home / skills / chrislemke / stoffy / continental-critical

continental-critical skill

/.claude/skills/continental-critical

This skill helps you analyze continental philosophy and critical theory to illuminate text, critique ideology, and reveal power structures in discourse.

npx playbooks add skill chrislemke/stoffy --skill continental-critical

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (1)
SKILL.md
13.5 KB
---
name: continental-critical
description: "Master Continental philosophy and Critical Theory. Use for: post-structuralism, deconstruction, Frankfurt School, hermeneutics, psychoanalysis. Triggers: 'Foucault', 'power/knowledge', 'deconstruction', 'Derrida', 'différance', 'critical theory', 'Frankfurt School', 'Adorno', 'Habermas', 'genealogy', 'discourse', 'Lacan', 'Deleuze', 'rhizome', 'biopolitics', 'ideology', 'alienation', 'reification', 'hermeneutics', 'Gadamer', 'post-structuralism', 'logocentrism'."
---

# Continental & Critical Philosophy Skill

Master the Continental tradition and Critical Theory—philosophical approaches emphasizing history, power, language, interpretation, and social critique.

## Overview

### Distinct from Analytic Philosophy

| Analytic | Continental |
|----------|-------------|
| Logic and argument | Interpretation and critique |
| Clear definitions | Evocative language |
| Timeless problems | Historical consciousness |
| Science as model | Art, literature as models |
| Individual propositions | Textual totalities |
| Neutral stance | Engaged critique |

### Historical Development

```
ROOTS
├── Hegel: Dialectic, history
├── Marx: Critique, ideology
├── Nietzsche: Genealogy, perspectivism
└── Freud: Unconscious, repression

PHENOMENOLOGY-HERMENEUTICS
├── Husserl: Phenomenological method
├── Heidegger: Hermeneutics of Dasein
├── Gadamer: Philosophical hermeneutics
└── Ricoeur: Hermeneutics of suspicion

FRANKFURT SCHOOL (Critical Theory)
├── First generation: Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse
├── Benjamin: Aura, historical materialism
└── Second generation: Habermas

STRUCTURALISM → POST-STRUCTURALISM
├── Saussure: Structural linguistics
├── Lévi-Strauss: Structural anthropology
├── Lacan: Structural psychoanalysis
├── Foucault: Archaeology, genealogy
├── Derrida: Deconstruction
└── Deleuze: Difference, rhizomatics
```

---

## Hermeneutics

### Gadamer: Philosophical Hermeneutics

**Central Insight**: Understanding is always situated

**Key Concepts**:
```
GADAMERIAN HERMENEUTICS
═══════════════════════

PREJUDICE (Vorurteil)
├── Not negative; pre-judgment necessary for understanding
├── We always approach texts with expectations
└── Productive: enables understanding

HORIZON
├── Range of vision from a particular standpoint
├── Limited but expandable
└── Understanding as "fusion of horizons"

TRADITION (Überlieferung)
├── We stand in tradition; cannot step outside
├── Tradition is enabling, not just constraining
└── Classics speak across time

DIALOGUE
├── Understanding as conversation
├── Question-answer structure
└── The text puts questions to us

EFFECTIVE-HISTORICAL CONSCIOUSNESS
├── Awareness that we are shaped by history
├── No "view from nowhere"
└── Self-understanding through historical situatedness
```

**Hermeneutic Circle**:
- Parts understood through whole
- Whole understood through parts
- Not vicious but productive
- Entry through fore-understanding

### Ricoeur: Hermeneutics of Suspicion

**Two Hermeneutics**:
1. **Hermeneutics of Trust**: Receive meaning
2. **Hermeneutics of Suspicion**: Unmask hidden forces

**Masters of Suspicion**:
| Thinker | Hidden Force | Unmasked |
|---------|--------------|----------|
| Marx | Economic interests | Ideology as false consciousness |
| Nietzsche | Will to power | Morality as ressentiment |
| Freud | Unconscious desire | Consciousness as surface |

