home / skills / aaronontheweb / dotnet-skills / dependency-injection
/skills/microsoft-extensions/dependency-injection
This skill helps you organize dependency injection registrations via extension methods, enabling reusable production configurations and cleaner program startup.
npx playbooks add skill aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill dependency-injectionReview the files below or copy the command above to add this skill to your agents.
---
name: dependency-injection-patterns
description: Organize DI registrations using IServiceCollection extension methods. Group related services into composable Add* methods for clean Program.cs and reusable configuration in tests.
---
# Dependency Injection Patterns
## When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Organizing service registrations in ASP.NET Core applications
- Avoiding massive Program.cs/Startup.cs files with hundreds of registrations
- Making service configuration reusable between production and tests
- Designing libraries that integrate with Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection
---
## The Problem
Without organization, Program.cs becomes unmanageable:
```csharp
// BAD: 200+ lines of unorganized registrations
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IProductRepository, ProductRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderService, OrderService>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IEmailComposer, MjmlEmailComposer>();
builder.Services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IPaymentProcessor, StripePaymentProcessor>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IInvoiceGenerator, InvoiceGenerator>();
// ... 150 more lines ...
```
Problems:
- Hard to find related registrations
- No clear boundaries between subsystems
- Can't reuse configuration in tests
- Merge conflicts in team settings
- No encapsulation of internal dependencies
---
## The Solution: Extension Method Composition
Group related registrations into extension methods:
```csharp
// GOOD: Clean, composable Program.cs
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services
.AddUserServices()
.AddOrderServices()
.AddEmailServices()
.AddPaymentServices()
.AddValidators();
var app = builder.Build();
```
Each `Add*` method encapsulates a cohesive set of registrations.
---
## Extension Method Pattern
### Basic Structure
```csharp
namespace MyApp.Users;
public static class UserServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddUserServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
// Repositories
services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IUserReadStore, UserReadStore>();
services.AddScoped<IUserWriteStore, UserWriteStore>();
// Services
services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
services.AddScoped<IUserValidationService, UserValidationService>();
// Return for chaining
return services;
}
}
```
### With Configuration
```csharp
namespace MyApp.Email;
public static class EmailServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddEmailServices(
this IServiceCollection services,
string configSectionName = "EmailSettings")
{
// Bind configuration
services.AddOptions<EmailOptions>()
.BindConfiguration(configSectionName)
.ValidateDataAnnotations()
.ValidateOnStart();
// Register services
services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();
services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();
services.AddScoped<IUserEmailComposer, UserEmailComposer>();
services.AddScoped<IOrderEmailComposer, OrderEmailComposer>();
// SMTP client depends on environment
services.AddScoped<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();
return services;
}
}
```
### With Dependencies on Other Extensions
```csharp
namespace MyApp.Orders;
public static class OrderServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddOrderServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
// This subsystem depends on email services
// Caller is responsible for calling AddEmailServices() first
// Or we can call it here if it's idempotent
services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IOrderService, OrderService>();
services.AddScoped<IOrderEmailNotifier, OrderEmailNotifier>();
return services;
}
}
```
---
## File Organization
Place extension methods near the services they register:
```
src/
MyApp.Api/
Program.cs # Composes all Add* methods
MyApp.Users/
Services/
UserService.cs
IUserService.cs
Repositories/
UserRepository.cs
UserServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddUserServices()
MyApp.Orders/
Services/
OrderService.cs
OrderServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddOrderServices()
MyApp.Email/
Composers/
UserEmailComposer.cs
EmailServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddEmailServices()
```
**Convention**: `{Feature}ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs` next to the feature's services.
---
## Naming Conventions
| Pattern | Use For |
|---------|---------|
| `Add{Feature}Services()` | General feature registration |
| `Add{Feature}()` | Short form when unambiguous |
| `Configure{Feature}()` | When primarily setting options |
| `Use{Feature}()` | Middleware (on IApplicationBuilder) |
```csharp
// Feature services
services.AddUserServices();
services.AddEmailServices();
services.AddPaymentServices();
// Third-party integrations
services.AddStripePayments();
services.AddSendGridEmail();
// Configuration-heavy
services.ConfigureAuthentication();
services.ConfigureAuthorization();
```
---
## Testing Benefits
The main advantage: **reuse production configuration in tests**.
