home / skills / aj-geddes / useful-ai-prompts / bundle-size-optimization
This skill helps optimize JavaScript and CSS bundles via analysis, code splitting, and tree shaking to speed loads and improve performance.
npx playbooks add skill aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill bundle-size-optimizationReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: bundle-size-optimization
description: Reduce JavaScript and CSS bundle sizes through code splitting, tree shaking, and optimization techniques. Improve load times and overall application performance.
---
# Bundle Size Optimization
## Overview
Smaller bundles download faster, parse faster, and execute faster, dramatically improving perceived performance especially on slower networks.
## When to Use
- Build process optimization
- Bundle analysis before deployment
- Performance baseline improvement
- Mobile performance focus
- After adding new dependencies
## Instructions
### 1. **Bundle Analysis**
```javascript
// Analyze bundle composition
class BundleAnalysis {
analyzeBundle() {
return {
tools: [
'webpack-bundle-analyzer',
'Source Map Explorer',
'Bundle Buddy',
'Bundlephobia'
],
metrics: {
total_size: '850KB gzipped',
main_js: '450KB',
main_css: '120KB',
vendor: '250KB',
largest_lib: 'moment.js (67KB)'
},
breakdown: {
react: '85KB (10%)',
lodash: '45KB (5%)',
moment: '67KB (8%)',
other: '653KB (77%)'
}
};
}
identifyOpportunities(bundle) {
const opportunities = [];
// Check for duplicate dependencies
if (bundle.duplicates.length > 0) {
opportunities.push({
issue: 'Duplicate dependencies',
impact: '50KB reduction possible',
solution: 'Deduplicate packages'
});
}
// Check for unused packages
if (bundle.unused.length > 0) {
opportunities.push({
issue: 'Unused dependencies',
impact: '100KB reduction',
solution: 'Remove unused packages'
});
}
// Check bundle size vs targets
if (bundle.gzipped > 250) {
opportunities.push({
issue: 'Bundle too large',
impact: 'Exceeds target',
solution: 'Code splitting or tree shaking'
});
}
return opportunities;
}
}
```
### 2. **Optimization Techniques**
```yaml
Code Splitting:
Route-based: Split by route (each route ~50-100KB)
Component-based: Split large components
Library splitting: Separate vendor bundles
Tools: webpack, dynamic imports, React.lazy()
Tree Shaking:
Remove unused exports
Enable in webpack/rollup
Works best with ES modules
Check: bundle-analyzer shows unused
Minification:
JavaScript: Terser, esbuild
CSS: cssnano, clean-css
Results: 20-30% reduction typical
Examples: 100KB → 70KB
Remove Dependencies:
Moment.js (67KB) → date-fns (13KB)
Lodash (70KB) → lodash-es (30KB, can tree-shake)
Old packages check: npm outdated
Dynamic Imports:
import('module') loads on-demand
Reduces initial bundle
Used for: Modals, off-screen features
Example: 850KB → 400KB initial + lazy
---
Bundle Size Targets:
JavaScript:
Initial: <150KB gzipped
Per route: <50KB gzipped
Total: <300KB gzipped
CSS:
Initial: <50KB gzipped
Per page: <20KB gzipped
Images:
Total: <500KB optimized
Per image: <100KB
```
### 3. **Implementation Strategy**
```yaml
Optimization Plan:
Week 1: Analysis & Quick Wins
- Run bundle analyzer
- Remove unused dependencies
- Update large libraries
- Enable tree shaking
- Expected: 20% reduction
Week 2: Code Splitting
- Implement route-based splitting
- Lazy load heavy components
- Split vendor bundles
- Expected: 40% reduction from initial
Week 3: Advanced Optimization
- Remove unused polyfills
- Upgrade transpiler
- Optimize images in bundle
- Expected: 50-60% total reduction
---
Monitoring:
Setup Budget:
- Track bundle size in CI/CD
- Alert if exceeds threshold
- Track per commit
- Historical trending
Tools:
- bundlesize npm package
- webpack-bundle-analyzer
- GitHub checks integration
Process:
- Measure before
- Implement changes
- Measure after
- Document findings
```
### 4. **Best Practices**
- Monitor bundle size regularly (every build)
- Set strict bundle budgets for teams
- Use modern syntax (don't polyfill all browsers)
- Prefer lighter alternatives to heavy libraries
- Lazy load non-critical code
- Keep vendors separate for better caching
- Remove unused dependencies (npm audit)
- Use production build for measurements
- Test on real 3G network simulation
## Checklist
- [ ] Bundle analyzer installed and configured
- [ ] Unused dependencies removed
- [ ] Code splitting implemented
- [ ] Tree shaking enabled
- [ ] Bundle budget set in CI/CD
- [ ] Large libraries replaced with lighter alternatives
- [ ] Dynamic imports for large features
- [ ] Vendor bundles separated
- [ ] Assets optimized
- [ ] Performance baseline established
## Tips
- Focus on initial bundle first (affects load time most)
- Measure gzipped size (what users receive)
- Tree shaking works best with ES modules only
- Most libraries have lighter alternatives
- Use webpack/vite analyze tools built-in
This skill helps reduce JavaScript and CSS bundle sizes using code splitting, tree shaking, and other optimization techniques to improve load times and perceived performance. It provides analysis, concrete optimization tactics, and an implementation plan to hit practical bundle-size targets.
The skill inspects bundle composition with tools like webpack-bundle-analyzer, Source Map Explorer, and Bundlephobia to identify duplicate and unused dependencies and the largest modules. It recommends concrete fixes—route and component code splitting, dynamic imports, replacing heavy libraries, enabling tree shaking, and minification—and maps them into a week-by-week implementation and CI monitoring plan.
What size targets should I aim for?
Initial JS <150KB gzipped, per route <50KB gzipped, total JS <300KB gzipped; CSS initial <50KB gzipped.
Which tools help monitor and analyze bundles?
webpack-bundle-analyzer, Source Map Explorer, bundlesize, Bundlephobia and CI integrations (GitHub checks) are recommended.