---

## Critical Theory (Frankfurt School)

### Core Project

**Critique of Instrumental Reason**:
- Enlightenment promised liberation through reason
- But reason became instrumental (means-ends calculation)
- Domination of nature → domination of humans
- Modern society: administered, reified, unfree

### Horkheimer & Adorno: Dialectic of Enlightenment

**Thesis**: Enlightenment contains seeds of its own destruction

**The Culture Industry**:
```
CULTURE INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
═════════════════════════

MASS CULTURE
├── Standardized products (films, music, etc.)
├── Pseudo-individualization (apparent variety, deep sameness)
├── Entertainment as distraction
└── Forecloses critical thought

EFFECTS
├── Passivity: spectators, not participants
├── Conformity: think like everyone else
├── False needs: created by advertising
└── Regression: infantilization

TOTALITY
├── No outside: culture industry is everywhere
├── Resistance absorbed: rebellion becomes style
└── Art reduced to commodity
```

### Marcuse: One-Dimensional Man

**Thesis**: Advanced industrial society creates "one-dimensional" humans

**Concepts**:
| Concept | Meaning |
|---------|---------|
| Repressive desublimation | Sexual liberation that serves domination |
| False needs | Needs imposed by social systems |
| The Great Refusal | Rejection of the whole system |
| One-dimensionality | Loss of critical negativity |

### Benjamin: Art and History

**The Aura**:
- Unique presence of original artwork
- "Here and now" of authentic existence
- Mechanical reproduction destroys aura
- Ambivalent: loss of cult value, gain of political potential

**Theses on History**:
- History as continuous catastrophe
- "Angel of History" blown backward by progress
- Revolutionary interruption of continuum
- "Brush history against the grain"

### Habermas: Communicative Reason

**Critique of First Generation**:
- Too pessimistic about reason
- Performative contradiction: using reason to critique reason
- Need to distinguish types of reason

**Solution**:
```
TWO TYPES OF REASON
═══════════════════

INSTRUMENTAL REASON
├── Means-ends calculation
├── Technical control
├── Monological
└── System/lifeworld colonization

COMMUNICATIVE REASON
├── Oriented to understanding
├── Intersubjective, dialogical
├── Validity claims (truth, rightness, sincerity)
└── Ideal speech situation
```

**Ideal Speech Situation**:
- All affected can participate
- Everyone has equal voice
- Only force of better argument
- No coercion, manipulation

---

## Post-Structuralism

### Foucault: Power/Knowledge

**Against Traditional History**:
- Not continuous progress
- Not driven by ideas or great figures
- Discontinuities, ruptures, epistemic shifts

**Methods**:
```
FOUCAULDIAN METHODS
═══════════════════

ARCHAEOLOGY
├── Uncover historical conditions of knowledge
├── Episteme: unconscious structure governing discourse
├── Not what people thought but what made thought possible
└── Works: Order of Things, Archaeology of Knowledge

GENEALOGY
├── Influenced by Nietzsche
├── History of the present
├── Trace contingent origins, not essences
├── Power relations, not truth
└── Works: Discipline and Punish, History of Sexuality
```

**Power/Knowledge**:
```
POWER/KNOWLEDGE NEXUS
═════════════════════

TRADITIONAL VIEW:
Power represses → Knowledge liberates

FOUCAULT:
Power and knowledge are inseparable
- Knowledge is a form of power
- Power produces knowledge
- No neutral position

DISCIPLINARY POWER
├── Modern form of power
├── Operates through norms, surveillance
├── Produces docile bodies
├── Panopticon as model
└── Schools, prisons, hospitals, factories

BIOPOWER
├── Power over populations
├── Statistics, public health, demographics
├── Life itself as object of governance
└── "Make live and let die"
```

**Key Concepts**:
| Concept | Meaning |
|---------|---------|
| Episteme | Historical conditions of knowledge |
| Discourse | System of statements that produces objects |
| Apparatus (dispositif) | Network of power relations |
| Normalization | Making conform to norms |
| Subjectivation | Process of becoming a subject |