### WebApplicationFactory
```csharp
public class ApiTests : IClassFixture<WebApplicationFactory<Program>>
{
private readonly WebApplicationFactory<Program> _factory;
public ApiTests(WebApplicationFactory<Program> factory)
{
_factory = factory.WithWebHostBuilder(builder =>
{
builder.ConfigureServices(services =>
{
// Production services already registered via Add* methods
// Only override what's different for testing
// Replace email sender with test double
services.RemoveAll<IEmailSender>();
services.AddSingleton<IEmailSender, TestEmailSender>();
// Replace external payment processor
services.RemoveAll<IPaymentProcessor>();
services.AddSingleton<IPaymentProcessor, FakePaymentProcessor>();
});
});
}
[Fact]
public async Task CreateOrder_SendsConfirmationEmail()
{
var client = _factory.CreateClient();
var emailSender = _factory.Services.GetRequiredService<IEmailSender>() as TestEmailSender;
await client.PostAsJsonAsync("/api/orders", new CreateOrderRequest(...));
Assert.Single(emailSender!.SentEmails);
}
}
```
### Akka.Hosting.TestKit
```csharp
public class OrderActorSpecs : Akka.Hosting.TestKit.TestKit
{
protected override void ConfigureAkka(AkkaConfigurationBuilder builder, IServiceProvider provider)
{
// Reuse production Akka configuration
builder.AddOrderActors();
}
protected override void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
// Reuse production service configuration
services.AddOrderServices();
// Override only external dependencies
services.RemoveAll<IPaymentProcessor>();
services.AddSingleton<IPaymentProcessor, FakePaymentProcessor>();
}
[Fact]
public async Task OrderActor_ProcessesPayment()
{
var orderActor = ActorRegistry.Get<OrderActor>();
orderActor.Tell(new ProcessOrder(orderId));
ExpectMsg<OrderProcessed>();
}
}
```
### Standalone Unit Tests
```csharp
public class UserServiceTests
{
private readonly ServiceProvider _provider;
public UserServiceTests()
{
var services = new ServiceCollection();
// Reuse production registrations
services.AddUserServices();
// Add test infrastructure
services.AddSingleton<IUserRepository, InMemoryUserRepository>();
_provider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
}
[Fact]
public async Task CreateUser_ValidData_Succeeds()
{
var service = _provider.GetRequiredService<IUserService>();
var result = await service.CreateUserAsync(new CreateUserRequest(...));
Assert.True(result.IsSuccess);
}
}
```
---
## Layered Extensions
For larger applications, compose extensions hierarchically:
```csharp
// Top-level: Everything the app needs
public static class AppServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddAppServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
return services
.AddDomainServices()
.AddInfrastructureServices()
.AddApiServices();
}
}
// Domain layer
public static class DomainServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddDomainServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
return services
.AddUserServices()
.AddOrderServices()
.AddProductServices();
}
}
// Infrastructure layer
public static class InfrastructureServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddInfrastructureServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
return services
.AddEmailServices()
.AddPaymentServices()
.AddStorageServices();
}
}
```
---
## Akka.Hosting Integration
The same pattern works for Akka.NET actor configuration:
```csharp
public static class OrderActorExtensions
{
public static AkkaConfigurationBuilder AddOrderActors(
this AkkaConfigurationBuilder builder)
{
return builder
.WithActors((system, registry, resolver) =>
{
var orderProps = resolver.Props<OrderActor>();
var orderRef = system.ActorOf(orderProps, "orders");
registry.Register<OrderActor>(orderRef);
})
.WithShardRegion<OrderShardActor>(
typeName: "order-shard",
(system, registry, resolver) =>
entityId => resolver.Props<OrderShardActor>(entityId),
new OrderMessageExtractor(),
ShardOptions.Create());
}
}
// Usage in Program.cs
builder.Services.AddAkka("MySystem", (builder, sp) =>
{
builder
.AddOrderActors()
.AddInventoryActors()
.AddNotificationActors();
});
```
See `akka/hosting-actor-patterns` skill for complete Akka.Hosting patterns.
