home / skills / aaronontheweb / dotnet-skills / type-design-performance

type-design-performance skill

/skills/csharp/type-design-performance

This skill helps .NET developers design high-performance types by sealing classes, using readonly structs, and deferring enumeration for efficiency.

npx playbooks add skill aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill type-design-performance

Review the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.

Files (1)
SKILL.md
9.8 KB
---
name: type-design-performance
description: Design .NET types for performance. Seal classes, use readonly structs, prefer static pure functions, avoid premature enumeration, and choose the right collection types.
---

# Type Design for Performance

## When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:
- Designing new types and APIs
- Reviewing code for performance issues
- Choosing between class, struct, and record
- Working with collections and enumerables

---

## Core Principles

1. **Seal your types** - Unless explicitly designed for inheritance
2. **Prefer readonly structs** - For small, immutable value types
3. **Prefer static pure functions** - Better performance and testability
4. **Defer enumeration** - Don't materialize until you need to
5. **Return immutable collections** - From API boundaries

---

## Seal Classes by Default

Sealing classes enables JIT devirtualization and communicates API intent.

```csharp
// DO: Seal classes not designed for inheritance
public sealed class OrderProcessor
{
    public void Process(Order order) { }
}

// DO: Seal records (they're classes)
public sealed record OrderCreated(OrderId Id, CustomerId CustomerId);

// DON'T: Leave unsealed without reason
public class OrderProcessor  // Can be subclassed - intentional?
{
    public virtual void Process(Order order) { }  // Virtual = slower
}
```

**Benefits:**
- JIT can devirtualize method calls
- Communicates "this is not an extension point"
- Prevents accidental breaking changes

---

## Readonly Structs for Value Types

Structs should be `readonly` when immutable. This prevents defensive copies.

```csharp
// DO: Readonly struct for immutable value types
public readonly record struct OrderId(Guid Value)
{
    public static OrderId New() => new(Guid.NewGuid());
    public override string ToString() => Value.ToString();
}

// DO: Readonly struct for small, short-lived data
public readonly struct Money
{
    public decimal Amount { get; }
    public string Currency { get; }

    public Money(decimal amount, string currency)
    {
        Amount = amount;
        Currency = currency;
    }
}

// DON'T: Mutable struct (causes defensive copies)
public struct Point  // Not readonly!
{
    public int X { get; set; }  // Mutable!
    public int Y { get; set; }
}
```

### When to Use Structs

| Use Struct When | Use Class When |
|-----------------|----------------|
| Small (≤16 bytes typically) | Larger objects |
| Short-lived | Long-lived |
| Frequently allocated | Shared references needed |
| Value semantics required | Identity semantics required |
| Immutable | Mutable state |

---

## Prefer Static Pure Functions

Static methods with no side effects are faster and more testable.

```csharp
// DO: Static pure function
public static class OrderCalculator
{
    public static Money CalculateTotal(IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items)
    {
        var total = items.Sum(i => i.Price * i.Quantity);
        return new Money(total, "USD");
    }
}

// Usage - predictable, testable
var total = OrderCalculator.CalculateTotal(items);
```

**Benefits:**
- No vtable lookup (faster)
- No hidden state
- Easier to test (pure input → output)
- Thread-safe by design
- Forces explicit dependencies

```csharp
// DON'T: Instance method hiding dependencies
public class OrderCalculator
{
    private readonly ITaxService _taxService;  // Hidden dependency
    private readonly IDiscountService _discountService;  // Hidden dependency

    public Money CalculateTotal(IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items)
    {
        // What does this actually depend on?
    }
}

// BETTER: Explicit dependencies via parameters
public static class OrderCalculator
{
    public static Money CalculateTotal(
        IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items,
        decimal taxRate,
        decimal discountPercent)
    {
        // All inputs visible
    }
}
```

