotheses
- Create branches (`branchId`) for alternatives
- Set `needsMoreThoughts: true` if incomplete
## Multi-Source Synthesis
**Parallelization**:
- Run `resolve-library-id` + `web_search_exa` simultaneously
- Launch multiple Exa searches concurrently
- Execute Context7 docs + Exa code search in parallel
**Source Priority**:
1. Official documentation (Context7)
2. Recent tutorials (Exa, <6 months)
3. Older content (with version verification)
## Response Format
```markdown
## 🔍 Research: [Topic]
### Methodology
- Sequential Thinking: [N thoughts, M revisions]
- Context7: [Library@version consulted]
- Exa: [Search types performed]
### Key Findings
1. **[Finding 1]** (Source: [URL])
- Technical details
- Code examples
2. **[Finding 2]** (Source: [URL])
### Recommendations
- [Action 1]: [Why + How]
- [Action 2]: [Why + How]
### Sources
- Context7: [Exact library IDs]
- Exa: [X results analyzed]
- Deep Research: [Task ID if used]
```
## Error Handling
**Context7 Failures**:
- Verify library name spelling
- Try different formats ("/org/project" vs "project-name")
- Fallback to Exa code context
**Exa Timeouts**:
- Reduce `numResults`
- Simplify query
- Switch `type: "deep"` → `type: "fast"`
**Sequential Thinking Blocks**:
- Revise with `isRevision: true`
- Increase `totalThoughts`
- Create new branch
## Forbidden Behaviors
- ❌ Guess library IDs without `resolve-library-id`
- ❌ Start deep researcher without checking completion
- ❌ Mix opinions with facts without distinction
- ❌ Provide code without version verification
- ❌ Ignore WebFetch redirects
- ❌ Recommend without citing sources
- ❌ Skip Sequential Thinking for multi-step problems
This skill provides a technical research methodology that combines Context7, Exa, and Sequential Thinking to produce verifiable documentation, best practices, and deep investigations. It is designed for engineers and researchers who need reproducible source-backed answers and structured recommendations. The workflow emphasizes parallel searches, iterative hypothesis testing, and strict source prioritization.
The skill decomposes problems with Sequential Thinking, resolves library identifiers via Context7, then queries documentation at scale (5k–10k tokens). It supplements docs with Exa code and web searches (fast/auto/deep) and can launch Exa deep-research tasks for heavyweight investigations. Results are synthesized into structured reports with cited sources and clear recommendations.
What search types should I pick for Exa?
Use fast for quick lookups (<5s), auto for balanced results (5–15s), and deep for comprehensive searches (15–45s) depending on scope.
When should I use Exa deep researcher?
Reserve it for investigations that would take more than ~30 minutes manually or need multi-step synthesis; choose exa-research-pro for the most complex topics.