### Derrida: Deconstruction

**Against Western Metaphysics**:
- Logocentric: privileging speech over writing
- Metaphysics of presence: privileging presence over absence
- Binary oppositions: hierarchical (speech/writing, nature/culture)

**Deconstruction** (not a method, but a practice):
```
DECONSTRUCTIVE MOVES
════════════════════

1. IDENTIFY BINARY OPPOSITION
   Example: Speech / Writing

2. SHOW HIERARCHY
   Speech: present, immediate, authentic
   Writing: absent, mediated, derivative

3. REVERSE HIERARCHY
   Show that the "inferior" term is:
   - Necessary for the "superior"
   - Present within it

4. DISPLACE OPPOSITION
   Neither term is fundamental
   Both are effects of deeper process
   → "Différance"
```

**Key Concepts**:
| Concept | Meaning |
|---------|---------|
| Différance | Differs AND defers; play of difference |
| Trace | Presence always marked by absence |
| Supplement | Addition that reveals lack in original |
| Logocentrism | Privileging logos, reason, presence |
| Phonocentrism | Privileging speech over writing |
| Under erasure | Writing a word, crossing it out, keeping both |

### Deleuze (& Guattari): Difference and Multiplicity

**Against Representation**:
- Philosophy has subordinated difference to identity
- Difference is primary, not derived from identity
- Thought should affirm difference, multiplicity

**Key Concepts**:
```
DELEUZIAN VOCABULARY
════════════════════

RHIZOME (vs. Tree)
├── No root or center
├── Multiple entry points
├── Connections, not hierarchies
└── Maps, not tracings

DETERRITORIALIZATION / RETERRITORIALIZATION
├── Flows escape coding
├── Capitalism deterritorializes then recodes
└── Lines of flight

ASSEMBLAGE (agencement)
├── Heterogeneous elements working together
├── Neither organism nor mechanism
└── Productive connections

IMMANENCE
├── No transcendent ground
├── Plane of immanence
└── Life as pure immanence

BECOMING
├── Becoming-woman, becoming-animal, becoming-imperceptible
├── Not imitation but entering relations
└── Transformation without fixed endpoints
```

---

## Psychoanalytic Theory

### Lacan: Return to Freud

**Three Registers**:
```
LACANIAN REGISTERS
══════════════════

THE IMAGINARY
├── Domain of images, identifications
├── Ego formation in mirror stage
├── Illusion of wholeness, coherence
└── Méconnaissance (misrecognition)

THE SYMBOLIC
├── Domain of language, law, culture
├── The Other (big Other): symbolic order
├── Signifier and signified
├── The Name-of-the-Father
└── Castration as entry into language

THE REAL
├── What escapes symbolization
├── Traumatic, impossible
├── Not "reality" but its limit
└── Returns in symptoms
```

**Key Concepts**:
| Concept | Meaning |
|---------|---------|
| Mirror Stage | Infant identifies with image, founding ego |
| The Other | Symbolic order; place of language |
| Objet petit a | Object-cause of desire; unattainable |
| Jouissance | Excessive pleasure-pain beyond pleasure principle |
| Lack | Constitutive absence at heart of subject |

---

## Vocabulary

### German Terms

| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| Aufklärung | Enlightenment |
| Verdinglichung | Reification (making into a thing) |
| Entfremdung | Alienation |
| Ideologiekritik | Ideology critique |
| Lebenswelt | Lifeworld |
| Verständigung | Understanding, reaching agreement |

### French Terms

| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| Différance | Differing and deferring |
| Écriture | Writing |
| Jouissance | Excessive enjoyment |
| Discours | Discourse |
| Dispositif | Apparatus, deployment |
| Savoir | Knowledge (as power) |
| Pouvoir | Power |
| Déterritorialisation | Deterritorialization |
| Agencement | Assemblage |

---

## Methods in Practice

### Genealogical Analysis

1. **Present Problem**: What contemporary practice/concept are we examining?
2. **Historical Discontinuities**: What ruptures and transformations?
3. **Power Relations**: What forces shaped this development?
4. **Contingency**: How might it have been otherwise?
5. **Present Critique**: How does this history illuminate current problems?

