home / skills / az9713 / ai-co-writing-claude-skills / thought-leadership
This skill helps you craft authoritative thought leadership content with original perspectives, structured for impact and credibility across platforms.
npx playbooks add skill az9713/ai-co-writing-claude-skills --skill thought-leadershipReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: thought-leadership
description: Create thought leadership content including long-form articles, essays, and opinion pieces. Use when the user needs authoritative content, wants to establish expertise, or needs to articulate a unique perspective on industry topics.
---
# Thought Leadership Content Creator
Create authoritative, perspective-driven content that establishes expertise and shapes conversations in your industry.
## Before Writing
1. **Read context profiles**:
- `/context/voice-dna.json` - Maintain authentic voice
- `/context/icp.json` - Understand audience sophistication
- `/context/business-profile.json` - Align with positioning
2. **Check knowledge base** for supporting content in `/knowledge/`
## What is Thought Leadership?
Thought leadership is NOT:
- Generic how-to content
- Regurgitated industry advice
- Safe, consensus opinions
- Purely promotional content
Thought leadership IS:
- Original perspectives on industry topics
- Experience-backed insights
- Contrarian (but substantiated) takes
- Forward-looking predictions
- Framework creation
- Problem articulation that others haven't voiced
## Content Types
### Type 1: Perspective Piece
Share your unique POV on an industry topic
```
STRUCTURE:
1. [SETUP] - The current state or common belief
2. [TENSION] - Why this is problematic/incomplete
3. [YOUR PERSPECTIVE] - Your contrarian or nuanced view
4. [EVIDENCE] - Experience, data, examples
5. [IMPLICATIONS] - What this means for the reader
6. [CALL TO THINK] - Leave them with a new lens
```
### Type 2: Framework Introduction
Create a new way of thinking about a problem
```
STRUCTURE:
1. [PROBLEM] - The messy problem everyone faces
2. [WHY EXISTING SOLUTIONS FAIL] - Gap in current thinking
3. [THE FRAMEWORK] - Your new mental model
4. [COMPONENTS] - Break down the framework
5. [APPLICATION] - How to use it
6. [RESULTS] - What changes when applied
```
### Type 3: Industry Prediction
Share where things are heading
```
STRUCTURE:
1. [CURRENT STATE] - Where we are now
2. [SIGNALS] - What you're seeing that others aren't
3. [PREDICTION] - Where things are going
4. [TIMELINE] - When this will happen
5. [IMPLICATIONS] - What to do about it
6. [YOUR POSITION] - How you're preparing
```
### Type 4: Lessons from Experience
Share hard-won wisdom
```
STRUCTURE:
1. [THE SITUATION] - What you faced
2. [THE STAKES] - Why it mattered
3. [THE MISTAKE/CHALLENGE] - What went wrong or was hard
4. [THE INSIGHT] - What you learned
5. [THE PRINCIPLE] - The generalizable lesson
6. [APPLICATION] - How readers can apply it
```
### Type 5: State of the Industry
Comprehensive analysis of where things stand
```
STRUCTURE:
1. [OVERVIEW] - The big picture
2. [KEY TRENDS] - What's happening
3. [ANALYSIS] - What it means
4. [WINNERS/LOSERS] - Who's positioned well
5. [PREDICTIONS] - Where it's going
6. [RECOMMENDATIONS] - What to do
```
## Writing Guidelines
### Voice & Tone
- Confident but not arrogant
- Specific, not vague
- Opinionated with reasoning
- Accessible to ICP
- Personal experiences included
### Structure
- Strong opening hook
- Clear thesis statement
- Logical flow of ideas
- Subheadings for navigation
- Memorable conclusion
### Evidence Types
- Personal experience (primary)
- Client/customer stories
- Industry data
- Historical examples
- Logical reasoning
- Expert quotes (sparingly)
### Length Guidelines
- **LinkedIn article**: 800-1,500 words
- **Newsletter essay**: 1,000-2,500 words
- **Blog post**: 1,500-3,000 words
- **Comprehensive guide**: 3,000-5,000 words
## Content Creation Process
### Step 1: Define the Perspective
Ask:
- "What's the common belief you're challenging?"
- "What's your contrarian or nuanced take?"
- "What experience backs this up?"
- "What's the 'so what' for the reader?"
### Step 2: Structure the Argument
- Lead with the most compelling point
- Build logical progression
- Address counterarguments
- Land with actionable insight
### Step 3: Draft with Voice
- Match voice DNA throughout
- Include personal stories
- Use signature phrases naturally
- Maintain energy level
### Step 4: Polish for Impact
- Strengthen opening hook
- Sharpen key insights
- Remove hedging language
- Ensure clear takeaways
## Output Format
```
TITLE: [Compelling title]
TYPE: [Perspective/Framework/Prediction/Lesson/State of Industry]
TARGET LENGTH: [Word count]
TARGET PLATFORM: [Where this will be published]
---
[FULL ARTICLE CONTENT]
---
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
1. [Main point 1]
2. [Main point 2]
3. [Main point 3]
SUGGESTED SOCIAL SNIPPETS:
- [Quote 1 for social promotion]
- [Quote 2 for social promotion]
```
## Quality Checklist
Before delivering:
- [ ] Original perspective (not generic advice)
- [ ] Clear thesis statement
- [ ] Backed by experience/evidence
- [ ] Voice matches voice DNA
- [ ] Appropriate for ICP sophistication
- [ ] Actionable for readers
- [ ] Strong opening hook
- [ ] Memorable conclusion
- [ ] Would establish/reinforce authority
## What to Avoid
- Wishy-washy "on the other hand" without taking a stance
- Purely theoretical (needs experience backing)
- Clickbait promises without substance
- Attacking competitors by name
- Arrogance or talking down
- Generic conclusions everyone agrees with
- No clear "so what" for the reader
This skill helps create authoritative, perspective-driven thought leadership content: long-form articles, essays, and opinion pieces that establish expertise and shape industry conversations. It focuses on original viewpoints, experience-backed evidence, and forward-looking ideas rather than generic how-to or promotional copy.
The skill guides you through choosing a clear point of view, structuring the argument type (perspective piece, framework, prediction, lesson, or state-of-industry), and drafting with a consistent voice and concrete evidence. It enforces a writing process: define the perspective, structure the argument, draft with voice, and polish for impact, producing a ready-to-publish article plus takeaways and social snippets.
What types of evidence work best in thought leadership?
Primary experience and client outcomes are strongest, complemented by selective industry data and historical examples.
How long should a thought leadership piece be?
Match platform and depth: 800–1,500 words for LinkedIn, 1,000–2,500 for newsletters, 1,500–3,000 for blog posts, and 3,000–5,000 for comprehensive guides.