home / skills / bobmatnyc / claude-mpm-skills / software-patterns

software-patterns skill

/universal/architecture/software-patterns

This skill helps you select and apply architectural patterns like DI, SOA, and Domain Events based on real problems.

npx playbooks add skill bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills --skill software-patterns

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (7)
SKILL.md
7.0 KB
---
name: software-patterns
description: Decision framework for architectural patterns including DI, SOA, Repository, Domain Events, Circuit Breaker, and Anti-Corruption Layer. Use when designing systems, choosing patterns, or reviewing architecture.
version: 1.0.0
languages: all
progressive_disclosure:
  entry_point:
    summary: "Decision framework for choosing and implementing core architectural patterns"
    when_to_use: "When designing new systems, adding integration points, managing complexity, or reviewing existing architecture"
    quick_start: "1. Identify the problem class 2. Check decision tree 3. Apply foundational patterns (DI+SOA) 4. Layer situational patterns as needed"
  references:
    - foundational-patterns.md
    - situational-patterns.md
    - anti-patterns.md
    - decision-trees.md
    - examples.md
tags:
  - architecture
  - patterns
  - design
  - dependency-injection
  - service-oriented
---

# Software Patterns Primer

## Overview

Architectural patterns solve specific structural problems. This skill provides a decision framework for when to apply each pattern, not a catalog to memorize.

**Core philosophy:** Patterns solve problems. No problem? No pattern needed.

## When to Use This Skill

Activate when:
- Designing a new system or major feature
- Adding external service integrations
- Code becomes difficult to test or modify
- Services start calling each other in circles
- Failures in one component cascade to others
- Business logic scatters across multiple locations

## Pattern Hierarchy

### Foundational (Apply by Default)

These patterns provide the structural foundation for maintainable systems. Apply unless you have specific reasons not to.

| Pattern | Problem Solved | Signal to Apply |
|---------|---------------|-----------------|
| **Dependency Injection** | Tight coupling, untestable code | Classes instantiate their own dependencies |
| **Service-Oriented Architecture** | Monolithic tangles, unclear boundaries | Business logic scattered, no clear ownership |

### Situational (Apply When Triggered)

These patterns address specific problems. Don't apply preemptively.

| Pattern | Problem Solved | Signal to Apply |
|---------|---------------|-----------------|
| **Repository** | Data access coupling | Services know about database details |
| **Domain Events** | Circular dependencies, temporal coupling | Service A calls B calls C calls A |
| **Anti-Corruption Layer** | External system coupling | External API changes break your code |
| **Circuit Breaker** | Cascading failures | One slow service takes down everything |

→ [Foundational Patterns Detail](references/foundational-patterns.md)
→ [Situational Patterns Detail](references/situational-patterns.md)

## Quick Decision Tree

```
Is code hard to test?
├─ Yes → Apply Dependency Injection
└─ No → Continue

Is business logic scattered?
├─ Yes → Apply Service-Oriented Architecture
└─ No → Continue

Do services know database details?
├─ Yes → Apply Repository Pattern
└─ No → Continue

Do services call each other in cycles?
├─ Yes → Apply Domain Events
└─ No → Continue

Does external API change break your code?
├─ Yes → Apply Anti-Corruption Layer
└─ No → Continue

Does one slow service break everything?
├─ Yes → Apply Circuit Breaker
└─ No → Current patterns sufficient
```

→ [Complete Decision Trees](references/decision-trees.md)

## Pattern Selection by Problem

### "My code is hard to test"
**Primary:** Dependency Injection
**Why:** Dependencies passed in = dependencies mockable

### "I don't know where business logic lives"
**Primary:** Service-Oriented Architecture
**Secondary:** Repository (if data access is the confusion)
**Why:** Clear boundaries = clear ownership

### "External API changes keep breaking my code"
**Primary:** Anti-Corruption Layer
**Why:** Translation layer absorbs external volatility

### "Services call each other in circles"
**Primary:** Domain Events
**Why:** Publish/subscribe breaks circular dependencies

### "One slow service takes down everything"
**Primary:** Circuit Breaker
**Secondary:** Retry with Backoff
**Why:** Fail fast prevents cascade

### "Database changes ripple through codebase"
**Primary:** Repository Pattern
**Why:** Abstraction layer isolates data access

→ [Real-World Examples](references/examples.md)

## Implementation Priority

When starting a new system:

1. **First:** Establish DI container/pattern
2. **Second:** Define service boundaries (SOA)
3. **Third:** Add Repository for data access
4. **Then:** Layer situational patterns as problems emerge

When refactoring existing system:

1. **First:** Identify the specific pain point
2. **Second:** Apply the minimal pattern that solves it
3. **Third:** Validate improvement before adding more

## Key Principles

**Minimal Sufficient Pattern**
Apply the simplest pattern that solves the problem. Over-architecting creates its own maintenance burden.

