home / skills / alienfast / claude / pr-update

pr-update skill

/skills/pr-update

This skill generates or updates PR titles and descriptions based on final code state, ensuring accuracy and avoiding removed features.

npx playbooks add skill alienfast/claude --skill pr-update

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (9)
SKILL.md
16.8 KB
---
name: PR Title and Description Generator
description: "Generate or update GitHub Pull Request titles and descriptions based on actual code changes in the final state. Use when the user mentions updating, generating, or writing PR descriptions, PR titles, pull request summaries, or says 'update the PR'. Analyzes git diff to determine what's actually in the code (not just commit history) and creates comprehensive, accurate PR documentation."
---

# PR Title and Description Generator

Generate or update a PR title and description based on the actual changes in the current branch.

## Core Principle

**Document ONLY what exists in the final state of the code, not the development history.**

## Bash Command Rule

**NEVER prefix bash commands with comment lines.** Permission patterns in `~/.claude/settings.json` match against the start of the command. A leading `# comment` breaks the match and triggers a manual permission check. Put descriptions in the Bash tool's `description` parameter instead.

If a feature was added in one commit and removed in another, it should NOT be in the PR description. Always verify features exist in `HEAD` before documenting them.

## Analysis Process

### 1. Identify Current Branch and PR

```bash
git branch --show-current

# Fetch PR information including state for validation
pr_info=$(gh pr view --json number,title,state,mergedAt,headRefName,baseRefName 2>/dev/null)

if [[ -n "$pr_info" ]]; then
  # PR exists - extract state and metadata for validation
  pr_state=$(echo "$pr_info" | jq -r '.state // "UNKNOWN"')
  pr_merged_at=$(echo "$pr_info" | jq -r '.mergedAt // "null"')
  pr_number=$(echo "$pr_info" | jq -r '.number')
  pr_title=$(echo "$pr_info" | jq -r '.title')
  pr_head=$(echo "$pr_info" | jq -r '.headRefName')
  pr_base=$(echo "$pr_info" | jq -r '.baseRefName')

  # Security Fix #4: Validate pr_state is a known GitHub PR state (prevent injection)
  case "$pr_state" in
    OPEN|CLOSED|MERGED|UNKNOWN)
      # Valid state, proceed
      ;;
    *)
      echo "WARNING: Unexpected PR state from GitHub API: $pr_state" >&2
      pr_state="UNKNOWN"
      ;;
  esac

  # Security Fix #4: Validate pr_merged_at is either "null" or valid ISO 8601 timestamp
  if [[ "$pr_merged_at" != "null" ]] && [[ ! "$pr_merged_at" =~ ^[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}T ]]; then
    echo "WARNING: Unexpected mergedAt format from GitHub API: $pr_merged_at" >&2
    pr_merged_at="null"
  fi

# Security Fix #5: Validate pr_number is present and is a positive integer
  if [[ -z "$pr_number" ]] || [[ ! "$pr_number" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]; then
    if [[ -n "$pr_info" ]]; then
      echo "ERROR: PR data incomplete (missing or invalid PR number)" >&2
    fi
    pr_info=""  # Treat as no PR exists
  fi
fi
```

### 1.1. PR State Validation

**CRITICAL SAFEGUARD**: Before updating any PR, verify it is in a safe state to modify.

**When PR exists (pr_info is not empty):**

**Step 1: Check if PR is OPEN** - safe to proceed immediately:

```bash
if [[ "$pr_state" == "OPEN" ]]; then
  # Safe to proceed with normal update workflow
  # Continue to Step 2
fi
```

**Step 2: If PR is NOT OPEN** - stop and ask user for confirmation:

Determine the specific non-open state:

```bash
if [[ "$pr_state" == "MERGED" || "$pr_merged_at" != "null" ]]; then
  pr_status_type="MERGED"
  pr_status_detail="merged"
  pr_status_note="Note: Updating a merged PR only changes its historical record, not the code."
elif [[ "$pr_state" == "CLOSED" ]]; then
  pr_status_type="CLOSED"
  pr_status_detail="closed without merging"
  pr_status_note="Updating a closed PR is unusual. Most cases should create a new PR instead."
else
  pr_status_type="UNKNOWN"
  pr_status_detail="in an unclear state ($pr_state)"
  pr_status_note="Cannot verify PR state safely. Manual investigation recommended."
fi
```

