home / skills / cklxx / elephant.ai / email-drafting
This skill drafts structured bilingual emails for new messages and replies, aligning audience, purpose, tone, and CTAs to save time and ensure clarity.
npx playbooks add skill cklxx/elephant.ai --skill email-draftingReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: email-drafting
description: 快速拉齐受众、目的、语气和 CTA 的邮件写作 SOP,覆盖新建邮件与回复线程两种常见场景。
---
# 邮件写作(新邮件与线程回复)
## When to use this skill
- 需要撰写或回复英文/中文工作邮件,确保信息完整、语气得体、CTA 明确。
- 需要整理零散信息,输出结构化邮件草稿(主题、背景、决策/请求、后续行动)。
## 必备输入
- **受众与关系**:收件人/抄送是谁?决策人/执行人/知情人各是谁?
- **目的**:通知/请求决策/对齐事实/推动行动/风险预警?
- **上下文**:相关链接、附件、已讨论结论或未决问题。
- **语气**:正式/简洁/友好;是否需要中英双语。
- **期限**:期待回复或完成的时间点。
## 工作流
1. **整理要点**:一句话说明目的;列出关键事实与未决点;写出希望对方行动或回复的具体项。
2. **确定结构**:
- 新邮件:`Subject → Opening → Context → Key points/Decisions → Requests/CTAs → Next steps → Thanks`。
- 线程回复:先引用/确认上条消息的关键信息,再补充更新/结论/阻塞,最后给出明确 CTA。
3. **起草文本**:保持短句;每段只覆盖一个主题;数字/日期/owners 用粗体或列表凸显。
4. **检查三件事**:
- 主题是否包含核心动作/对象(如 `[Action Needed] API rollout plan by Fri`)。
- CTA 是否可执行且可见(Owner + 截止时间 + 成功标准)。
- 附件/链接是否齐全且命名清晰。
5. **输出格式**:先给出主题行,正文按段落+列表呈现;如需多语言,先主语言再附简要译文。
## 回复模板(示例)
- **确认并推进**:
```
Subject: Re: <原主题>
Thanks for the update. Summary: <一句话总结>.
✅ Actions: <列出已完成或正在进行事项>.
🔜 Next: <下一步动作 + 负责人 + 时间>.
Blockers/asks: <需要对方决策/资源/信息>.
```
- **澄清需求**:明确缺失信息列表,邀请对方补充。
## 最终检查清单
- 主题直截了当,正文开头 2 句话能让新读者知道“我需要你做什么”。
- 所有日期都有时区,金额/度量单位标注清楚。
- 收件人与抄送合理(决策在 TO,知情在 CC)。
This skill provides a compact SOP for drafting new emails and replying in threads to align audience, purpose, tone, and CTAs quickly. It turns scattered facts into structured subject lines, concise context, clear requests, and measurable next steps. Use it to produce single- or bilingual drafts ready to send.
You supply audience details, purpose, context, preferred tone, and any deadlines. The skill organizes key facts and open items, chooses the correct structure for a new message or a thread reply, and drafts subject + body with explicit CTAs, owners, and timelines. It includes a short checklist to verify subject clarity, CTA executability, and attachment completeness.
Should I include recipients and roles when drafting?
Yes. Specify who is decision-maker, doer, and informed so the CTA can assign owners correctly.
How do I handle attachments and links?
Name attachments clearly, list them in the body, and ensure links are accessible and described.