---
## Common Patterns
### Conditional Registration
```csharp
public static IServiceCollection AddEmailServices(
this IServiceCollection services,
IHostEnvironment environment)
{
services.AddSingleton<IEmailComposer, MjmlEmailComposer>();
if (environment.IsDevelopment())
{
// Use Mailpit in development
services.AddSingleton<IEmailSender, MailpitEmailSender>();
}
else
{
// Use real SMTP in production
services.AddSingleton<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();
}
return services;
}
```
### Factory-Based Registration
```csharp
public static IServiceCollection AddPaymentServices(
this IServiceCollection services,
string configSection = "Stripe")
{
services.AddOptions<StripeOptions>()
.BindConfiguration(configSection)
.ValidateOnStart();
// Factory for complex initialization
services.AddSingleton<IPaymentProcessor>(sp =>
{
var options = sp.GetRequiredService<IOptions<StripeOptions>>().Value;
var logger = sp.GetRequiredService<ILogger<StripePaymentProcessor>>();
return new StripePaymentProcessor(options.ApiKey, options.WebhookSecret, logger);
});
return services;
}
```
### Keyed Services (.NET 8+)
```csharp
public static IServiceCollection AddNotificationServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
// Register multiple implementations with keys
services.AddKeyedSingleton<INotificationSender, EmailNotificationSender>("email");
services.AddKeyedSingleton<INotificationSender, SmsNotificationSender>("sms");
services.AddKeyedSingleton<INotificationSender, PushNotificationSender>("push");
// Resolver that picks the right one
services.AddScoped<INotificationDispatcher, NotificationDispatcher>();
return services;
}
```
---
## Anti-Patterns
### Don't: Register Everything in Program.cs
```csharp
// BAD: Massive Program.cs
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
// ... 200 more lines ...
```
### Don't: Create Overly Generic Extensions
```csharp
// BAD: Too vague, doesn't communicate what's registered
public static IServiceCollection AddServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
// Registers 50 random things
}
```
### Don't: Hide Important Configuration
```csharp
// BAD: Buried important settings
public static IServiceCollection AddDatabase(this IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer("hardcoded-connection-string")); // Hidden!
}
// GOOD: Accept configuration explicitly
public static IServiceCollection AddDatabase(
this IServiceCollection services,
string connectionString)
{
services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer(connectionString));
}
```
---
## Best Practices Summary
| Practice | Benefit |
|----------|---------|
| Group related services into `Add*` methods | Clean Program.cs, clear boundaries |
| Place extensions near the services they register | Easy to find and maintain |
| Return `IServiceCollection` for chaining | Fluent API |
| Accept configuration parameters | Flexibility |
| Use consistent naming (`Add{Feature}Services`) | Discoverability |
| Test by reusing production extensions | Confidence, less duplication |
---
## Lifetime Management
Choose the right lifetime based on state:
| Lifetime | Use When | Examples |
|----------|----------|----------|
| **Singleton** | Stateless, thread-safe, expensive to create | Configuration, HttpClient factories, caches |
| **Scoped** | Stateful per-request, database contexts | DbContext, repositories, user context |
| **Transient** | Lightweight, stateful, cheap to create | Validators, short-lived helpers |
### Rules of Thumb
```csharp
// SINGLETON: Stateless services, shared safely
services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();
services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();
// SCOPED: Database access, per-request state
services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>(); // DbContext dependency
services.AddScoped<IOrderService, OrderService>(); // Uses scoped repos
// TRANSIENT: Cheap, short-lived
services.AddTransient<CreateUserRequestValidator>();
```
### Scope Requirements
**Scoped services require a scope to exist.** In ASP.NET Core, each HTTP request creates a scope automatically. But in other contexts (background services, actors), you must create scopes manually.
```csharp
// ASP.NET Controller - scope exists automatically
public class OrdersController : ControllerBase
{
private readonly IOrderService _orderService; // Scoped - works!
public OrdersController(IOrderService orderService)
{
_orderService = orderService;
}
}
// Background Service - no automatic scope!
public class OrderProcessingService : BackgroundService
{
private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;
public OrderProcessingService(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
// Inject IServiceProvider, NOT scoped services directly
_serviceProvider = serviceProvider;
}
protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken ct)
{
while (!ct.IsCancellationRequested)
{
// Create scope manually for each unit of work
using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();
var orderService = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOrderService>();
await orderService.ProcessPendingOrdersAsync(ct);
await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1), ct);
}
}
}
```
---
## Akka.NET Actor Scope Management
**Actors don't have automatic DI scopes.** If you need scoped services inside an actor, inject `IServiceProvider` and create scopes manually.