**Step 3: Present confirmation prompt to user**:

Stop execution and display this message (substitute variables with actual values):

```text
⚠️ **PR State Warning**

The detected pull request is **{pr_status_type}**:

- **PR**: #{pr_number} - {pr_title}
- **Branch**: {pr_head} → {pr_base}
- **State**: {pr_status_detail}

**Options:**
1. **Create new PR** - Open a fresh pull request for these changes (recommended for most cases)
2. **Update {pr_status_type} PR anyway** - Modify the PR's title/description (rarely needed)
3. **Cancel** - Stop without making changes

{pr_status_note}

**What would you like to do?**
```

**Step 4: Wait for explicit user response and validate input**:

```bash
# Read user choice
read -p "Enter your choice (1, 2, or 3): " user_choice

# Security Fix #2: Validate input is exactly 1, 2, or 3
if [[ ! "$user_choice" =~ ^[123]$ ]]; then
  echo "Invalid choice. Please enter 1, 2, or 3." >&2
  exit 1
fi
```

**Step 5: Handle user choice based on validated input**:

```bash
case "$user_choice" in
  1)
    # Option 1: Create new PR
    pr_info=""
    echo "Creating new PR instead..."
    ;;
  2)
    # Option 2: Update anyway
    user_confirmed_update="true"
    echo "Proceeding with update to $pr_status_type PR..."
    ;;
  3)
    # Option 3: Cancel
    user_cancelled="true"
    echo "PR update cancelled by user. No changes made."
    exit 0
    ;;
esac
```

**Note on Interactive vs Non-Interactive Handling**:

If implementing this skill as a non-interactive script, Claude should directly handle the user's verbal choice without prompting:

- If user says "create new PR": Set `pr_info=""`
- If user says "update anyway": Set `user_confirmed_update="true"`
- If user says "cancel": Exit gracefully

**When no PR exists (pr_info is empty):**
Skip validation entirely - the skill will create a new PR (normal workflow).

**API Failure Handling:**
If `gh pr view` returns an error OTHER than "no pull requests found", treat as UNKNOWN state and ask user before proceeding.

### 2. Analyze Final State Changes

Get commit count:

```bash
git log main..HEAD --oneline | wc -l
```

Get file change summary:

```bash
git diff main...HEAD --stat
```

Identify major areas of change:

```bash
git diff main...HEAD --name-only | cut -d/ -f1 | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
```

### 3. Code Impact Summary

Generate a categorized line-count breakdown to quantify the PR's impact. This section helps reviewers quickly understand the scope and nature of changes.

**Step 1: Get the raw totals** (with rename detection):

```bash
git diff --shortstat -M main...HEAD
```

**Step 2: Categorize by purpose** using `git diff --numstat`:

```bash
git diff --numstat -M main...HEAD | awk '{if ($3 ~ /lock\.yaml$|lock\.json$|\.lock$/) next; added+=$1; removed+=$2; file=$3; if (file ~ /\.stories\./) {sa+=$1; sr+=$2} else if (file ~ /mock|Mock/) {ma+=$1; mr+=$2} else if (file ~ /generated|packages\/graphql\//) {ga+=$1; gr+=$2} else if (file ~ /ops\//) {oa+=$1; or+=$2} else if (file ~ /\.(yml|yaml|json|css|scss|svg|md)$/) {la+=$1; lr+=$2} else {ca+=$1; cr+=$2}} END {printf "%-20s %8s %8s %8s\n", "Category", "Added", "Removed", "Net"; printf "%-20s %8d %8d %8d\n", "App code", ca, cr, ca-cr; printf "%-20s %8d %8d %8d\n", "Stories", sa, sr, sa-sr; printf "%-20s %8d %8d %8d\n", "Mocks", ma, mr, ma-mr; printf "%-20s %8d %8d %8d\n", "Generated", ga, gr, ga-gr; printf "%-20s %8d %8d %8d\n", "Ops/Infra", oa, or, oa-or; printf "%-20s %8d %8d %8d\n", "Config/Assets", la, lr, la-lr; printf "%-20s %8d %8d %8d\n", "TOTAL", added, removed, added-removed}'
```