**Don't go overboard** - Use instance methods when you genuinely need state or polymorphism.

---

## Defer Enumeration

Don't materialize enumerables until necessary. Avoid excessive LINQ chains.

```csharp
// BAD: Premature materialization
public IReadOnlyList<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
    return _orders
        .Where(o => o.IsActive)
        .ToList()  // Materialized!
        .OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt)  // Another iteration
        .ToList();  // Materialized again!
}

// GOOD: Defer until the end
public IReadOnlyList<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
    return _orders
        .Where(o => o.IsActive)
        .OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt)
        .ToList();  // Single materialization
}

// GOOD: Return IEnumerable if caller might not need all items
public IEnumerable<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
    return _orders
        .Where(o => o.IsActive)
        .OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt);
    // Caller decides when to materialize
}
```

### Async Enumeration

Be careful with async and IEnumerable:

```csharp
// BAD: Async in LINQ - hidden allocations
var results = orders
    .Select(async o => await ProcessOrderAsync(o))  // Task per item!
    .ToList();
await Task.WhenAll(results);

// GOOD: Use IAsyncEnumerable for streaming
public async IAsyncEnumerable<OrderResult> ProcessOrdersAsync(
    IEnumerable<Order> orders,
    [EnumeratorCancellation] CancellationToken ct = default)
{
    foreach (var order in orders)
    {
        ct.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
        yield return await ProcessOrderAsync(order, ct);
    }
}

// GOOD: Batch processing for parallelism
var results = await Task.WhenAll(
    orders.Select(o => ProcessOrderAsync(o)));
```

---

## ValueTask vs Task

Use `ValueTask` for hot paths that often complete synchronously. For real I/O, just use `Task`.

```csharp
// DO: ValueTask for cached/synchronous paths
public ValueTask<User?> GetUserAsync(UserId id)
{
    if (_cache.TryGetValue(id, out var user))
    {
        return ValueTask.FromResult<User?>(user);  // No allocation
    }

    return new ValueTask<User?>(FetchUserAsync(id));
}

// DO: Task for real I/O (simpler, no footguns)
public Task<Order> CreateOrderAsync(CreateOrderCommand cmd)
{
    // This always hits the database
    return _repository.CreateAsync(cmd);
}
```

**ValueTask rules:**
- Never await a ValueTask more than once
- Never use `.Result` or `.GetAwaiter().GetResult()` before completion
- If in doubt, use Task

---

## Span and Memory for Bytes

Use `Span<T>` and `Memory<T>` instead of `byte[]` for low-level operations.

```csharp
// DO: Accept Span for synchronous operations
public static int ParseInt(ReadOnlySpan<char> text)
{
    return int.Parse(text);
}

// DO: Accept Memory for async operations
public async Task WriteAsync(ReadOnlyMemory<byte> data)
{
    await _stream.WriteAsync(data);
}

// DON'T: Force array allocation
public static int ParseInt(string text)  // String allocated
{
    return int.Parse(text);
}
```

### Common Span Patterns

```csharp
// Slice without allocation
ReadOnlySpan<char> span = "Hello, World!".AsSpan();
var hello = span[..5];  // No allocation

// Stack allocation for small buffers
Span<byte> buffer = stackalloc byte[256];

// Use ArrayPool for larger buffers
var buffer = ArrayPool<byte>.Shared.Rent(4096);
try
{
    // Use buffer...
}
finally
{
    ArrayPool<byte>.Shared.Return(buffer);
}
```

---

## Collection Return Types

### Return Immutable Collections from APIs

```csharp
// DO: Return immutable collection
public IReadOnlyList<Order> GetOrders()
{
    return _orders.ToList();  // Caller can't modify internal state
}

// DO: Use frozen collections for static data (.NET 8+)
private static readonly FrozenDictionary<string, Handler> _handlers =
    new Dictionary<string, Handler>
    {
        ["create"] = new CreateHandler(),
        ["update"] = new UpdateHandler(),
    }.ToFrozenDictionary();

// DON'T: Return mutable collection
public List<Order> GetOrders()
{
    return _orders;  // Caller can modify!
}
```

### Internal Mutation is Fine

```csharp
public IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> BuildOrderItems(Cart cart)
{
    var items = new List<OrderItem>();  // Mutable internally

    foreach (var cartItem in cart.Items)
    {
        items.Add(CreateOrderItem(cartItem));
    }

    return items;  // Return as IReadOnlyList
}
```