**Problem-First Selection**
Never ask "which patterns should I use?" Ask "what problem am I solving?"

**Composition Over Prescription**
Patterns combine. Repository + Domain Events + Circuit Breaker is common for external data sources.

**Explicit Over Implicit**
Dependencies should be visible. Service Locator hides them; DI exposes them.

## Navigation

### Pattern Details
- **[Foundational Patterns](references/foundational-patterns.md)**: DI and SOA implementation guides, when to deviate
- **[Situational Patterns](references/situational-patterns.md)**: Repository, Domain Events, ACL, Circuit Breaker details

### Decision Support
- **[Decision Trees](references/decision-trees.md)**: Complete flowcharts for pattern selection
- **[Anti-Patterns](references/anti-patterns.md)**: Common misapplications and how to recognize them

### Implementation
- **[Examples](references/examples.md)**: Language-agnostic pseudocode for each pattern combination

## Red Flags - STOP

STOP when:
- "Let me add all these patterns upfront" → Apply only what solves current problems
- "This pattern is best practice" → Best practice for what problem?
- "We might need this later" → YAGNI - add when needed
- "Service Locator is simpler" → Hidden dependencies cause testing pain
- "I'll just call this service directly" → Consider if events would decouple better
- "External API is stable, no need for ACL" → APIs always change eventually

**ALL of these mean: STOP. Identify the specific problem first.**

## Integration with Other Skills

- **test-driven-development**: DI enables testability; TDD validates pattern application
- **systematic-debugging**: Clear boundaries (SOA) simplify debugging
- **root-cause-tracing**: Well-structured services have clearer call chains

## Pattern Combinations

Common effective combinations:

| Scenario | Patterns |
|----------|----------|
| New microservice | DI + SOA + Repository |
| External API integration | DI + ACL + Circuit Breaker |
| Event-driven system | DI + SOA + Domain Events |
| Data-heavy application | DI + SOA + Repository + Unit of Work |

---

**Remember:** Patterns exist to solve problems. Start with the problem, not the pattern.

Overview

This skill is a decision framework for selecting architectural patterns such as Dependency Injection, Service-Oriented Architecture, Repository, Domain Events, Circuit Breaker, and Anti-Corruption Layer. It focuses on diagnosing concrete problems and recommending the minimal, composable pattern set to solve them. Use the framework when designing systems, reviewing architecture, or planning refactors.

How this skill works

The skill inspects system signals and maps them to appropriate patterns using a concise decision tree: testability issues point to DI, scattered business logic to SOA, data-access coupling to Repository, circular service calls to Domain Events, external volatility to Anti-Corruption Layer, and cascading failures to Circuit Breaker. It prioritizes foundational patterns first and then suggests situational patterns only when triggered by evidence. Recommendations emphasize minimal, composable solutions and include implementation priority guidance for new systems and refactors.

When to use it

  • Designing a new system or a major feature and defining architecture boundaries
  • Adding or stabilizing external service integrations that cause frequent breakage
  • When code becomes hard to unit test or dependencies are instantiated inline
  • When services start calling each other cyclically or business logic has unclear ownership
  • When a slow or failing service causes cascading outages across the system

Best practices

  • Start with problem-first selection: pick the simplest pattern that solves the observed pain
  • Apply foundational patterns (DI, SOA) early; add situational patterns only when triggers appear
  • Make dependencies explicit (favor DI) to improve testability and observability
  • Combine patterns pragmatically (e.g., Repository + Domain Events) rather than applying them all at once
  • Validate the change after applying a pattern before introducing additional complexity

Example use cases

  • New microservice: establish DI + SOA + Repository to ensure testability and data isolation
  • External API integration: add an Anti-Corruption Layer plus Circuit Breaker to absorb volatility
  • Refactor to improve tests: introduce DI to make dependencies mockable and reduce tight coupling
  • Break circular service calls: introduce Domain Events and a publish/subscribe flow to decouple services
  • Protect system from slow downstream dependencies: implement Circuit Breaker with retry/backoff policies

FAQ

Should I apply all listed patterns when starting a project?

No. Apply foundational patterns like DI and SOA by default, then add situational patterns only when specific signals or problems appear.

How do I decide between Repository and Anti-Corruption Layer?

Use Repository when internal code is tightly coupled to your database details; use Anti-Corruption Layer when an external system's model or stability threatens your domain logic.