**Notes:**

- Use `-M` flag for rename detection (prevents inflated counts from file renames)
- "App code" captures source code files (ts, tsx, rb, etc.) — config/asset files (yml, json, css, lock, svg, md) are separated into "Config/Assets" to keep the signal clean
- Adjust category patterns to match project structure:
  - `\.stories\.` — Storybook story files
  - `mock|Mock` — Test mocks
  - `generated|packages\/graphql\/` — Generated code (GraphQL codegen, etc.)
  - `ops\/` — Infrastructure/operations
  - `lock\.yaml$|lock\.json$|\.lock$` — Lock files (skipped entirely)
  - `\.(yml|yaml|json|css|scss|svg|md)$` — Config, locales, styles, assets
- The categorized breakdown often reveals a different story than raw totals (e.g., production code reduced while test coverage increased)
- If `cloc` is available, `cloc --diff main HEAD --git` provides an alternative per-language breakdown, but lacks categorization and doesn't handle renames

Include the resulting table in the PR description under a **Code Impact** section.

### 4. Verify What's Actually in the Code

**CRITICAL**: For each area of apparent change, verify if it's in the final state:

Check if a feature is in final code:

```bash
git show HEAD:path/to/file.ts | grep -q "feature_name" && echo "PRESENT" || echo "REMOVED"
```

Example — check for authentication plugin:

```bash
git show HEAD:cloud/database/src/SqlDatabase.ts | grep "authentication_plugin"
```

Example — check if a function exists:

```bash
git show HEAD:src/utils.ts | grep -A10 "function myFunction"
```

**If a feature doesn't appear in the final state, DO NOT include it in the PR description.**

### 5. Categorize Changes by Impact

Organize changes into categories based on what's actually present:

- **Infrastructure Changes**: Cloud resources, deployments, architecture
- **Developer Experience**: Tooling, documentation, local development setup
- **CI/CD**: Pipeline changes, automation workflows
- **Breaking Changes**: API changes, configuration requirements, migration needs
- **Dependencies**: Package updates that remain in final package.json/lock files
- **Documentation**: New or updated docs (verify files exist)

### 6. Document Only Present Changes

For each change area:

1. **Verify existence**: Run `git show HEAD:path/to/file` to confirm
2. **Link to files**: Use markdown links with relative paths from repo root
   - Files: `[filename.ts](path/to/filename.ts)`
   - Specific lines: `[filename.ts:42](path/to/filename.ts#L42)`
   - Line ranges: `[filename.ts:42-51](path/to/filename.ts#L42-L51)`
3. **Include code snippets**: For configuration changes, show actual values
4. **Provide context**: Explain why the change was made, not just what changed

## Quality Verification Checklist

Before finalizing the description, verify:

- [ ] Every feature mentioned exists in `git show HEAD:path/to/file`
- [ ] No references to features that were added then removed during development
- [ ] All file links use relative paths from repo root (not absolute paths)
- [ ] Configuration examples reflect actual current state in HEAD
- [ ] Breaking changes are clearly marked with "Breaking Changes" section
- [ ] Testing sections describe actual tests that currently pass
- [ ] Code snippets are from actual files in HEAD, not from memory

## PR Title Formats

See [resources/title-patterns.md](resources/title-patterns.md) for comprehensive title format examples and patterns.

Quick reference:

- Infrastructure: "Enterprise [resource] with [key feature] and [secondary feature]"
- Features: "Add [feature] with [benefit]"
- Bug Fixes: "Fix [specific issue] in [area]"
- Refactoring: "Refactor [area] to [improvement]"

Avoid vague titles like "PR deployment", "Various fixes", or "Update code".