### Collection Guidelines

| Scenario | Return Type |
|----------|-------------|
| API boundary | `IReadOnlyList<T>`, `IReadOnlyCollection<T>` |
| Static lookup data | `FrozenDictionary<K,V>`, `FrozenSet<T>` |
| Internal building | `List<T>`, then return as readonly |
| Single item or none | `T?` (nullable) |
| Zero or more, lazy | `IEnumerable<T>` |

---

## Quick Reference

| Pattern | Benefit |
|---------|---------|
| `sealed class` | Devirtualization, clear API |
| `readonly record struct` | No defensive copies, value semantics |
| Static pure functions | No vtable, testable, thread-safe |
| Defer `.ToList()` | Single materialization |
| `ValueTask` for hot paths | Avoid Task allocation |
| `Span<T>` for bytes | Stack allocation, no copying |
| `IReadOnlyList<T>` return | Immutable API contract |
| `FrozenDictionary` | Fastest lookup for static data |

---

## Anti-Patterns

```csharp
// DON'T: Unsealed class without reason
public class OrderService { }  // Seal it!

// DON'T: Mutable struct
public struct Point { public int X; public int Y; }  // Make readonly

// DON'T: Instance method that could be static
public int Add(int a, int b) => a + b;  // Make static

// DON'T: Multiple ToList() calls
items.Where(...).ToList().OrderBy(...).ToList();  // One ToList at end

// DON'T: Return List<T> from public API
public List<Order> GetOrders();  // Return IReadOnlyList<T>

// DON'T: ValueTask for always-async operations
public ValueTask<Order> CreateOrderAsync();  // Just use Task
```

---

## Resources

- **Performance Best Practices**: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/performance/
- **Span<T> Guidance**: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/memory-and-spans/
- **Frozen Collections**: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.collections.frozen

Overview

This skill helps .NET developers design types and APIs for high performance and clarity. It codifies practical rules: seal classes by default, prefer readonly structs for small immutable values, use static pure functions when possible, and choose collection and async primitives that minimize allocations. Follow these patterns to reduce runtime costs, improve testability, and make intent explicit.

How this skill works

The skill inspects type design and API surface choices and highlights patterns that affect JIT behavior, allocations, and copying. It checks class sealing, struct immutability, method staticness, enumeration materialization, appropriate async return types (Task vs ValueTask), and use of Span/Memory and immutable collection return types. It provides recommendations you can apply during design, code review, or refactoring to reduce hidden costs.

When to use it

  • Designing new public APIs and library types
  • Reviewing code for performance regressions or unnecessary allocations
  • Choosing between class, struct, or record for a domain type
  • Deciding how to return or expose collections from APIs
  • Optimizing hot paths, I/O patterns, or high-allocation scenarios

Best practices

  • Seal classes unless you intentionally design for inheritance to enable devirtualization
  • Make small value types readonly structs to avoid defensive copies
  • Prefer static, pure functions for logic that has no hidden state to remove vtable lookup and improve testability
  • Defer enumeration and avoid multiple ToList/ToArray calls—materialize once at the end
  • Use ValueTask only for hot paths that often complete synchronously; otherwise prefer Task
  • Use Span<T>/Memory<T> and ArrayPool for low-level byte/buffer work to avoid allocations

Example use cases

  • Create an OrderId as a readonly record struct to represent small immutable identifiers
  • Seal service and handler classes to allow JIT devirtualization and express API intent
  • Return IReadOnlyList<T> or frozen collections from public APIs to prevent caller mutation
  • Replace multiple LINQ materializations with a single ordering and one ToList at the end
  • Use ValueTask for cached lookup methods and Task for database or network I/O

FAQ

When should I choose a struct over a class?

Use a struct when the type is small (typically ≤16 bytes), immutable, short-lived, and value semantics are required; otherwise use a class for larger or identity-bearing objects.

When is ValueTask appropriate?

Use ValueTask for hot paths that frequently complete synchronously (cached or in-memory results). For real I/O or when unsure, prefer Task to avoid usage pitfalls.