home / skills / chrislemke / stoffy / genealogical-method

genealogical-method skill

/.claude/skills/genealogical-method

This skill applies Nietzschean and Foucauldian genealogy to analyze the contingent origins of concepts and practices, uncovering power relations in the present.

npx playbooks add skill chrislemke/stoffy --skill genealogical-method

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (1)
SKILL.md
7.7 KB
---
name: genealogical-method
description: "Master genealogical methodology - Nietzschean and Foucauldian genealogy of concepts and practices. Use for: historical analysis, power, origins of concepts. Triggers: 'genealogy', 'genealogical', 'Nietzsche genealogy', 'Foucault', 'archaeology', 'power knowledge', 'origin of', 'history of', 'emergence', 'descent', 'Entstehung', 'Herkunft', 'moral history'."
---

# Genealogical Method Skill

Master genealogical analysis: tracing the contingent historical emergence of concepts, practices, and institutions to reveal hidden power relations and challenge present assumptions.

## Overview

### What Is Genealogy?

NOT:
- History of ideas (how ideas develop logically)
- Origin stories (single founding moment)
- Teleological progress (development toward goal)

IS:
- History of the present (why we are as we are)
- Contingent emergence (could have been otherwise)
- Power analysis (whose interests served?)
- Destabilization (question what seems natural)

### Two Major Forms

| Nietzschean | Foucauldian |
|-------------|-------------|
| *Genealogy of Morals* | *Discipline and Punish*, *History of Sexuality* |
| Origin of moral values | Constitution of subjects |
| Ressentiment, will to power | Power/knowledge |
| Unmask slave morality | Unmask normalization |

---

## Nietzschean Genealogy

### Core Project

Trace how moral values ("good," "evil") emerged
- Not from reason or nature
- From historical struggles, power relations
- To reveal: morality serves interests

### Key Concepts

```
NIETZSCHEAN GENEALOGY
═════════════════════

MASTER MORALITY
├── Created by the strong, noble
├── Good = powerful, noble, beautiful
├── Bad = weak, common, ugly
└── Self-affirming, active

SLAVE MORALITY
├── Created by the weak against masters
├── Good = humble, meek, suffering
├── Evil = powerful, proud, strong
├── Reactive, born of ressentiment

RESSENTIMENT
├── Resentment of the powerful
├── Inability to act directly
├── Revenge through revaluation
└── "The last shall be first"

WILL TO POWER
├── Not political domination
├── Self-overcoming, creativity
├── Life's fundamental drive
└── Behind all valuations
```

### The Three Essays (*Genealogy of Morals*)

1. **Good and Evil, Good and Bad**
   - Master vs. slave moralities
   - Priestly revaluation

2. **Guilt, Bad Conscience, and Related Matters**
   - Origin of guilt from debt
   - Internalization of instincts
   - Self-torture

3. **Ascetic Ideals**
   - Why asceticism appealing?
   - Will to nothingness rather than no will
   - Science as latest ascetic form

---

## Foucauldian Genealogy

### Core Project

Show how present forms of subjectivity, knowledge, and power were historically constituted
- Not necessary or natural
- Through specific practices, institutions
- Could be otherwise

### Key Concepts

```
FOUCAULDIAN GENEALOGY
═════════════════════

POWER/KNOWLEDGE
├── Not separable
├── Knowledge is a form of power
├── Power produces knowledge
└── No neutral standpoint

DISCOURSE
├── Systems of statements
├── Produce objects, subjects
├── Govern what can be said/thought
└── Historical, changeable

DISCIPLINE
├── Techniques of power over bodies
├── Surveillance, normalization
├── Creates docile bodies
└── Schools, prisons, hospitals

BIOPOWER
├── Power over populations
├── Statistics, demographics
├── "Make live, let die"
└── Governmentality
```

### Foucault's Terms (from "Nietzsche, Genealogy, History")

| Term | German | Meaning |
|------|--------|---------|
| Entstehung | Emergence | Moment of arising from forces |
| Herkunft | Descent | Multiple origins, not single source |
| Ursprung | Origin | (Rejected) Mythical single origin |

### Example: Punishment (*Discipline and Punish*)

```
GENEALOGY OF PUNISHMENT
═══════════════════════

SOVEREIGN POWER (Pre-modern)
├── Public spectacle of torture
├── Display monarch's power
├── Excess, vengeance
└── Body as target

TRANSITION
├── Humanitarian reform?
├── Or: New economy of power
├── Efficiency, not mercy
└── New targets, new techniques

DISCIPLINARY POWER (Modern)
├── Prison, rehabilitation
├── Surveillance (Panopticon)
├── Normalize, not destroy
├── Soul as target
└── Produces useful subjects
```