### Deconstructive Reading

1. **Identify Binary Oppositions**: What hierarchies structure the text?
2. **Find Contradictions**: Where does the text undermine itself?
3. **Trace Supplements**: What additions reveal originary lack?
4. **Note Exclusions**: What is marginalized or silenced?
5. **Displace Oppositions**: What escapes the binary?

### Ideology Critique

1. **Surface Meaning**: What does the text/practice claim to do?
2. **Interests Served**: Whose interests does it actually serve?
3. **Contradictions**: Where does ideology fail to cohere?
4. **Historical Genesis**: What material conditions produced this ideology?
5. **Emancipatory Alternative**: What would non-ideological practice look like?

---

## Integration with Repository

### Related Thinkers
- `thinkers/foucault/`, `thinkers/nietzsche/`
- `thinkers/marx/` (if profiled)

### Related Themes
- `thoughts/knowledge/`: Power/knowledge
- `thoughts/existence/`: Subject formation
- `thoughts/free_will/`: Ideology and agency

---

## Reference Files

- `methods.md`: Genealogy, deconstruction, ideology critique protocols
- `vocabulary.md`: Technical terms glossary
- `figures.md`: Key philosophers with contributions
- `debates.md`: Central controversies
- `sources.md`: Primary texts and secondary literature

Overview

This skill teaches Continental philosophy and Critical Theory, focusing on interpretation, history, power, language, and social critique. It equips users to read key authors (Foucault, Derrida, Adorno, Habermas, Lacan, Deleuze) and apply methods like genealogy, deconstruction, and ideology critique. The aim is rigorous conceptual mastery with practical analytic tools for texts, institutions, and cultural phenomena.

How this skill works

The skill inspects concepts, texts, and social practices through lineage maps, method checklists, and concise concept definitions. It guides step-by-step procedures—genealogical tracing, deconstructive reading, hermeneutic fusion of horizons, and ideology critique—so you can diagnose power relations, discursive conditions, and subject formation. Outputs include short readings, interpretive moves, and suggested counter-strategies for critique or research.

When to use it

  • Preparing a paper or seminar on post-structuralism, deconstruction, or Critical Theory
  • Analyzing institutions, media, or cultural artifacts for power/knowledge dynamics
  • Designing a genealogy of a contemporary concept or policy
  • Interpreting difficult primary texts (Derrida, Foucault, Adorno, Lacan)
  • Framing a research agenda in hermeneutics, psychoanalytic theory, or Frankfurt School critique

Best practices

  • Begin with historical context: situate texts in their epistemic conditions before close reading
  • Use method-first moves: pick genealogy, deconstruction, or ideology critique and apply its checklist consistently
  • Combine hermeneutics of trust and suspicion: attend to meaning while testing for hidden forces
  • Keep concepts operational: define how you use ‘power,’ ‘discourse,’ ‘reification,’ or ‘différance’ in analysis
  • Prioritize primary texts paired with short secondary readings for clarification and debate

Example use cases

  • Trace the genealogy of the concept of ‘biopolitics’ across 18th–20th century practices
  • Deconstruct a policy text to reveal binary hierarchies and exclusions (e.g., citizen/other)
  • Apply Gadamer’s fusion of horizons to reopen a canonical text in a new historical moment
  • Use ideology critique to map how a marketing campaign manufactures false needs
  • Read Foucault’s Discipline and Punish against present-day surveillance technologies

FAQ

Is this skill normative or descriptive?

It is primarily analytic and diagnostic: it describes discursive and historical formations while enabling normative critique and emancipatory alternatives.

Which method should I start with?

Start with genealogical analysis to locate historical contingencies, then use deconstruction for close textual ruptures and hermeneutics for interpretive synthesis.