## Description Structure

For detailed templates, see:

- [templates/feature.md](templates/feature.md) - Feature additions
- [templates/bugfix.md](templates/bugfix.md) - Bug fixes
- [templates/infrastructure.md](templates/infrastructure.md) - Infrastructure changes

Use this general template structure:

```markdown
## Summary

[1-2 sentence overview of what this PR accomplishes and why]

## [Major Category 1 - e.g., Infrastructure Changes]

### [Subcategory - e.g., Cloud SQL Enterprise Plus]

**[Feature Name]:**
- [Implementation detail verified in HEAD]
- [Configuration detail with actual values]
- [Benefit or impact]

**Implementation:**
- File: [link to main file](path/to/file.ts)
- Configuration: [link to config](path/to/config.yaml)

**Stack Commands:**
- `./stack command_name` - Description

**Documentation:**
- [Link to relevant docs](doc/path/to/doc.md)

[Repeat structure for each major category]

## Code Impact

| Category | Added | Removed | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| App code | X | X | X |
| Stories | X | X | X |
| Mocks | X | X | X |
| Generated | X | X | X |
| Ops/Infra | X | X | X |
| Config/Assets | X | X | X |
| **Total** | **X** | **X** | **X** |

[1-2 sentence interpretation of what the numbers mean — e.g., "Production code reduced by X lines through Y. Net increase driven by new test coverage."]

## Breaking Changes

### [Area Affected]
- **What changed**: [Specific change]
- **Migration**: [Steps to migrate]
- **Impact**: [Who/what is affected]

## Dependencies

- Updated `package-name` to version X.Y.Z
- Added `new-package` for [specific purpose]
- Removed `old-package` (no longer needed)

## Testing

**[Test Category]:**
- ✅ [Specific test that validates the change]
- ✅ [Another specific test]
- ✅ [Integration test description]

**[Another Test Category]:**
- ✅ [Test description]

## Cost Impact

[If applicable - infrastructure cost changes]

**Production:**
- Current: $X/month
- Planned: $Y/month (with optimization Z)
- Benefit: [SLA/performance/reliability improvements]

**[Environment]:**
- Base: $X/month (shared infrastructure)
- Per-[unit]: +$Y/month

---

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
```

## Verification Workflow

For step-by-step examples of how to analyze and verify PR changes, see [resources/analysis-workflow.md](resources/analysis-workflow.md).

You can also use the verification script:

Check if a feature exists in final state:

```bash
./scripts/verify-feature.sh path/to/file.ts "feature_name"
```

Check if a file exists:

```bash
./scripts/verify-feature.sh packages/api/README.md ""
```

## Important Rules

1. **Verify before documenting** - Always use `git show HEAD:file` to confirm features exist in final state
2. **Never mention removed features** - If a commit added something but it was later removed or reverted, don't include it
3. **Focus on outcomes, not process** - Describe the result, not the development journey
4. **Link to actual code** - Every major feature should have a file reference that users can click
5. **Be specific** - "Add MySQL native password authentication" not "Update database config"
6. **Test your claims** - If you say "CI runs connectivity checks", verify the CI file actually shows that
7. **Use present tense** - "Adds X", "Implements Y", not "Added X", "Implemented Y"
8. **Quantify when possible** - "3x performance improvement", "99.99% SLA", "$460/month cost"

## Common Mistakes to Avoid

### ❌ Documenting Removed Features

```
# Commit history shows:
# - Commit A: Add feature X
# - Commit B: Remove feature X
# Final state: No feature X

# WRONG: "Added feature X"
# RIGHT: Don't mention feature X at all
```

### ❌ Vague Descriptions

```
# WRONG: "Updated database configuration"
# RIGHT: "Set default_authentication_plugin to mysql_native_password for Cloud SQL Proxy v2 compatibility"
```

### ❌ Missing Verification

```
# WRONG: Assume a feature exists because you saw it in commit messages
# RIGHT: git show HEAD:path/to/file.ts | grep "feature_name"
```

### ❌ Broken Links

```
# WRONG: [config.ts](/Users/kross/project/src/config.ts)
# RIGHT: [config.ts](src/config.ts)
```

## After Generating Description

**Security Fix #1 - Command Injection Prevention**: When generating `title` and `description` variables, ensure they are assigned using proper quoting to prevent command injection:

Safe assignment (use quotes):

```bash
title="Generated title text"
description="$(cat <<'EOF'
Multi-line description
EOF
)"
```

UNSAFE — never do this: `title=$(some_command)` without quotes could execute commands in the title.