---

## Method: Doing Genealogy

### Foucault's "Prescriptions" (adapted)

```
GENEALOGICAL PROTOCOL
═════════════════════

1. PROBLEMATIZE THE PRESENT
   └── What seems natural, inevitable, obvious?
   └── What present practice do we want to understand?

2. TRACE DESCENT (Herkunft)
   └── Multiple, scattered origins
   └── Not single noble origin
   └── Look for accidents, contingencies

3. IDENTIFY EMERGENCE (Entstehung)
   └── What forces clashed to produce this?
   └── What power relations are at work?
   └── Who benefits?

4. SHOW DISCONTINUITIES
   └── Ruptures, not smooth development
   └── Different epistemes, different rationalities
   └── Things were otherwise

5. REVEAL POWER/KNOWLEDGE
   └── What counts as knowledge?
   └── What practices constitute subjects?
   └── What is normalized, excluded?

6. DESTABILIZE
   └── Show contingency
   └── Open space for critique
   └── Possibilities for change
```

### Avoiding Whig History

**Don't**:
- Read past through present categories
- See history as progress toward now
- Find single origin for complex phenomena
- Ignore discontinuities and accidents

**Do**:
- Respect difference of past
- See present as contingent outcome
- Trace multiple, conflicting forces
- Highlight ruptures and transformations

---

## Applications

### Genealogy of Concepts

What is the history of:
- "Sexuality" (Foucault)
- "Madness" (Foucault)
- "Justice" (could be done)
- "Consciousness" (could be done)

### Genealogy of Practices

- Punishment (Foucault)
- Confession (Foucault)
- Examination (Foucault)
- Self-help (could be done)

### Genealogy of Subjects

- "The homosexual" as identity type
- "The criminal" as subject
- "The normal person" as norm

---

## Output Format

```markdown
## Genealogy of [CONCEPT/PRACTICE]

### Present Problematic
[What seems natural today that we want to question?]

### Descent (Herkunft)
[Multiple scattered origins, not single source]
- Origin thread 1
- Origin thread 2
- Origin thread 3

### Emergence (Entstehung)
[What forces clashed? What power relations?]

### Key Discontinuities
[Where did things change? Ruptures, not smooth development]

### Power/Knowledge Analysis
[Who benefits? What is normalized? What is excluded?]

### Destabilization
[How does this history open critique?]
[What alternatives become visible?]
```

---

## Key Vocabulary

| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| Genealogy | Historical critique of present |
| Descent (Herkunft) | Multiple, scattered origins |
| Emergence (Entstehung) | Arising from struggle |
| Episteme | Historical conditions of knowledge |
| Discourse | System of statements producing objects |
| Apparatus (dispositif) | Network of power relations |
| Normalization | Making conform to norms |
| Ressentiment | Reactive resentment (Nietzsche) |
| Archaeology | Earlier Foucault: uncovering epistemes |
| History of the present | Genealogy's aim |

---

## Integration with Repository

### Related Skills
- `continental-critical`: Foucault in context
- `german-idealism-existentialism`: Nietzsche's context

### For Thought Development
Use genealogy to question assumptions in your philosophical explorations.

Overview

This skill teaches genealogical methodology for tracing the contingent historical emergence of concepts, practices, and subjects through Nietzschean and Foucauldian lenses. It shows how to interrogate what appears natural by revealing power relations, ruptures, and alternative possibilities. The aim is practical: equip analysts to produce a genealogy of the present that destabilizes received assumptions.

How this skill works

The skill guides users through a structured protocol: problematize the present, trace descent (multiple origins), identify emergence (forces and clashes), mark discontinuities, and analyze power/knowledge relations. It supplies conceptual tools (ressentiment, will to power, discourse, discipline, biopower) and a reproducible output template for producing genealogies of concepts and practices. Examples and prompts help translate theory into empirical historical analysis.

When to use it

  • When you want to expose how a concept or practice became taken as natural or inevitable
  • When investigating the institutional history of power, surveillance, or normalization
  • When analyzing how subjects (e.g., ‘the criminal’, ‘the patient’, ‘the sexual subject’) were constituted
  • When preparing critical historical background for policy critique or cultural analysis
  • When teaching or learning critical methods in philosophy, history, or social theory

Best practices

  • Problemize current norms before reading past sources—avoid projecting present categories backward
  • Look for multiple, scattered origins rather than a single founding moment
  • Pay attention to discontinuities, accidents, and contingent decisions
  • Connect practices to institutions and material techniques (e.g., surveillance, records, exams)
  • Use power/knowledge as an analytic lens: ask who benefits and what is rendered unthinkable

Example use cases

  • Produce a genealogy of punishment showing the shift from sovereign spectacle to disciplinary regimes
  • Trace the emergence of ‘sexuality’ as an object of knowledge and governance
  • Analyze the history of a medical category to reveal institutional practices that created it
  • Map how corporate HR practices normalize certain worker subjectivities and exclude others
  • Develop classroom assignments that train students to write short genealogies of contemporary concepts

FAQ

Is genealogy the same as history of ideas?

No. Genealogy focuses on contingent, power-laden emergence of the present, not linear intellectual development or a single origin story.

Can genealogy be applied empirically?

Yes. Use archival records, institutional documents, practices, and statistical regimes to trace descent, emergence, and ruptures.