### Pattern: Scope Per Message
```csharp
public sealed class AccountProvisionActor : ReceiveActor
{
private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;
private readonly IActorRef _mailingActor;
public AccountProvisionActor(
IServiceProvider serviceProvider,
IRequiredActor<MailingActor> mailingActor)
{
_serviceProvider = serviceProvider;
_mailingActor = mailingActor.ActorRef;
ReceiveAsync<ProvisionAccount>(HandleProvisionAccount);
}
private async Task HandleProvisionAccount(ProvisionAccount msg)
{
// Create scope for this message processing
using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();
// Resolve scoped services
var userManager = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<UserManager<User>>();
var orderRepository = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOrderRepository>();
var emailComposer = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IPaymentEmailComposer>();
// Do work with scoped services
var user = await userManager.FindByIdAsync(msg.UserId);
var order = await orderRepository.CreateAsync(msg.Order);
// DbContext commits when scope disposes
}
}
```
### Why This Pattern Works
1. **Each message gets fresh DbContext** - No stale entity tracking
2. **Proper disposal** - Connections released after each message
3. **Isolation** - One message's errors don't affect others
4. **Testable** - Can inject mock IServiceProvider
### Singleton Services in Actors
For stateless services, inject directly (no scope needed):
```csharp
public sealed class NotificationActor : ReceiveActor
{
private readonly IEmailLinkGenerator _linkGenerator; // Singleton - OK!
private readonly IActorRef _mailingActor;
public NotificationActor(
IEmailLinkGenerator linkGenerator, // Direct injection
IRequiredActor<MailingActor> mailingActor)
{
_linkGenerator = linkGenerator;
_mailingActor = mailingActor.ActorRef;
Receive<SendWelcomeEmail>(Handle);
}
}
```
### Akka.DependencyInjection Reference
Akka.NET's DI integration is documented at:
- **Akka.DependencyInjection**: https://getakka.net/articles/actors/dependency-injection.html
- **Akka.Hosting**: https://github.com/akkadotnet/Akka.Hosting
---
## Common Mistakes
### Injecting Scoped into Singleton
```csharp
// BAD: Singleton captures scoped service - stale DbContext!
public class CacheService // Registered as Singleton
{
private readonly IUserRepository _repo; // Scoped!
public CacheService(IUserRepository repo) // Captured at startup!
{
_repo = repo; // This DbContext lives forever - BAD
}
}
// GOOD: Inject factory or IServiceProvider
public class CacheService
{
private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;
public CacheService(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
_serviceProvider = serviceProvider;
}
public async Task<User> GetUserAsync(string id)
{
using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();
var repo = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IUserRepository>();
return await repo.GetByIdAsync(id);
}
}
```
### No Scope in Background Work
```csharp
// BAD: No scope for scoped services
public class BadBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
private readonly IOrderService _orderService; // Scoped!
public BadBackgroundService(IOrderService orderService)
{
_orderService = orderService; // Will throw or behave unexpectedly
}
}
// GOOD: Create scope for each unit of work
public class GoodBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
private readonly IServiceScopeFactory _scopeFactory;
public GoodBackgroundService(IServiceScopeFactory scopeFactory)
{
_scopeFactory = scopeFactory;
}
protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken ct)
{
using var scope = _scopeFactory.CreateScope();
var orderService = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOrderService>();
// ...
}
}
```
---
## Resources
- **Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection**: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/extensions/dependency-injection
- **Akka.Hosting**: https://github.com/akkadotnet/Akka.Hosting
- **Akka.DependencyInjection**: https://getakka.net/articles/actors/dependency-injection.html
- **Options Pattern**: See `microsoft-extensions/configuration` skill
This skill shows how to organize dependency injection registrations by grouping related services into IServiceCollection extension methods. It keeps Program.cs or Startup.cs concise, makes configuration reusable in tests, and enables clear boundaries between subsystems. The pattern supports configuration binding, conditional registration, factory-based services, and hierarchical composition for large apps.
Create small, focused Add* extension methods that register a cohesive set of services and return IServiceCollection for chaining. Place each extension near the feature it configures, accept configuration parameters or IHostEnvironment when needed, and call other Add* methods when one subsystem depends on another. Use this same composition in tests and hosting builders to reuse production wiring and override external dependencies.
Should Add* extensions call other Add* extensions or require callers to call them?
Prefer idempotent calls: either document the dependency or call the required Add* internally if doing so is safe and doesn’t surprise consumers.
How do I handle configuration in extensions?
Accept a config section name or options instance, bind with AddOptions<T>().BindConfiguration(...).ValidateOnStart(), and avoid hardcoding connection strings or secrets.