Update the PR using GitHub CLI.

**Pre-Update State Verification** (prevent TOCTOU race condition) — re-check PR state immediately before update:

```bash
if [[ -n "$pr_number" ]]; then
  current_pr_info=$(gh pr view "$pr_number" --json state 2>/dev/null)

  if [[ -n "$current_pr_info" ]]; then
    current_state=$(echo "$current_pr_info" | jq -r '.state // "UNKNOWN"')

    # Verify state hasn't changed since initial check
    if [[ "$current_state" != "$pr_state" ]]; then
      echo "ERROR: PR state changed during processing" >&2
      echo "  Initial state: $pr_state" >&2
      echo "  Current state: $current_state" >&2
      echo "  Aborting update to prevent unintended modification" >&2
      exit 1
    fi
  else
    echo "ERROR: PR no longer exists (may have been deleted)" >&2
    exit 1
  fi
fi

if [[ "$user_cancelled" == "true" ]]; then
  echo "ERROR: Attempted to continue after user cancellation" >&2
  exit 1
fi

if [[ "$pr_state" != "OPEN" ]] && [[ "$user_confirmed_update" != "true" ]]; then
  echo "ERROR: Attempted to update non-open PR #$pr_number (state: $pr_state) without user confirmation."
  echo "This indicates a bug in the PR state validation logic."
  exit 1
fi

gh pr edit <number> --title "Your Title Here" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
[Your full description here]
EOF
)"
```

Confirm the update was successful:

```bash
gh pr view <number>
```

Overview

This skill generates or updates GitHub Pull Request titles and descriptions by inspecting the repository's final code state (HEAD). It documents only what actually exists in the branch, not interim commits or reverted work. The output is structured, linked to files, and includes a quantified code-impact summary to help reviewers quickly assess scope.

How this skill works

The skill reads git and GitHub metadata (current branch, optional gh PR info) and validates PR state before making updates. It computes diffs and categorized line-counts, verifies presence of features via git show HEAD:path, and constructs a title and a multi-section description with file links, code snippets, impact table, breaking-change notes, dependencies, and tests. If a PR is not open the tool asks for or respects explicit user direction (create new PR, update anyway, or cancel).

When to use it

  • When you ask to create, update, or rewrite a PR title or description.
  • When you want a PR summary based on the final code, not commit history.
  • Before opening a PR to ensure title/description match actual changes.
  • When ensuring breaking changes and migrations are clearly documented.
  • When reviewers need a compact code impact and file-level reference list.

Best practices

  • Always verify features exist in HEAD using git show before including them.
  • Prefer concise, specific PR titles (e.g., "Add X with Y") over vague ones.
  • Include relative file links and line ranges for every major claim.
  • Run the code-impact categorization (-M rename detection) to avoid inflated counts from renames.
  • For non-open PRs, require explicit user choice: create new, update anyway, or cancel.

Example use cases

  • Generate a title and full description for a feature branch with API and infra changes.
  • Update an existing open PR to reflect final refactors and removed drafts.
  • Create a PR summary that isolates breaking changes and provides migration steps.
  • Produce a code-impact table showing added/removed lines by category for reviewer context.
  • Verify and document dependency upgrades present in package.json/lock files.

FAQ

What if the PR was merged or closed?

The skill stops and asks you to choose: create a new PR, proceed to update the historical PR anyway, or cancel. For non-interactive use, you must explicitly state the desired action.

How does it avoid documenting removed features?

Every claimed feature is verified by inspecting HEAD with git show; features absent in the final state are never included in the description.